[jbosstools-dev] Support of ADF components in VPE survey

[Sergey Vasilyev]

Pete Muir wrote:
> Assuming we are really talking about Trinidad, not ADF (ADF is the non 
> opensource varient).
>
> Coexist with Seam (very) well.
>
> Coexist with RichFaces ok (there is an integration package). Alex can 
> comment better.
>
> No extra issues when you use Seam+RF+Trinidad. You can see the 
> seamdiscs example for it in operation.
>
> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:51, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:50:27 +0100, Pete Muir <pete.muir at jboss.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Technically good, visually appalling.
>>
>> any known issues/recommendations in context of Seam/richfaces ? Do 
>> they coexist well/bad?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we have any coverage of it today ?
>>>>
>>>> I've cc'ed Pete and Gavin to hear about their experience/feedback
>>>> on ADF.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask all of you about supporting ADF Faces Components
>>>>> (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/adffaces/
>>>>> index.html) in
>>>>> our Visual Page Editor. Set of ADF components consists of over 100
>>>>> components. Does the support of ADF components still relevant for us?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sergey
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
Unfortunately we are supporting the ADF Faces Components (old versions 
from uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA10" till 
uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA13").right now. It is a legacy 
from Exadel Studio. And I'm speaking about supporting of ADF (not 
opensource)  and Trinidad (http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad).

Sergey