[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Sergey Vasilyev]

Rob Stryker wrote:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins 
>
Unfortunately I do not see there 
org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar plugin. 
<ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar>

/sergey
<ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar> 

>
> Sergey Vasilyev wrote:
>> Rob Stryker wrote:
>>> Or we should have used the official releases by ATF, who *did* 
>>> compile 1.8.1.3 and who released it.
>> Rob, could you please provide me with a link to 1.8.1.3 x86_64 
>> xulrunner plugin provided by ATF?
>>
>> /sergey
>>>
>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized 
>>>> that ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>>> This should be up to the VPE team to decide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would prefer one version used across the board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>> Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> /sergey
>>>>>  
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) 
>>>>>>> use a
>>>>>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases.
>>>>>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 
>>>>>>> 1.8.1.3
>>>>>>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the 
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure 
>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... 
>>>>>>> but with
>>>>>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone
>>>>>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the 
>>>>>>> file in
>>>>>>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Rob Stryker
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>
>>
>