[jbosstools-dev] Moving to XulRunner 1.9

Maksim Areshkau mareshkau at exadel.com
Tue Sep 1 14:17:19 EDT 2009


Maksim Areshkau wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:27 -0400, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> I don't have the resources to promise that the javaxpcom will
>>> work/be
>>>> maintained so i guess for now we will just continue to bundle the
>>>> eclipse/mozilla custom built one so any security issues is not
>>> exposed
>>>> in the general browser but only in the development tooling
>>>> where it is less of an issue since it is primarily used to access
>>>> local sites.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>> What does this mean for question move VPE on xulrunner 1.9 or not?
>>> /Maksim Areshkau
>> That beyo8nd xulrunner 1.9 removing features we depend on we now also
>> need someone to maintain the xpcom interfaces...afaik ATF did that before.
> Java XPCOM bridge provided by mozilla, what doing ATF gays - just
> provided a plugin  with this interfaces, if so it's not difficult to do.
>> Who does it now ?
>>
>> /max
> Almost all xpcom interfaces that used by us has frozen status and
> shouldn't changed, so this doesn't needed to change something. 

Hi All,
>From today's N build (N200909010701), ATF is built against XULRunner 1.9
and will not work with older versions.
See here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/atf-dev/msg00600.html

Is it time for us to move on XR1.9?

-- 
Maksim Areshkau


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list