[jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 3.3.0.M5 bits available for QE testing

[Nick Boldt]

It is simply an aggregation of the prebuilt binaries, but if it spins at 
noon and gets AS build #nnn and the aggregate started spinning at 
11:30am and gets AS build #nnn-1, then they won't align.

So, in theory, yes, they'll have the same bits but it's possible to get 
out of synch.

N

On 12/12/2011 11:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> No, introducing a new upstream dep to the Core aggregator or having the
>> Core site be a composite instead of an aggregate would be not be simpler
>> / less error-prone.
>
>>
>> What would be better, however, is if we could guarantee that both sites
>> were built from the same SVN version. Looking at using a new Jenkins
>> Trigger plugin for this.
>>
>
> why isn't the wtp one built from the same exact binaries instead of a rebuild!?!
>
> /max
>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10437
>>
>> N
>>
>> On 12/12/2011 11:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rob and Nick should be able to tell more about what this contains besides just a plain copy of what is published to 3.3.0.M5 ?
>>>>> Nick - any resin why the .webtools is not simply aggregated into / ?
>>>>
>>>> Well, it could be but it's a duplicate of content already in .core, so there'd be no point.
>>>
>>> If it is just an aggregated part of core then less things that could go wrong ;)
>>>
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools&  Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>

-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com