[jbosstools-dev] .drl code completion broken in latest drools ?

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Wed Jun 1 01:02:23 EDT 2011


great!

On Jun 1, 2011, at 24:33, Nick Boldt wrote:

> Job [1] now config'd to use 5.2.0.CR1 in stable branch (and stick w/ SNAPSHOT for trunk).
> 
> [1] https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-drools-5.2_stable_branch
> 
> https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-drools-5.2_stable_branch/241/ finished w/ success.
> 
> Published to site for aggregation into JBT here:
> 
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/jbosstools-drools-5.2_stable_branch/all/repo/features/
> 
> Meanwhile, trunk version is here:
> 
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/jbosstools-drools-5.2_trunk/all/repo/features/
> 
> Let me know if that fixes the issue.
> 
> On 05/31/2011 07:23 AM, Kris Verlaenen wrote:
>> Builds should be picked up from nexus:
>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/org/drools/org.drools.updatesite/5.2.0.CR1/org.drools.updatesite-5.2.0.CR1-assembly.zip
>> 
>> 
>> Geoffrey and Nick have been syncing on this.
>> Afaik there's this hudson job that takes our artefacts from Nexus, does
>> some modifications and puts them somewhere so the JBTools build can pick
>> them up.
>> https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-drools-5.2_stable_branch/
>> 
>> It's probably just a matter of changing that build job VERSION
>> configuration from 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT to 5.2.0.CR1.
>> 
>> Kris
>> 
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Luckily Drools 5.2.x is also on codefreeze ;)
>>>> 
>>>> We released Drools 5.2.0.CR1 last Friday, and final should be
>>>> released end of this week.
>>>> So I would recommend these as stable tags, preferring 5.2.0 final if
>>>> that can still make it in, but the differences should be minimal.
>>> 
>>> 5.2.0.CR1 is what we can take in for our CR1 (building today/tonight)
>>> - we will have a CR2 where we can drag in your final.
>>> 
>>> Currently it seems we are picking it up from your hudson jobs directly
>>> - I assume that is the wrong place then ;)
>>> 
>>> Are you and Nick synced on where he should take bits from and what
>>> builds to use ?
>>> 
>>> /max
>>> 
>>>> Kris
>>>> 
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> I've just tested this with the Drools 5.2.CR1 release and snapshot
>>>>>> and I cannot reproduce this.
>>>>>> Do you know what version of Drools currently is integrated?
>>>>> The version you last told us to integrate with ? :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking at hudson it says we are picking up Drools 5.2-SNAPSHOT
>>>>> which sounds very wrong considering we are in codefreeze since
>>>>> yesterday!!.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brian/Kris ? Which release should we be using for the upcoming
>>>>> release ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> /max
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kris
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>> Kris,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8820
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Worked in previous versions - now it stopped.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is this something that is limited to a very specific use case or
>>>>>>> something that is fixed so we don't have to keep this regression
>>>>>>> around ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> /max
>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen






More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list