[jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Mon Apr 16 08:37:10 EDT 2012


> 16.04.2012 15:21, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon?
>> We are looking to try and be compatible.
>> 
>>> I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins.
>> Again !? Aren't we able to avoid these ?
> Yes, they consolidated of the java resource model  for JAXB and JPA.

So I assume that means a No ?

And they completely broke all public API or is this just related to their internal API ?

/max
> 
> 
>> 
>> Please for now, simply open jiras with problems found and create subtasks/links to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11549
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Max
>> 
>> p.s. I removed all the non-relevant mailing lists and just left jbosstools-dev for these specifics.
>> 
>>> Dmitry
>>> 
>>> 14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno
>>>> is 4.2 - what's 3.8?
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is
>>>> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to
>>>> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think   ;-)
>>>> 13:35
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2
>>>> ready build yet so far as I know
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some
>>>> early stuff
>>>> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked   ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover
>>>> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7
>>>> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be
>>>> CONSIDERED, much less fixed.
>>>> 
>>>> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get
>>>> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but
>>>> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7,
>>>> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had
>>>> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be
>>>> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8.
>>>> 
>>>> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of
>>>> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one.
>>>> 
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
>>>> 
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#comment-12684016
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being
>>>> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in
>>>> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built
>>>> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too).
>>>> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level
>>>> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> More info&   links: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>>>> 
>>>> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> 
> 




More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list