[jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing
Max Rydahl Andersen
max.andersen at redhat.com
Tue Apr 17 11:24:06 EDT 2012
so these things should be mentioned in the change wiki they got.
Could you raise a thread on dali-dev on this and cc me ?
Would like to know if they really just decided to break *all* API's or there is somehow a portability layer somewhere?
/max
On Apr 16, 2012, at 16:23 , Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
> common features version changed from 1.0.0 to 1.2.0
> jpt.jpa features version changed from 3.0.0 to 3.2.0
>
> 16.04.2012 16:48, Max Rydahl Andersen написал:
>> what is the version bump change they did from indigo to juno ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 15:35 , Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
>>
>>> There are 2 issues listed on the page which changes the API.
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277017
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319736
>>>
>>> But not all of the changes are described there. Here are the changes which impact us:
>>>
>>> Classes which were removed?
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.common.utility.model.value.WritablePropertyValueModel;
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.java.JavaStructureNodes;
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.navigator.JpaNavigatorProvider;
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.Table.Owner;
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AnnotationContainer;
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.JavaResourcePersistentAttribute
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.structure.JpaStructureProvider
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedQueriesAnnotation
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedNativeQueriesAnnotation
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AttributeOverridesAnnotation
>>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AssociationOverridesAnnotation
>>>
>>>
>>> Disappeared/moved/renamed
>>> OrmJoinColumn.Owner
>>> JptJpaCorePlugin.rebuildJpaProject(getProject());
>>> JavaPersistentAttribute.getResourcePersistentAttribute()
>>> PersistenceUnit.mappingFileRefsContaining(...)
>>> Persistence.persistenceUnits()
>>> JavaPersistentType.attributes()
>>> JpaJpqlQueryHelper made abstract
>>> JavaGeneratorContainer.Owner
>>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.addAnnotation(int, string, string)
>>> PersistentType.allAttributes()
>>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.annotations(String, String)
>>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.attributes()
>>> and others
>>>
>>> Many public package name changes
>>>
>>> Note: some of them are listed there, but some not. In the list only the changes in public packages.
>>>
>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>> 16.04.2012 15:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> i.e. http://wiki.eclipse.org/New_Help_for_Old_Friends_VII
>>>> mentions nothing of this so if this is anywhere near public API we should raise this ASAP!
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 14:37 , Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> 16.04.2012 15:21, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are looking to try and be compatible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again !? Aren't we able to avoid these ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, they consolidated of the java resource model for JAXB and JPA.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So I assume that means a No ?
>>>>>
>>>>> And they completely broke all public API or is this just related to their internal API ?
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please for now, simply open jiras with problems found and create subtasks/links to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11549
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> p.s. I removed all the non-relevant mailing lists and just left jbosstools-dev for these specifics.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno
>>>>>>>>> is 4.2 - what's 3.8?
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is
>>>>>>>>> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to
>>>>>>>>> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think ;-)
>>>>>>>>> 13:35
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2
>>>>>>>>> ready build yet so far as I know
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some
>>>>>>>>> early stuff
>>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover
>>>>>>>>> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7
>>>>>>>>> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be
>>>>>>>>> CONSIDERED, much less fixed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get
>>>>>>>>> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but
>>>>>>>>> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7,
>>>>>>>>> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had
>>>>>>>>> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be
>>>>>>>>> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of
>>>>>>>>> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#comment-12684016
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being
>>>>>>>>> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in
>>>>>>>>> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built
>>>>>>>>> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too).
>>>>>>>>> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level
>>>>>>>>> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More info& links:
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list