[jbosstools-dev] JBT/JBDS Target Platform for Beta1 -- time to update?

Denis Golovin dgolovin at exadel.com
Mon Jan 30 13:34:51 EST 2012


It is all about right version range in manifest. IMO it should be open range with version from Indigo SR0. Now in most cases dev's just use SR1 and when new dependency added pde adds it as open range with lower version from SR1.

Denis

Denis Golovin <dgolovin at exadel.com> wrote:

>I fixed couple test plugins and now trunk is fine with SR1, but still cannot be compiled against SR0. 
>
>Denis
>
>Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>I think what Denis is saying is that many more than the plugins that relate to JBIDE-9853 is bumped.
>>
>>That's the problem.
>>
>>i.e. none of our plugins have problems running on SR0 on almost any platform just because SWT 86_64 has a runtime issue when starting up.
>>
>>/max
>>
>>On Jan 28, 2012, at 24:54, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> That's because there are bug fixes in SR1 on which we depend.
>>> 
>>> For example, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9853
>>> 
>>> On 01/27/2012 02:22 PM, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>> On 01/27/2012 01:13 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> But I would like to make clear this does *not* mean our code should
>>>>> have hard plugin dependencies on
>>>>> SR2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Still much better if our code install and runs from SR0 and upwards.
>>>> Which is not the case right now. Simple test below fails on as component
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Download
>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.indigo/e370-wtp330.target.zip
>>>> 
>>>> 2. cd to svn workspace with trunk version
>>>> 3. mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip -Dmaven.repo.local=.repository1/
>>>> -Djbosstools-target-site=jar:file///path-to-tp/e370-wtp330.target.zip\!/
>>>> 
>>>> Denis
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> /max
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 21:19, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK, but bear in mind I'll still have to do it again after the SR2
>>>>>> bits are actually in the can.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Pencilling this in for Monday, barring other +1/-1 comments.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 01/26/2012 02:22 PM, Len DiMaggio wrote:
>>>>>>> I'd vote for doing this early - in other words next week. It sounds
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> it's unlikely that there will be a major issue, but if there is a
>>>>>>> problem it's better to find it sooner.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Len
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *From: *"Nick Boldt"<nboldt at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> *To: *external-exadel-list at redhat.com, "jbds-pm-list"
>>>>>>> <jbds-pm-list at redhat.com>, jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:20:39 AM
>>>>>>> *Subject: *JBT/JBDS Target Platform for Beta1 -- time to update?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> About a month ago, I created a new Target Platform [1], [2] for use
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> our trunk builds so we'd be using the latest from Eclipse.org as they
>>>>>>> move toward SR2.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, the first release candidate (RC1) for Eclipse Indigo SR2 was
>>>>>>> dropped. There are 3 more planned on Feb 3, 10 and 17, with GA on Feb
>>>>>>> 24. Chances are there will be little to no changes between now and
>>>>>>> their GA.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would next week be a good time to bump up the TPs to newer content? Or
>>>>>>> should we wait until closer to the Feb 16 code freeze? Bear in mind
>>>>>>> we'll want to update AGAIN before we drop Beta1 so that the bits public
>>>>>>> on eclipse.org will match exactly those against which we built.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Note too that changing the TP DURING a QE cycle will guarantee a respin
>>>>>>> is needed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.indigo.SR1-M/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> http://www.qa.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/updates/jbds-target-platform_3.3.indigo.SR1-M/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>>>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Len DiMaggio (ldimaggi at redhat.com)
>>>>>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>>>> 314 Littleton Road
>>>>>>> Westford, MA 01886 USA
>>>>>>> tel: 978.392.3179
>>>>>>> cell: 781.472.9912
>>>>>>> http://www.redhat.com
>>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/ldimaggio
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <http://www.redhat.com>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>> /max
>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>/max
>>http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>jbosstools-dev mailing list
>jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev



More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list