[jbosstools-dev] Who uses .target file?

Denis Golovin dgolovin at exadel.com
Wed Mar 14 14:07:07 EDT 2012


For me it looks like the speed is up again.

On 03/14/2012 10:56 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> the slowness I see from target is that tycho (at least until 0.13) was much slower against .target than others.
>
> I haven't had time do mvn builds often enough to see how it works in 0.14.
>
> but thats why we created updatesites zips to begin with to make that faster.
> /max
>
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Rob Cernich wrote:
>
>> I agree with Max.  It would be nice if a target file were available.  Right now, the developer must manage his own target platform.  This is compounded by the fact that the base "test" plugins are not available directly from a p2 repository (update site) and must be downloaded and installed separately.
>>
>> As far as the slowness, I believe you only pay that when you setup or update your target platform (as the new dependencies are downloaded and updated).  Same price you pay when updating your local target platform.
>>
>> This would be a really nice feature as it makes it easy to setup a development workspace; saves you from having to find all the dependencies yourself.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> Noone uses it right now since it is not set up as it should be afaik
>>>
>>> I would/want to use it if we enable slide planner mode on it so the
>>> dependencies becomes *deterministic*. They aren't now.
>>>
>>> And then I would like to get target files that I can apply in eclipse
>>> - but the current one is just too big/slow to work.
>>>
>>> Using an updatesite would not help on that either afaik.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This is an important question for us.
>>>> Nick and I are now convinced that .target files are not the panacea
>>>> to drive dependency management at build time. It adds a lot of
>>>> additional steps and it does not work that easily in the Maven
>>>> way. We are thinking of some alternatives way to provide a
>>>> "dependency" repository that would contain only the necessary
>>>> stuff for you to work on your component. Then we'll just manage
>>>> this repository instead of a .target file, it should make our
>>>> daily work better and remove lot of complexity.
>>>> See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10915 and comments
>>>> starting from here
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11157?focusedCommentId=12676643&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12676643
>>>> for more details/debate.
>>>>
>>>> So we more and more think this .target file is useless, and we'd
>>>> like to get rid of it (uselessness is bad). But before that, we'd
>>>> like to know whether some of you do use the generated .target
>>>> file. If yes, we'll have to think on a better way to make everyone
>>>> happy. So if you use .target file, raise your hand!
>>>> --
>>>> Mickael Istria
>>>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
>>>> My blog - My Tweets
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev



More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list