[jbosstools-dev] Who still uses Emma coverage reports?

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

I have not used emma since the jacoco option was there. Just waiting for emma stuff to go away ;)

On 03 Oct 2012, at 15:10, Mickael Istria <mistria at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> Since we've made significant progress over the last months on using Jacoco, and that this should now be easier to consume, given improvements developed as part of https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12742 , I'm wondering if we still require Emma. Are Emma reports still used by anyone of you all? If yes, can you please describe why you prefer Emma reports to Jacoco ones (it's a real question, no intimidation here ;) ?
> Here is how you can access Jacoco reports: https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.component--central/ . Any suggestion to make it more widely used is welcome.
> 
> Emma is technically obsolete compared to Jacoco, and it costs 100 lines of addition in parent pom (more than 10% of the pom) + a folder in currenly messy "build" folder. If no-one uses it, I'd like to remove that stuff to make the parent pom cleaner/simpler.
> 
> Any feedback is highly welcome.
> -- 
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
> My blog - My Tweets
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev