[jbosstools-dev] Why does update/kepler now point to Alpha2 ?

Nick Boldt nboldt at redhat.com
Sat Mar 23 00:41:11 EDT 2013


http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/kepler/compositeArtifacts.xml 
now points at the last RELEASED target platform, 4.30.5.Alpha.

Alpha2 (M5 + Jetty 8) and Alpha3 (Kepler M6 + Atlassian, etc.) won't be 
linked from there until were release JBT 4.1.0.Alpha2.

Sound good?

On 03/21/2013 07:04 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:54:48AM -0400, Nick Boldt wrote:
>> Max:
>>
>> If you look in the git history for
>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-download.jboss.org/commits/master,
>> you'll see my commits. As to pushing files from github to
>> download.jboss.org, there's a sync job for that but it only fires a
>> few times a day.
>>
>> The Alpha1 released bits and Alpha2-SNAPSHOT bits are nearly the same.
>> The only difference is the unannounced change which added Jetty 8
>> stuff (JBIDE-13736). History is here:
>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-target-platforms/commits/4.30.x
>
> so we are back at again pushing stuff into our TP without announcement
> and putting it live - please stop doing that. Thanks!
>
>
>> If you prefer I can set updates/kepler/ to point at Alpha1 released
>> bits (it was previously pointing at the Alpha1-SNAPSHOT bits), and
>> Alpha2-SNAPSHOT will be the full Kepler M6 set of changes I announced
>> earlier this week. Or, we can make the new M6 TP called
>> Alpha3-SNAPSHOT to differentiate it from this KeplerM5+Jetty8.19
>> variation. Personally, I prefer that, but YMMV.
>
> I prefer we don't point updates/kepler to snapshot/unannounced/untested
> content.
>
> The whole point of the snapshot/release model we've been discussing is
> to stop these under the covers TP movements.
>
> /max
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> (2013-03-20 20:26:39) maxandersen: nickboldt: stupid question but why
>> is kepler now updated to alpha2 before we released alpha2 ?!
>> (2013-03-20 20:26:56) maxandersen: i.e.
>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-download.jboss.org/pull/105/files
>>
>> (2013-03-20 20:29:40) maxandersen: and nickboldt I can see dgolovin
>> applied
>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-download.jboss.org/pull/102
>> but not seeing the effect on download.jboss.org ….did we miss to kick
>> up a sync somewhere?
>>
>> On 03/20/2013 09:03 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> I noticed tonight that downloads.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/kepler/
>>> now points to
>>> Alpha2-snapshot.
>>>
>>> Isn't this site referenced by our /development site where there is
>>> alpha1 that is not tested against alpha2?
>>>
>>> ps. tried investigate with https://github.com/ifedorenko/p2-browser
>>> but that seems to no longer launch with neither java6 nor java7 :(
>>>
>>> /max
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com

-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list