[jbosstools-dev] Proposed change to JBT target platform 4.40.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT: PowerMock

[Jeff Cantrill]

Max,

Reference https://github.com/jcantrill/jbosstools-openshift/commits/jbide_17919_snapshot_file_name_not_refreshed for how I used it to resolve the issue.  In regards to the importance, I don't really have a context to the schedule or priority.  I suspect, however, the request could wait as the issue I resolved was identified as low priority; I pulled it from the queue in order to get my feet wet with the source code. 

The alternative would be to split the change into test and code and push the tests in a later commit.  This is not ideal IMO but it would eliminate the dependency in the short term. 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse at redhat.com>
To: "Mickael Istria" <mistria at redhat.com>
Cc: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:20:18 AM
Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Proposed change to JBT target platform 4.40.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT: PowerMock

On 20 Aug 2014, at 9:11, Mickael Istria wrote:

> On 08/20/2014 09:09 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> we are in CR phase - why are adding powermock at this time ?
> I let you discuss with Jeff Cantrill about how much goodness it 
> provides and conclude whether we include it or not (so whether we also 
> include Jeff's patches or not).

I definitely can see its goodness - but I we have issues like 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-14315 with Mockito that makes 
changing its version and change where it and this powermock comes from 
problematic.

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev