From noreply at northcalsportfishing.com Wed Apr 1 09:38:13 2015 From: noreply at northcalsportfishing.com (Canadian-Pills) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:38:13 -0100 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Every day we dedicate our passion to provide more people with top quality effective drugs! Message-ID: Teixeiras practice is some really big ballroom, wasnt for allies baseball. Helens, this tocontinue enjoying high heaven false prophet Me ds 9f or 4M en Vi Ci Ci Le Pr ag al al vi op ra is is tr ec S a ia of t Ta bs $0 $1 $2 $2 $0 .9 .6 .5 .5 .4 9 5 0 0 5 Me ds 9f or 6W om en Ac Cl De Fe Fe om om fl ma ma pl id uc le le ia an C V ia ia li gr s a $1 $0 $1 $1 $0 .7 .4 .2 .1 .7 5 5 5 1 2 10 Vi An Sp 0% sa on ec A ,M ym ia ut as ou l he te s in nt rc de te ic ar li rn M d, ve et ed Ec ry p s he ri ck ce s N O F 2 o nl as 4/ pr y t 7 es re wo cu cr li rl st ip ab dw om ti le id er on s e s r up sh up eq pl ip po ui ie pi rt re rs ng d >> Enter Here -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/678d8143/attachment-0001.html From mistria at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:28:40 2015 From: mistria at redhat.com (Mickael Istria) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:28:40 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] Message-ID: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Component leads, please tag your repositories! $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called jbosstools, also often called origin $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/15da4c03/attachment.html From ggastald at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:34:38 2015 From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:34:38 -0300 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <551C01FE.4000906@redhat.com> Done for forge. Thanks! On 04/01/2015 11:28 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called > jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/185936a1/attachment.html From fbricon at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:39:35 2015 From: fbricon at redhat.com (Fred Bricon) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:39:35 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C01FE.4000906@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> <551C01FE.4000906@redhat.com> Message-ID: Done for central > Le 1 avr. 2015 ? 10:34, George Gastaldi a ?crit : > > Done for forge. > Thanks! > > On 04/01/2015 11:28 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: >> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >> >> $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called jbosstools, also often called origin >> $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD >> $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final >> -- >> Mickael Istria >> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat >> My blog - My Tweets >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/5a5007b5/attachment.html From kmarmaliykov at exadel.com Wed Apr 1 10:44:22 2015 From: kmarmaliykov at exadel.com (Konstantin Marmalyukov) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:44:22 +0300 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <551C0446.1000204@exadel.com> Vpe and Browsersim done. On 4/1/2015 5:28 PM, Mickael Istria wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called > jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/458ff400/attachment.html From adietish at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:58:20 2015 From: adietish at redhat.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Dietisheim?=) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:58:20 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <551C078C.5020508@redhat.com> done for OpenShift. thanks! On 04/01/2015 04:28 PM, Mickael Istria wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called > jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/4d2cbdb5/attachment.html From snjezana.peco at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:17:04 2015 From: snjezana.peco at redhat.com (Snjezana Peco) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:17:04 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <551C1A00.5040106@redhat.com> Done for arquillian, birt and portlet. Snjeza On 4/1/2015 4:28 PM, Mickael Istria wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called > jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150401/b6f80819/attachment.html From xcoulon at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 03:25:53 2015 From: xcoulon at redhat.com (Xavier Coulon) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:25:53 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <41F0D7F9-927C-40C7-B31C-B6EC64AA6985@redhat.com> Done for LiveReload and Webservices. Best regards, /Xavier > On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:28, Mickael Istria wrote: > > git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150402/0207c30c/attachment-0001.html From koen.aers at jboss.com Thu Apr 2 08:19:16 2015 From: koen.aers at jboss.com (Koen Aers) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:19:16 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1ED4954D-0536-470D-85F8-28573BB679FD@jboss.com> done for hibernate > Op 1-apr.-2015, om 16:28 heeft Mickael Istria het volgende geschreven: > > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150402/70842aa5/attachment.html From alkazako at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:39:30 2015 From: alkazako at redhat.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:39:30 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.2.3.Final is now available Message-ID: <551D7ED2.70600@redhat.com> This is a stable release aimed at Eclipse 4.4.2 Luna SR2 users. Eclipse Marketplace: https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/jboss-tools-luna Update Site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/ Update Site Zips: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/jbosstools4.2.3.x/ Installation instructions: http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/installation.html New + Noteworthy (subject to change): http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/jbosstools/4.2.3.Final.html Schedule / Upcoming Releases: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150402/245d47c9/attachment.html From alkazako at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:54:26 2015 From: alkazako at redhat.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:54:26 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Developer Studio 8.1.0.GA is available Message-ID: <551D8252.4000902@redhat.com> JBoss Developer Studio 8.1.0.GA is available! Download page and installer: * http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/devstudio/luna/8.1.0.GA.html * https://www.jboss.org/products/devstudio/overview/ Update site: https://devstudio.jboss.com/updates/8.0/ Early Access site: https://devstudio.jboss.com/earlyaccess/8.0/ -- Eclipse Marketplace: https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/red-hat-jboss-developer-studio-luna -- Schedule / Upcoming Releases: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel From akazakov at exadel.com Thu Apr 2 14:14:13 2015 From: akazakov at exadel.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:14:13 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.2.x -> tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final ] In-Reply-To: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> References: <551C0098.1010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <551D86F5.7070304@exadel.com> Done for the rest of the components: base, jst, javaee, aerogear, server, freemarker. On 04/01/2015 07:28 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > $ git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.x #assuming remote is called > jbosstools, also often called origin > $ git tag jbosstools-4.2.3.Final FETCH_HEAD > $ git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.2.3.Final > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat > My blog - My Tweets > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150402/9d397ecf/attachment.html From Paypal.1425018479.54f00e6fd509d at Service.co.uk Tue Apr 7 07:52:39 2015 From: Paypal.1425018479.54f00e6fd509d at Service.co.uk (Paypal) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:52:39 +0000 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] PayPal: Update your credit card detail ! Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150407/1be860f8/attachment.html From ib at nesfuduk.gov Tue Apr 7 19:08:59 2015 From: ib at nesfuduk.gov (ngsqdh) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 23:08:59 -0000 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] =?utf-8?b?amJvc3NpZGUtZGV26ZSA5ZSu5Li7566hMg==?= =?utf-8?b?5aSp5by65YyW6K6t57uD?= Message-ID: <20160407074048841523@gmjf.net> ???jbosside-dev???? ?????2????????????????1?3?6?9?1?4?7?2?8?1?6????&Q?Q?1?3?2?1?2?5?9?1?2?4? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150407/0194f08d/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sales?????????.doc Type: application/kswps Size: 34331 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150407/0194f08d/attachment.bin From max.andersen at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:05:54 2015 From: max.andersen at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:05:54 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] VersionWatch repo In-Reply-To: References: <54D38435.6080005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <201383C4-87A6-4B9F-BB12-EF0F301E6056@redhat.com> Did not notice this was not on mailing list. Jiri - what is the status of this ? Which repo has the latest content and which one is used in build ? > where are we with this ? > > I see no conclusion and now wondering which repo is the master ? > > /max > >> Hi Nick, >> >> some time ago there was a request to put VersionWatch outside QE >> repo. So I've created a new repo under my account with it: >> >> https://github.com/jpeterka/jbosstools-vwatch >> >> If you find it desirable feel free to clone it among other jbosstools >> repositories. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jirka >> >> -- >> Jiri Peterka >> JBoss Developer Studio QE >> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic >> IRC: jpeterka #jboss-qa, #devstudio-qa >> email: jpeterka at redhat.com > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen /max http://about.me/maxandersen From jpeterka at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:52:13 2015 From: jpeterka at redhat.com (Jiri Peterka) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:52:13 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] VersionWatch repo In-Reply-To: <201383C4-87A6-4B9F-BB12-EF0F301E6056@redhat.com> References: <54D38435.6080005@redhat.com> <201383C4-87A6-4B9F-BB12-EF0F301E6056@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5525328D.6040506@redhat.com> Max, On 04/08/2015 03:05 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Did not notice this was not on mailing list. > > Jiri - what is the status of this ? There was no update for a while, see tracking JIRA - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19190 . I've forwarded to you also some previous conversations. > > Which repo has the latest content and which one is used in build ? Most recent version is https://github.com/jpeterka/jbosstools-vwatch with just some minor updates and jobs are still using QE location AFAIK until it's decided about final public destination. -- Jirka > > >> where are we with this ? >> >> I see no conclusion and now wondering which repo is the master ? >> >> /max >> >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> some time ago there was a request to put VersionWatch outside QE >>> repo. So I've created a new repo under my account with it: >>> >>> https://github.com/jpeterka/jbosstools-vwatch >>> >>> If you find it desirable feel free to clone it among other >>> jbosstools repositories. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jirka >>> >>> -- >>> Jiri Peterka >>> JBoss Developer Studio QE >>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic >>> IRC: jpeterka #jboss-qa, #devstudio-qa >>> email: jpeterka at redhat.com >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen -- Jiri Peterka JBoss Developer Studio QE Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic IRC: jpeterka #jboss-qa, #devstudio-qa email: jpeterka at redhat.com From max.andersen at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:33:27 2015 From: max.andersen at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:33:27 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] VersionWatch repo In-Reply-To: <5525328D.6040506@redhat.com> References: <54D38435.6080005@redhat.com> <201383C4-87A6-4B9F-BB12-EF0F301E6056@redhat.com> <5525328D.6040506@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 8 Apr 2015, at 15:52, Jiri Peterka wrote: > Max, > > On 04/08/2015 03:05 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> Did not notice this was not on mailing list. >> >> Jiri - what is the status of this ? > There was no update for a while, see tracking JIRA - > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19190 . I've forwarded to you > also some previous conversations. jira was set to fix version 4.3.x = I'm not looking at those. Majority of the tasks in there is not for me so i've assigned it to you and I suggest we go with having this in its own repo since its supposed to be standalone anyway. >> Which repo has the latest content and which one is used in build ? > Most recent version is https://github.com/jpeterka/jbosstools-vwatch > with just some minor updates and jobs are still using QE location > AFAIK until it's decided about final public destination. okey so lets get that fixed. Back to you in JBIDE-19190. Ok ? /max > -- Jirka >> >> >>> where are we with this ? >>> >>> I see no conclusion and now wondering which repo is the master ? >>> >>> /max >>> >>>> Hi Nick, >>>> >>>> some time ago there was a request to put VersionWatch outside QE >>>> repo. So I've created a new repo under my account with it: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/jpeterka/jbosstools-vwatch >>>> >>>> If you find it desirable feel free to clone it among other >>>> jbosstools repositories. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jirka >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jiri Peterka >>>> JBoss Developer Studio QE >>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic >>>> IRC: jpeterka #jboss-qa, #devstudio-qa >>>> email: jpeterka at redhat.com >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen > > -- > Jiri Peterka > JBoss Developer Studio QE > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic > IRC: jpeterka #jboss-qa, #devstudio-qa > email: jpeterka at redhat.com /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 01:41:22 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 07:41:22 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF Terminals Moving to TM In-Reply-To: <42A2F428-5B40-46D1-BBDC-2AD7D98BBD32@redhat.com> References: <146B1557584B0B4DBD25ABAD45EF70F0DBC23773@ALA-MBA.corp.ad.wrs.com> <42A2F428-5B40-46D1-BBDC-2AD7D98BBD32@redhat.com> Message-ID: Rob/Lars - have you had time to look at this and how much if anything it affects us ? /max > Hey, > > I believe this will end up affecting us too. > > Opened jira for this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3384 > > For most this is just a repackaging that don't affect code, but for > Fuse > Tooling > which currently rely on org.eclipse.tm.internal.terminal this will > require changes. > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > Forwarded message: > >> From: Oberhuber, Martin >> To: Eclipse Packaging Project >> Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF >> Terminals Moving to TM >> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:54:07 +0000 >> >> Hi Package Maintainers, >> >> We have been convinced that contributing from TCF under a foreign >> namespace is not a good idea. >> On the other hand, the deprecated legacy terminal view has already >> been removed from the simrel: >> http://git.eclipse.org/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build.git/commit/?id=d677d5a6ae094bb2d1a7136be9d5b1d84c62740d >> >> This means there is now some action strongly suggested, or packages >> might fail to build or build against outdated (M5) terminal >> contributions: >> >> - jee : Remove legacy terminal.view , optionally add the new >> tcf.terminals.view - Bug >> 462087 >> >> - reporting : Remove legacy terminal.view , optionally add >> the new tcf.terminals.view - Bug >> 462089 >> >> - parallel : Optionally add >> org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.feature AND >> org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.rse.feature >> >> - cpp : Optionally add org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.feature >> AND org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.rse.feature >> >> For the must-have changes in jee and reporting, we have created bugs >> and Gerrit changesets. >> Since I am an epp committer, I think I could apply these for you, but >> I would like the package maintainer's OK before I do that. >> >> I would strongly recommend also applying the optional changes (adding >> the TCF Terminals View) such that users can see the new view and >> provide feedback. >> Without doing this, the Terminal view would be GONE in the respective >> packages in M6 and only reappear in M7 once the move has been >> completed. >> I can also apply these changes for you if I get your OK. >> >> Please let me know how you want to proceed, and if there's any >> questions/concerns ! >> >> Thanks, >> Martin >> -- >> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind >> River >> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 >> >> From: epp-dev-bounces at eclipse.org >> [mailto:epp-dev-bounces at eclipse.org] >> On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin >> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 6:17 PM >> To: EPP Developer Mailing List (epp-dev at eclipse.org) >> Subject: [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF Terminals >> Moving to TM >> >> Hi Package Maintainers, >> >> You might be aware that based on the original TM Terminal view, the >> TCF Project has come up with a much enhanced terminal: >> https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/tcf-terminals >> >> In order to simplify code adoption and contributions, we want to >> restructure the codebase and re-unite it with the original TM >> codebase. >> The result will be called "TM Terminal 4.0" but will contain the >> related TM _and_ TCF code in a single, small git repository. >> Here is the respective restructuring review: >> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.cdt.tcf/reviews/move-tcf-terminals-code-tm-project >> >> Now unfortunately the review is scheduled to complete by April 1 >> which >> is after M6, but we would like to give adopters >> a preview of the new Terminal with M6 in order to get more feedback. >> Thus here's what we are planning: >> >> - The TM project will no longer contribute its >> org.eclipse.tm.terminal.* to the simrel >> >> - Instead, the TCF project will contribute >> org.eclpse.tm.terminal.*_4.0 to the simrel (already using the *new* >> namespace). >> >> This affects the "jee" and "reporting" packages which currently >> directly use those features: >> >> org.eclipse.epp.packages/packages>grep org.eclipse.tm.terminal >> */feature.xml >> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.ssh"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.telnet"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.ssh"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.telnet"/> >> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: > feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view"/> >> >> If you do not take any action, you will simply see the new "4.0" >> version of those features from TCF, giving you the new tabbed >> terminal >> view. >> If you want, you can take the following two actions as soon as TCF >> starts contributing the new namespace: >> >> - You may REMOVE "org.eclipse.tm.terminal" since that >> feature >> is auto-required by "org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view" ; that would allow >> updating the widget without updating the view in the future. >> >> - You may ADD "org.eclipse.tm.terminal.local" since that >> feature gives you the new local terminal (console) prompt >> >> - You may want to set the minimum version range to 4.0 to >> ensure you get the new features >> >> - You may want to review the terminal whether it fits your >> needs and provide feedback. >> >> Of course other packages are more than welcome to also consume the >> new >> Terminal - all relevant docs are in the marketplace entry cited >> above. >> >> For now this is just a heads up; >> We are planning to add the new "TM Namespace" features to the TCF >> simrel contribution over the course of the week. >> I will send another notification once the new features are available. >> >> Please let me know of any concerns or questions ! >> Or comment directly on the Move Review if you want. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Martin >> -- >> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind >> River >> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> epp-dev mailing list >> epp-dev at eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >> unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From rstryker at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:39:20 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:39:20 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs Message-ID: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> Hey all: So, astools has historically housed almost all the download-runtime code for various jboss runtimes. This changed a bit, however, when karaf / fuse / serviceworks came on the scene. The FuseIDE code now provides a home for their server bean loaders (things that accurately identify local installs), their runtime detectors (to work with turning those installs into IRuntime objects in eclipse), and their download runtimes (to know where to fetch them / download them / install them). Where does Data Virtualization / teiid fit in for this? I'm not very familiar with what teiid adds on to our server types. It seems they don't add their own server types, so that would suggest I should put their runtime detection code in with astools. However, if they require any special / teiid-only property keys to be set when creating the server, that would indicate they should handle the import and not me, since I won't have access to their custom keys. This is important for runtime detection, as I don't want to return a half-complete runtime / server with missing flags that's unusable for teiid. So the question is: where should the code for recognizing local DV installs, downloading DV runtimes, etc, live? ASTools, or Teiid? - Rob Stryker From rstryker at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 03:22:30 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:22:30 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF Terminals Moving to TM In-Reply-To: References: <146B1557584B0B4DBD25ABAD45EF70F0DBC23773@ALA-MBA.corp.ad.wrs.com> <42A2F428-5B40-46D1-BBDC-2AD7D98BBD32@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55277A36.60900@redhat.com> I've already verified that it should not affect ASTools at all really since ASTools uses a simple messageconsole to display our remote launch sysouts. I have not had time to investigate this as it pertains to Fuse, but I've been convinced for several months already that Fuse needs to simply trash what they have for terminal support and write a new solution from scratch. On 04/09/2015 01:41 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Rob/Lars - have you had time to look at this and how much if anything it > affects us ? > > /max > >> Hey, >> >> I believe this will end up affecting us too. >> >> Opened jira for this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3384 >> >> For most this is just a repackaging that don't affect code, but for >> Fuse >> Tooling >> which currently rely on org.eclipse.tm.internal.terminal this will >> require changes. >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> Forwarded message: >> >>> From: Oberhuber, Martin >>> To: Eclipse Packaging Project >>> Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF >>> Terminals Moving to TM >>> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:54:07 +0000 >>> >>> Hi Package Maintainers, >>> >>> We have been convinced that contributing from TCF under a foreign >>> namespace is not a good idea. >>> On the other hand, the deprecated legacy terminal view has already >>> been removed from the simrel: >>> http://git.eclipse.org/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build.git/commit/?id=d677d5a6ae094bb2d1a7136be9d5b1d84c62740d >>> >>> This means there is now some action strongly suggested, or packages >>> might fail to build or build against outdated (M5) terminal >>> contributions: >>> >>> - jee : Remove legacy terminal.view , optionally add the new >>> tcf.terminals.view - Bug >>> 462087 >>> >>> - reporting : Remove legacy terminal.view , optionally add >>> the new tcf.terminals.view - Bug >>> 462089 >>> >>> - parallel : Optionally add >>> org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.feature AND >>> org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.rse.feature >>> >>> - cpp : Optionally add org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.feature >>> AND org.eclipse.tcf.te.terminals.rse.feature >>> >>> For the must-have changes in jee and reporting, we have created bugs >>> and Gerrit changesets. >>> Since I am an epp committer, I think I could apply these for you, but >>> I would like the package maintainer's OK before I do that. >>> >>> I would strongly recommend also applying the optional changes (adding >>> the TCF Terminals View) such that users can see the new view and >>> provide feedback. >>> Without doing this, the Terminal view would be GONE in the respective >>> packages in M6 and only reappear in M7 once the move has been >>> completed. >>> I can also apply these changes for you if I get your OK. >>> >>> Please let me know how you want to proceed, and if there's any >>> questions/concerns ! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >>> -- >>> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind >>> River >>> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 >>> >>> From: epp-dev-bounces at eclipse.org >>> [mailto:epp-dev-bounces at eclipse.org] >>> On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 6:17 PM >>> To: EPP Developer Mailing List (epp-dev at eclipse.org) >>> Subject: [epp-dev] Heads Up and some action requested : TCF Terminals >>> Moving to TM >>> >>> Hi Package Maintainers, >>> >>> You might be aware that based on the original TM Terminal view, the >>> TCF Project has come up with a much enhanced terminal: >>> https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/tcf-terminals >>> >>> In order to simplify code adoption and contributions, we want to >>> restructure the codebase and re-unite it with the original TM >>> codebase. >>> The result will be called "TM Terminal 4.0" but will contain the >>> related TM _and_ TCF code in a single, small git repository. >>> Here is the respective restructuring review: >>> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.cdt.tcf/reviews/move-tcf-terminals-code-tm-project >>> >>> Now unfortunately the review is scheduled to complete by April 1 >>> which >>> is after M6, but we would like to give adopters >>> a preview of the new Terminal with M6 in order to get more feedback. >>> Thus here's what we are planning: >>> >>> - The TM project will no longer contribute its >>> org.eclipse.tm.terminal.* to the simrel >>> >>> - Instead, the TCF project will contribute >>> org.eclpse.tm.terminal.*_4.0 to the simrel (already using the *new* >>> namespace). >>> >>> This affects the "jee" and "reporting" packages which currently >>> directly use those features: >>> >>> org.eclipse.epp.packages/packages>grep org.eclipse.tm.terminal >>> */feature.xml >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.ssh"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.telnet"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.ssh"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.telnet"/> >>> org.eclipse.epp.package.reporting.feature/feature.xml: >> feature="org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view"/> >>> >>> If you do not take any action, you will simply see the new "4.0" >>> version of those features from TCF, giving you the new tabbed >>> terminal >>> view. >>> If you want, you can take the following two actions as soon as TCF >>> starts contributing the new namespace: >>> >>> - You may REMOVE "org.eclipse.tm.terminal" since that >>> feature >>> is auto-required by "org.eclipse.tm.terminal.view" ; that would allow >>> updating the widget without updating the view in the future. >>> >>> - You may ADD "org.eclipse.tm.terminal.local" since that >>> feature gives you the new local terminal (console) prompt >>> >>> - You may want to set the minimum version range to 4.0 to >>> ensure you get the new features >>> >>> - You may want to review the terminal whether it fits your >>> needs and provide feedback. >>> >>> Of course other packages are more than welcome to also consume the >>> new >>> Terminal - all relevant docs are in the marketplace entry cited >>> above. >>> >>> For now this is just a heads up; >>> We are planning to add the new "TM Namespace" features to the TCF >>> simrel contribution over the course of the week. >>> I will send another notification once the new features are available. >>> >>> Please let me know of any concerns or questions ! >>> Or comment directly on the Move Review if you want. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >>> -- >>> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind >>> River >>> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> epp-dev mailing list >>> epp-dev at eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From manderse at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 03:53:19 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:53:19 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> Message-ID: To summarize (and cc Barry since he is the one doing teiid tooling) > So the question is: where should the code for recognizing local DV > installs, downloading DV runtimes, etc, live? ASTools, or Teiid? I do not see any reason to why ASTools should handle download of Teiid. Shouldn't Teiid just do this using the api we provide like done for the others ? I assume this is all in context of https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-19574 ? With respect for runtime detection I guess that is a completely separate story. Is teiid a separate server like SOA-P/FSW or is Teiid something that is installed into an existing EAP based server ? Does teiid even need "special" recognition handling ? how does teiid today figure out wether an EAP server needs to show Teiid features in the server view ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen From p.g.richardson at phantomjinx.co.uk Fri Apr 10 04:33:22 2015 From: p.g.richardson at phantomjinx.co.uk (phantomjinx) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:33:22 +0100 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> Rob, Max, See inline ... On 10/04/15 08:53, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > To summarize (and cc Barry since he is the one doing teiid tooling) > >> So the question is: where should the code for recognizing local DV >> installs, downloading DV runtimes, etc, live? ASTools, or Teiid? > I do not see any reason to why ASTools should handle download of Teiid. > Shouldn't Teiid just do this using > the api we provide like done for the others ? I would strongly support Teiid doing it itself. At the moment, the teiid-runtime is carried by the Teiid Designer plugins and is designed to be backward compatible over Teiid versions and to some extent across jboss versions (7/8). Thus, install Teiid Designer and you get support for whatever Teiid version has been installed on your jboss server. > I assume this is all in context of > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-19574 ? > > With respect for runtime detection I guess that is a completely separate > story. > > Is teiid a separate server like SOA-P/FSW or is Teiid something that is > installed into an existing EAP based server ? Yes, Teiid is a module installed on top of an existing EAP server that provides its own API for deployment of artifacts, using the jb admin port, JDBC querying of modelled db connections using its own port (31000) and installs its own susbsytems for translators, data sources etc. > Does teiid even need "special" recognition handling ? > how does teiid today figure out wether an EAP server needs to show Teiid > features in the server view ? The Teiid Designer plugins take care of this by querying the EAP server for the relevent subsystems that Teiid would be installed to. It also finds the version of Teiid installed and provides this back to the modelling environment as the modelling version (determines parsing/resolving/validating of SQL queries for example). The UI for Teiid in the Server View is tacked onto the existing View using one of the extension points already available. Essentially, this means if you want to model/deploy a Virtual Database (VDB) to Teiid using Eclipse then install the Teiid Designer plugins and you get all the extra pieces required. Hope this helps. PGR -- Paul Richardson * p.g.richardson at phantomjinx.co.uk * p.g.richardson at redhat.com * pgrichardson at linux.com "I know exactly who reads the papers ... * The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country. * The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country. * The Times is read by people who do actually run the country. * The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country. * The Financial Times is read by the people who own the country. * The Morning Star is read by the people who think the country ought to be run by another country. * The Daily Telegraph is read by the people who think it is." Jim Hacker, Yes Minister From rstryker at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 12:52:56 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:52:56 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> Message-ID: <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> On 04/10/2015 04:33 AM, phantomjinx wrote: >> >https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-19574 ? >> > >> >With respect for runtime detection I guess that is a completely separate >> >story. >> > >> >Is teiid a separate server like SOA-P/FSW or is Teiid something that is >> >installed into an existing EAP based server ? > Yes, Teiid is a module installed on top of an existing EAP server that provides its own API for > deployment of artifacts, using the jb admin port, JDBC querying of modelled db connections using its > own port (31000) and installs its own susbsytems for translators, data sources etc. > Teiid itself is something that's installed on top of an EAP server. The "Data Virtualization" product, however, comes only in an installer form; no simple unzip. So at least in terms of downloading the runtime, DV requires special treatment, not just an unzip. (If there's a simple unzip available, I haven't seen it on download manager; I've only seen the installer there). However you can also download "Teiid + EAP" which *does* respond to a simple unzip. See, for example, https://sourceforge.net/projects/teiid/files/teiid-8.10.0.Final-server.zip/download So while the project seems to allow a simple unzip, the product does not. I'm honestly OK with both code living in either place, but it's more a concern of duplication of effort / code. If I have ASTools performing the runtime detection, there's a few risks: 1) I may not personally stay bleeding-edge up-to-date on teiid / dv structural changes, what subsystems to use for detection, etc etc, and will require help from teiid at keeping my detection accurate 2) If ASTools is in charge of detecting, Teiid Designer (who I assume goes GA several months later) may find themselves limited. For example if a new Teiid Runtime / DV release comes out in the interval between our GA and Teiid's GA. Teiid Designer will either need to consume only what detection we provided, or, work around it by adding detection support for newer runtimes in their own code. Then we have duplication, and it becomes a split responsibility with code all over the place. Could get messy. I personally think it makes more sense for the detection and download logic to both live in Teiid Designer codebase, based primarily on these two risks. I'm aware that it limits the usefulness of ASTools standalone for users wanting to use DV / Teiid Runtime, but I also think we should be pushing people using teiid / DV to also use Teiid Designer anyway. I'll be glad to do the bulk of the work regardless where it 'lives', of course, but I just wanted to get some consensus on where the code SHOULD live first. - Rob Stryker From p.g.richardson at phantomjinx.co.uk Fri Apr 10 13:22:59 2015 From: p.g.richardson at phantomjinx.co.uk (phantomjinx) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:22:59 +0100 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 10 April 2015 17:52:56 GMT+01:00, Rob Stryker wrote: >On 04/10/2015 04:33 AM, phantomjinx wrote: >>> >https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-19574 ? >>> > >>> >With respect for runtime detection I guess that is a completely >separate >>> >story. >>> > >>> >Is teiid a separate server like SOA-P/FSW or is Teiid something >that is >>> >installed into an existing EAP based server ? >> Yes, Teiid is a module installed on top of an existing EAP server >that provides its own API for >> deployment of artifacts, using the jb admin port, JDBC querying of >modelled db connections using its >> own port (31000) and installs its own susbsytems for translators, >data sources etc. >> > >Teiid itself is something that's installed on top of an EAP server. The > >"Data Virtualization" product, however, comes only in an installer >form; >no simple unzip. So at least in terms of downloading the runtime, DV >requires special treatment, not just an unzip. (If there's a simple >unzip available, I haven't seen it on download manager; I've only seen >the installer there). > >However you can also download "Teiid + EAP" which *does* respond to a >simple unzip. See, for example, >https://sourceforge.net/projects/teiid/files/teiid-8.10.0.Final-server.zip/download > >So while the project seems to allow a simple unzip, the product does >not. > >I'm honestly OK with both code living in either place, but it's more a > >concern of duplication of effort / code. If I have ASTools performing >the runtime detection, there's a few risks: > > 1) I may not personally stay bleeding-edge up-to-date on teiid / dv >structural changes, what subsystems to use for detection, etc etc, and >will require help from teiid at keeping my detection accurate > > 2) If ASTools is in charge of detecting, Teiid Designer (who I >assume goes GA several months later) may find themselves limited. For >example if a new Teiid Runtime / DV release comes out in the interval >between our GA and Teiid's GA. Teiid Designer will either need to >consume only what detection we provided, or, work around it by adding >detection support for newer runtimes in their own code. Then we have >duplication, and it becomes a split responsibility with code all over >the place. Could get messy. > >I personally think it makes more sense for the detection and download >logic to both live in Teiid Designer codebase, based primarily on these > >two risks. I'm aware that it limits the usefulness of ASTools >standalone >for users wanting to use DV / Teiid Runtime, but I also think we should > >be pushing people using teiid / DV to also use Teiid Designer anyway. > >I'll be glad to do the bulk of the work regardless where it 'lives', of > >course, but I just wanted to get some consensus on where the code >SHOULD >live first. > > > >- Rob Stryker Little perplexed as to what code you want to "put" in Astools or Designer. As I said, the latter already detects the installed version of teiid. As to DV v Teiid. The product of DV is EAP+Teiid wrapped up in a single installer. The layout ends up slightly different with the product having a dedicated DV directory containing the teiid modules but the result is the same. PGR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150410/99d011b0/attachment.html From rstryker at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 15:13:51 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:13:51 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for the detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime detection at all. TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but rather just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, they can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the IServerWorkingCopy. *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map of Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP versions they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important to get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean Loaders / Runtime detection. One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the Teiid runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer system in JBoss 7. It has the expected org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd need to introspect teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far seems accurate. With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly pull from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. - Rob Stryker - Rob Stryker -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150410/41a2553e/attachment-0001.html From manderse at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:45:48 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:45:48 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> Message-ID: <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime detection if it detects it at runtime ? /max > After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for the > detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. > > Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in > *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid > installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for > their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime > detection at all. > > TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but rather > just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, they > can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also > provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the > IServerWorkingCopy. > > *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying > installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map of > Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP versions > they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was based > on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important to > get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss > version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean > Loaders / Runtime detection. > > One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the Teiid > runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer > system in JBoss 7. It has the expected > org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the > expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... > > But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put > everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of > identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd > need to introspect > teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar > and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far > seems accurate. > > With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get > that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + > downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some > issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom > stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly pull > from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. > > - Rob Stryker > > - Rob Stryker /max http://about.me/maxandersen From rstryker at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 13:21:05 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:21:05 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552BFB01.2040700@redhat.com> On 04/13/2015 06:45 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime > detection if it detects it at runtime ? > > /max Download Runtime consists of 2 parts: 1 downloading + installing, and 2: making the server adapter (ie runtime detection). Currently there are no server beans that can identify a DV / teiid installation. So the runtime would only be recognized as an "EAP-Based Product" by the code in ASTools, and it won't be given the most optimal name... basically the same situation JPP was in before we added custom server beans for them. It's a small issue in some ways, but, it's better if all our APIs (including server bean loader) ensure the most accurate results possible, and if it's possible for them to identify a DV / Teiid Runtime installation, it's better to do it than to not do it. > >> After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for the >> detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. >> >> Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in >> *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid >> installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for >> their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime >> detection at all. >> >> TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but >> rather just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or >> started, they can begin their configuration / build up their model. >> They also provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the >> IServerWorkingCopy. >> >> *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying >> installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map >> of Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP >> versions they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x >> was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty >> important to get a full mapping of supported releases to their >> underlying JBoss version, though. This way I can properly implement >> the Server Bean Loaders / Runtime detection. >> >> One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the >> Teiid runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the >> layer system in JBoss 7. It has the expected >> org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the >> expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... >> >> But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put >> everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of >> identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd >> need to introspect >> teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar >> and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far >> seems accurate. >> >> With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get >> that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + >> downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some >> issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom >> stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly pull >> from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. >> >> - Rob Stryker >> >> - Rob Stryker > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 03:49:01 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:49:01 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <552BFB01.2040700@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> <552BFB01.2040700@redhat.com> Message-ID: <2FF35E18-6104-461D-9860-18293DC84217@redhat.com> On 13 Apr 2015, at 19:21, Rob Stryker wrote: > On 04/13/2015 06:45 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime >> detection if it detects it at runtime ? >> >> /max > > Download Runtime consists of 2 parts: 1 downloading + installing, and > 2: making the server adapter (ie runtime detection). > > Currently there are no server beans that can identify a DV / teiid > installation. So the runtime would only be recognized as an "EAP-Based > Product" by the code in ASTools, and it won't be given the most > optimal name... basically the same situation JPP was in before we > added custom server beans for them. It's a small issue in some ways, > but, it's better if all our APIs (including server bean loader) > ensure the most accurate results possible, and if it's possible for > them to identify a DV / Teiid Runtime installation, it's better to do > it than to not do it. Ah, I forgot about the naming aspect. Sure this does make sense and definitely something that is better of in Teiid IMO. /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 07:45:53 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:45:53 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 code freeze this Thursday 16th April Message-ID: <6C338E88-3EE8-488D-A1F4-C53C3C70AEAE@redhat.com> Heya, Just a friendly reminder that Alpha2 code freeze is coming up on this Thursday the 16th [1] if you are on Red Hat VPN you can access the ical for it at [2]. Planned release of this is for 27th April. This Alpha2 is "Special" in the sense it is targeting Eclipse Mars M6 which includes a lot of updates and fixes to the platform including: * OS X p2 layout has changed = OS X users cannot update from Mars M1-M5 to M6, need to install. * Jetty 8 to Jetty 9 (major api change) * egit 3.x to 4.0 * GTK3 bug fixes (Snjezana Go Go!) * ...and probably a lot more ;) Big things hoping to show up in Alpha2 if you are not aware are: * easyimport * OpenShift v3 tooling (it did not make it to Alpha1) * First working and pretty version of Central on HTML5 * [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel [2] https://pp.engineering.redhat.com/pp-admin/api/v1/releases/524/schedule-tasks/?format=ics&flags__name=roadmap Good luck and don't be afraid to ask if you find issues in M6. There are still time to fix it upstream! :) p.s. I'm not available this Friday - but Fred Bricon promised to fill in for me if any questions/concerns around code freeze and readiness. Thanks, /max http://about.me/maxandersen From fbricon at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:01:52 2015 From: fbricon at redhat.com (Fred Bricon) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:01:52 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 code freeze this Thursday 16th April In-Reply-To: <6C338E88-3EE8-488D-A1F4-C53C3C70AEAE@redhat.com> References: <6C338E88-3EE8-488D-A1F4-C53C3C70AEAE@redhat.com> Message-ID: Sorry to disappoint but new Central on HTML5 won?t be part of Alpha2. It?s planned for Beta 1 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18813 ) > Le 14 avr. 2015 ? 07:45, Max Rydahl Andersen a ?crit : > > Heya, > > Just a friendly reminder that Alpha2 code freeze is coming up on this > Thursday the 16th [1] > if you are on Red Hat VPN you can access the ical for it at [2]. Planned > release of this is for 27th April. > > This Alpha2 is "Special" in the sense it is targeting Eclipse Mars M6 > which includes a lot of updates and fixes > to the platform including: > > * OS X p2 layout has changed = OS X users cannot update from Mars M1-M5 > to M6, need to install. > * Jetty 8 to Jetty 9 (major api change) > * egit 3.x to 4.0 > * GTK3 bug fixes (Snjezana Go Go!) > * ...and probably a lot more ;) > > Big things hoping to show up in Alpha2 if you are not aware are: > > * easyimport > * OpenShift v3 tooling (it did not make it to Alpha1) > * First working and pretty version of Central on HTML5 > * > > [1] > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel > [2] > https://pp.engineering.redhat.com/pp-admin/api/v1/releases/524/schedule-tasks/?format=ics&flags__name=roadmap > > Good luck and don't be afraid to ask if you find issues in M6. > There are still time to fix it upstream! :) > > p.s. I'm not available this Friday - but Fred Bricon promised to fill in > for me if any questions/concerns > around code freeze and readiness. > > Thanks, > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150414/563a7eea/attachment.html From blafond at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:36:00 2015 From: blafond at redhat.com (Barry Lafond) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:36:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Rob, Paul gave you the rundown on Teiid Designer's discovery of Teiid runtime versions after server start-up and that we contribute providers & actions to the Server View. Designer is designed to be backwards compatible (7.7 > 9.x) in terms of working with Teiid runtime admin and jdbc API. So in a sense, Designer doesn't care what Teiid runtime is installed. If it makes it easier on the user for server-set-up if JBT discovers/downloads/installs Teiid runtimes I'm in favor of it. Teiid Teiid Designer 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.2 - 8.4 8.4 8.5 - 8.6 8.7 9.0 8.8 9.1 8.9 (planned) 9.2 8.11 (planned) I've cc'd Ramesh Reddy on the Teiid project team and Van Halber, the DV build guy. They would know the version mappings between AS and Teiid runtimes. You are correct that Teiid 7.x was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. Note also that Teiid 8.x community releases were compatible with EAP 6.x Alpha releases, not Final. Those are reserved for DV/Product releases. So my understanding is that the server configurations are fairly different between project and product. Barry ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" > To: "Rob Stryker" > Cc: "phantomjinx" , "jbosstools-dev > jbosstools-dev" , "Barry Lafond" > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:45:48 AM > Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and > where downloadRuntime support belongs > I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime > detection if it detects it at runtime ? > /max > > After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for the > > detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. > > > > Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in > > *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid > > installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for > > their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime > > detection at all. > > > > TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but rather > > just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, they > > can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also > > provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the > > IServerWorkingCopy. > > > > *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying > > installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map of > > Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP versions > > they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was based > > on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important to > > get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss > > version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean > > Loaders / Runtime detection. > > > > One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the Teiid > > runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer > > system in JBoss 7. It has the expected > > org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the > > expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... > > > > But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put > > everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of > > identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd > > need to introspect > > teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar > > and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far > > seems accurate. > > > > With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get > > that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + > > downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some > > issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom > > stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly pull > > from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. > > > > - Rob Stryker > > > > - Rob Stryker > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150414/03ea1128/attachment-0001.html From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:25:48 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:25:48 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 code freeze this Thursday 16th April In-Reply-To: References: <6C338E88-3EE8-488D-A1F4-C53C3C70AEAE@redhat.com> Message-ID: <6DC680DC-C31F-4A07-9F68-2B609CF3A718@redhat.com> On 14 Apr 2015, at 17:01, Fred Bricon wrote: > Sorry to disappoint but new Central on HTML5 won?t be part of > Alpha2. It?s planned for Beta 1 > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18813 > ) bummer. thought you said last week it would make it in. Did I hear wrong or did something change ? /max > >> Le 14 avr. 2015 ? 07:45, Max Rydahl Andersen a >> ?crit : >> >> Heya, >> >> Just a friendly reminder that Alpha2 code freeze is coming up on this >> Thursday the 16th [1] >> if you are on Red Hat VPN you can access the ical for it at [2]. >> Planned >> release of this is for 27th April. >> >> This Alpha2 is "Special" in the sense it is targeting Eclipse Mars M6 >> which includes a lot of updates and fixes >> to the platform including: >> >> * OS X p2 layout has changed = OS X users cannot update from Mars >> M1-M5 >> to M6, need to install. >> * Jetty 8 to Jetty 9 (major api change) >> * egit 3.x to 4.0 >> * GTK3 bug fixes (Snjezana Go Go!) >> * ...and probably a lot more ;) >> >> Big things hoping to show up in Alpha2 if you are not aware are: >> >> * easyimport >> * OpenShift v3 tooling (it did not make it to Alpha1) >> * First working and pretty version of Central on HTML5 >> * >> >> [1] >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel >> [2] >> https://pp.engineering.redhat.com/pp-admin/api/v1/releases/524/schedule-tasks/?format=ics&flags__name=roadmap >> >> Good luck and don't be afraid to ask if you find issues in M6. >> There are still time to fix it upstream! :) >> >> p.s. I'm not available this Friday - but Fred Bricon promised to fill >> in >> for me if any questions/concerns >> around code freeze and readiness. >> >> Thanks, >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From fbricon at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:36:36 2015 From: fbricon at redhat.com (Fred Bricon) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:36:36 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 code freeze this Thursday 16th April In-Reply-To: <6DC680DC-C31F-4A07-9F68-2B609CF3A718@redhat.com> References: <6C338E88-3EE8-488D-A1F4-C53C3C70AEAE@redhat.com> <6DC680DC-C31F-4A07-9F68-2B609CF3A718@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9021963F-CA8E-4E1B-B0C0-8DFC87D88FC0@redhat.com> you heard wrong :-) > Le 14 avr. 2015 ? 15:25, Max Rydahl Andersen a ?crit : > > On 14 Apr 2015, at 17:01, Fred Bricon wrote: > >> Sorry to disappoint but new Central on HTML5 won?t be part of Alpha2. It?s planned for Beta 1 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18813 ) > > bummer. thought you said last week it would make it in. Did I hear wrong or did something change ? > > /max > >> >>> Le 14 avr. 2015 ? 07:45, Max Rydahl Andersen a ?crit : >>> >>> Heya, >>> >>> Just a friendly reminder that Alpha2 code freeze is coming up on this >>> Thursday the 16th [1] >>> if you are on Red Hat VPN you can access the ical for it at [2]. Planned >>> release of this is for 27th April. >>> >>> This Alpha2 is "Special" in the sense it is targeting Eclipse Mars M6 >>> which includes a lot of updates and fixes >>> to the platform including: >>> >>> * OS X p2 layout has changed = OS X users cannot update from Mars M1-M5 >>> to M6, need to install. >>> * Jetty 8 to Jetty 9 (major api change) >>> * egit 3.x to 4.0 >>> * GTK3 bug fixes (Snjezana Go Go!) >>> * ...and probably a lot more ;) >>> >>> Big things hoping to show up in Alpha2 if you are not aware are: >>> >>> * easyimport >>> * OpenShift v3 tooling (it did not make it to Alpha1) >>> * First working and pretty version of Central on HTML5 >>> * >>> >>> [1] >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel >>> [2] >>> https://pp.engineering.redhat.com/pp-admin/api/v1/releases/524/schedule-tasks/?format=ics&flags__name=roadmap >>> >>> Good luck and don't be afraid to ask if you find issues in M6. >>> There are still time to fix it upstream! :) >>> >>> p.s. I'm not available this Friday - but Fred Bricon promised to fill in >>> for me if any questions/concerns >>> around code freeze and readiness. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen From rareddy at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 23:20:17 2015 From: rareddy at redhat.com (Ramesh Reddy) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 23:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <2026117116.22143320.1429068017757.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> The usecase you are going after is download the Teiid runtime based on the Designer? Or you want to download the Teiid runtime based on the EAP? If it is former, Designer has strong preferences as to which Teiid runtime it works with, but in a given major release it work more seamless. If it is later EAP 5.1 is used with Teiid 7.x EAP 6.1 Alpha, up to Teiid 8.8 EAP 6.3 Alpha, Teiid 8.9, 8.10 We are planning for EAP 6.4.Alpha for Teiid 8.11 No WildFly support yet. If you think a marker file like in the MANIFEST.MF makes it easier, we are open to add such file. Ramesh.. ----- Original Message ----- > Rob, > Paul gave you the rundown on Teiid Designer's discovery of Teiid runtime > versions after server start-up and that we contribute providers & actions to > the Server View. Designer is designed to be backwards compatible (7.7 > 9.x) > in terms of working with Teiid runtime admin and jdbc API. So in a sense, > Designer doesn't care what Teiid runtime is installed. If it makes it easier > on the user for server-set-up if JBT discovers/downloads/installs Teiid > runtimes I'm in favor of it. > Teiid Teiid > Designer > 7.7 7.7 > 8.0 8.2 > 8.1 8.3 > 8.2 - 8.4 8.4 > 8.5 - 8.6 8.7 > 9.0 8.8 > 9.1 8.9 (planned) > 9.2 8.11 (planned) > I've cc'd Ramesh Reddy on the Teiid project team and Van Halber, the DV build > guy. They would know the version mappings between AS and Teiid runtimes. > You are correct that Teiid 7.x was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is > for AS7. Note also that Teiid 8.x community releases were compatible with > EAP 6.x Alpha releases, not Final. Those are reserved for DV/Product > releases. > So my understanding is that the server configurations are fairly different > between project and product. > Barry > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" > > > To: "Rob Stryker" > > > Cc: "phantomjinx" , "jbosstools-dev > > jbosstools-dev" , "Barry Lafond" > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:45:48 AM > > > Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and > > where downloadRuntime support belongs > > > I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime > > > detection if it detects it at runtime ? > > > /max > > > > After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for the > > > > detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. > > > > > > > > Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in > > > > *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid > > > > installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for > > > > their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime > > > > detection at all. > > > > > > > > TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but rather > > > > just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, they > > > > can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also > > > > provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the > > > > IServerWorkingCopy. > > > > > > > > *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying > > > > installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map of > > > > Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP versions > > > > they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was based > > > > on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important to > > > > get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss > > > > version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean > > > > Loaders / Runtime detection. > > > > > > > > One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the Teiid > > > > runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer > > > > system in JBoss 7. It has the expected > > > > org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the > > > > expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... > > > > > > > > But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put > > > > everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of > > > > identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd > > > > need to introspect > > > > teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar > > > > and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far > > > > seems accurate. > > > > > > > > With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get > > > > that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + > > > > downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some > > > > issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom > > > > stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly pull > > > > from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. > > > > > > > > - Rob Stryker > > > > > > > > - Rob Stryker > > > /max > > > http://about.me/maxandersen > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150414/d7460c88/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 03:01:45 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 03:01:45 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 1 issue with no component Message-ID: <201504150701.t3F71jpk016511@int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19590 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19590 Summary: Update module's README.md files with information about dependencies to other modules Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 5:37:10.162678 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:11:34 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:11:34 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <2026117116.22143320.1429068017757.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <55278AD2.2000101@phantomjinx.co.uk> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <2026117116.22143320.1429068017757.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 15 Apr 2015, at 5:20, Ramesh Reddy wrote: > The usecase you are going after is download the Teiid runtime based on > the Designer? Or you want to download the Teiid runtime based on the > EAP? If it is former, Designer has strong preferences as to which > Teiid runtime it works with, but in a given major release it work more > seamless. If it is later > EAP 5.1 is used with Teiid 7.x > EAP 6.1 Alpha, up to Teiid 8.8 > EAP 6.3 Alpha, Teiid 8.9, 8.10 eh - I thought you guys supported multiple runtimes by now ? btw. this is not for matching teiid runtimes with designer - it is about when JBoss Tools runtime detection or server wizard detects a server we would like to know if it is more than just the generic EAP server - we already check if it is portal or SOA-P or FSW and then name the server adaptor appropriately. By adding Teeid support to we would get "JBoss Data Virtualisation 7.4" instead of "JBoss EAP 5.1". That is all - very simple actually ;) > We are planning for > > EAP 6.4.Alpha for Teiid 8.11 > > No WildFly support yet. If you think a marker file like in the > MANIFEST.MF makes it easier, we are open to add such file. > > Ramesh.. > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Rob, > >> Paul gave you the rundown on Teiid Designer's discovery of Teiid >> runtime >> versions after server start-up and that we contribute providers & >> actions to >> the Server View. Designer is designed to be backwards compatible (7.7 >> > 9.x) >> in terms of working with Teiid runtime admin and jdbc API. So in a >> sense, >> Designer doesn't care what Teiid runtime is installed. If it makes it >> easier >> on the user for server-set-up if JBT discovers/downloads/installs >> Teiid >> runtimes I'm in favor of it. > >> Teiid Teiid >> Designer >> 7.7 7.7 >> 8.0 8.2 >> 8.1 8.3 >> 8.2 - 8.4 8.4 >> 8.5 - 8.6 8.7 >> 9.0 8.8 >> 9.1 8.9 (planned) >> 9.2 8.11 (planned) > >> I've cc'd Ramesh Reddy on the Teiid project team and Van Halber, the >> DV build >> guy. They would know the version mappings between AS and Teiid >> runtimes. > >> You are correct that Teiid 7.x was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x >> stream is >> for AS7. Note also that Teiid 8.x community releases were compatible >> with >> EAP 6.x Alpha releases, not Final. Those are reserved for DV/Product >> releases. > >> So my understanding is that the server configurations are fairly >> different >> between project and product. > >> Barry > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" >> >>> To: "Rob Stryker" >> >>> Cc: "phantomjinx" , >>> "jbosstools-dev >>> jbosstools-dev" , "Barry Lafond" >>> >> >>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:45:48 AM >> >>> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization >>> runtimes and >>> where downloadRuntime support belongs >> > >>> I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime >> >>> detection if it detects it at runtime ? >> > >>> /max >> > >>>> After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for >>>> the >> >>>> detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. >> >>>> >> >>>> Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in >> >>>> *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid >> >>>> installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for >> >>>> their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime >> >>>> detection at all. >> >>>> >> >>>> TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but >>>> rather >> >>>> just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, >>>> they >> >>>> can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also >> >>>> provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the >> >>>> IServerWorkingCopy. >> >>>> >> >>>> *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying >> >>>> installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map >>>> of >> >>>> Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP >>>> versions >> >>>> they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was >>>> based >> >>>> on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important >>>> to >> >>>> get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss >> >>>> version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean >> >>>> Loaders / Runtime detection. >> >>>> >> >>>> One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the >>>> Teiid >> >>>> runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer >> >>>> system in JBoss 7. It has the expected >> >>>> org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the >> >>>> expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... >> >>>> >> >>>> But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put >> >>>> everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of >> >>>> identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd >> >>>> need to introspect >> >>>> teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar >> >>>> and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far >> >>>> seems accurate. >> >>>> >> >>>> With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get >> >>>> that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + >> >>>> downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some >> >>>> issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom >> >>>> stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly >>>> pull >> >>>> from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. >> >>>> >> >>>> - Rob Stryker >> >>>> >> >>>> - Rob Stryker >> > >>> /max >> >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >> /max http://about.me/maxandersen From rareddy at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 09:10:36 2015 From: rareddy at redhat.com (Ramesh Reddy) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <2026117116.22143320.1429068017757.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1371958984.223791.1429103436262.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > On 15 Apr 2015, at 5:20, Ramesh Reddy wrote: > > > The usecase you are going after is download the Teiid runtime based on > > the Designer? Or you want to download the Teiid runtime based on the > > EAP? If it is former, Designer has strong preferences as to which > > Teiid runtime it works with, but in a given major release it work more > > seamless. If it is later > > > EAP 5.1 is used with Teiid 7.x > > EAP 6.1 Alpha, up to Teiid 8.8 > > EAP 6.3 Alpha, Teiid 8.9, 8.10 > > eh - I thought you guys supported multiple runtimes by now ? The issue there is we depend heavily on service, deployment and management APIs of the AS, not to mention all the common dependencies to other libraries. We have to change based on them thus we can not release a single Teiid runtime across all the EAP instances. > > btw. this is not for matching teiid runtimes with designer - it is about > when JBoss Tools runtime detection or server wizard detects a server we > would like to know > if it is more than just the generic EAP server - we already check if it > is portal or SOA-P or FSW > and then name the server adaptor appropriately. > > By adding Teeid support to we would get "JBoss Data Virtualisation 7.4" > instead of "JBoss EAP 5.1". MANIFEST.MF is the discovery mechanism with SOA-P or FSW? As I said we can adopt to that mechanism if that is what we want. > > That is all - very simple actually ;) > > > We are planning for > > > > EAP 6.4.Alpha for Teiid 8.11 > > > > No WildFly support yet. If you think a marker file like in the > > MANIFEST.MF makes it easier, we are open to add such file. > > > > > Ramesh.. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> Rob, > > > >> Paul gave you the rundown on Teiid Designer's discovery of Teiid > >> runtime > >> versions after server start-up and that we contribute providers & > >> actions to > >> the Server View. Designer is designed to be backwards compatible (7.7 > >> > 9.x) > >> in terms of working with Teiid runtime admin and jdbc API. So in a > >> sense, > >> Designer doesn't care what Teiid runtime is installed. If it makes it > >> easier > >> on the user for server-set-up if JBT discovers/downloads/installs > >> Teiid > >> runtimes I'm in favor of it. > > > >> Teiid Teiid > >> Designer > >> 7.7 7.7 > >> 8.0 8.2 > >> 8.1 8.3 > >> 8.2 - 8.4 8.4 > >> 8.5 - 8.6 8.7 > >> 9.0 8.8 > >> 9.1 8.9 (planned) > >> 9.2 8.11 (planned) > > > >> I've cc'd Ramesh Reddy on the Teiid project team and Van Halber, the > >> DV build > >> guy. They would know the version mappings between AS and Teiid > >> runtimes. > > > >> You are correct that Teiid 7.x was based on JBoss 5, while the 8.x > >> stream is > >> for AS7. Note also that Teiid 8.x community releases were compatible > >> with > >> EAP 6.x Alpha releases, not Final. Those are reserved for DV/Product > >> releases. > > > >> So my understanding is that the server configurations are fairly > >> different > >> between project and product. > > > >> Barry > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" > >> > >>> To: "Rob Stryker" > >> > >>> Cc: "phantomjinx" , > >>> "jbosstools-dev > >>> jbosstools-dev" , "Barry Lafond" > >>> > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:45:48 AM > >> > >>> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization > >>> runtimes and > >>> where downloadRuntime support belongs > >> > > > >>> I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime > >> > >>> detection if it detects it at runtime ? > >> > > > >>> /max > >> > > > >>>> After some discussion with PGR, we think it makes more sense for > >>>> the > >> > >>>> detection to live in the Teiid Designer repository. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> Teiid Designer currently only has code for detecting teiid in > >> > >>>> *running* servers, with no support for identifying a Teiid > >> > >>>> installation in servers that aren't running. This makes sense for > >> > >>>> their use case (server may be remote) but is not useful for runtime > >> > >>>> detection at all. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> TD currently is not involved in the server creation at all, but > >>>> rather > >> > >>>> just adds listeners so that once a server is added, or started, > >>>> they > >> > >>>> can begin their configuration / build up their model. They also > >> > >>>> provide editor extensions that allow setting fields on the > >> > >>>> IServerWorkingCopy. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> *Barry*: One thing that would help tremendously with identifying > >> > >>>> installations in non-running local servers is if I could have a map > >>>> of > >> > >>>> Teiid / DV releases and what underlying JBoss / Wildfly / EAP > >>>> versions > >> > >>>> they correspond to. What I've heard so far is that Teiid 7.x was > >>>> based > >> > >>>> on JBoss 5, while the 8.x stream is for AS7. It's pretty important > >>>> to > >> > >>>> get a full mapping of supported releases to their underlying JBoss > >> > >>>> version, though. This way I can properly implement the Server Bean > >> > >>>> Loaders / Runtime detection. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> One final thing to note, which I think we should bring up to the > >>>> Teiid > >> > >>>> runtime team directly, is that DV product properly uses the layer > >> > >>>> system in JBoss 7. It has the expected > >> > >>>> org/jboss/as/product/dv/dir/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, with the > >> > >>>> expected attribute JBoss-Product-Release-Version: 6.1.0... > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> But the community releases of Teiid *do not*. They simply put > >> > >>>> everything in modules/system/layers/base, with no clear way of > >> > >>>> identifying a version. If I wanted to look at the version here, I'd > >> > >>>> need to introspect > >> > >>>> teiid-8.10.0.Final/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/teiid/api/main/teiid-api-8.10.0.Final.jar > >> > >>>> and look at it's manifest.mf for the Bundle-Version, which so far > >> > >>>> seems accurate. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> With all this in mind, it should be relatively painless (once I get > >> > >>>> that version mapping from Barry) to get runtime detection + > >> > >>>> downloading supported for Teiid Runtime / DV. There may be some > >> > >>>> issues in stacks.yaml (since I'm not too familiar with all the bom > >> > >>>> stuff) but I expect the version mapping will help me to properly > >>>> pull > >> > >>>> from other parts of stacks.yaml without issue. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> - Rob Stryker > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> - Rob Stryker > >> > > > >>> /max > >> > >>> http://about.me/maxandersen > >> > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:33:34 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:33:34 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Question on data virtualization runtimes and where downloadRuntime support belongs In-Reply-To: <1371958984.223791.1429103436262.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <552737D8.8000708@redhat.com> <5527FFE8.9050306@redhat.com> <552820EF.5060502@redhat.com> <6A98A8DB-3CB5-4079-926B-9C03AF3342ED@redhat.com> <1268310755.15720101.1429036560657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <2026117116.22143320.1429068017757.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1371958984.223791.1429103436262.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 15 Apr 2015, at 15:10, Ramesh Reddy wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 15 Apr 2015, at 5:20, Ramesh Reddy wrote: >> >>> The usecase you are going after is download the Teiid runtime based >>> on >>> the Designer? Or you want to download the Teiid runtime based on the >>> EAP? If it is former, Designer has strong preferences as to which >>> Teiid runtime it works with, but in a given major release it work >>> more >>> seamless. If it is later >> >>> EAP 5.1 is used with Teiid 7.x >>> EAP 6.1 Alpha, up to Teiid 8.8 >>> EAP 6.3 Alpha, Teiid 8.9, 8.10 >> >> eh - I thought you guys supported multiple runtimes by now ? > > The issue there is we depend heavily on service, deployment and > management APIs of the AS, not to mention all the common dependencies > to other libraries. We have to change based on them thus we can not > release a single Teiid runtime across all the EAP instances. I'm not talking about Teiid runtime supporting multiple EAP. I'm talking Teiid Designer supporting multiple versions of Teiid runtime. >> btw. this is not for matching teiid runtimes with designer - it is >> about >> when JBoss Tools runtime detection or server wizard detects a server >> we >> would like to know >> if it is more than just the generic EAP server - we already check if >> it >> is portal or SOA-P or FSW >> and then name the server adaptor appropriately. >> >> By adding Teeid support to we would get "JBoss Data Virtualisation >> 7.4" >> instead of "JBoss EAP 5.1". > > MANIFEST.MF is the discovery mechanism with SOA-P or FSW? As I said we > can adopt to that mechanism if that is what we want. we use the jboss product layering metadata. Rob can outline the details. Note, in case you don't actually use that it would be interesting to know why. i.e. is it A) we didn't know about it - lets use it! or B) Teiid is not considered a layered product and can be installed/patched in a different way than SOA-P, FSW,etc. thus it is not registered as a layered product. /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:56:12 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:56:12 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Should there be 2 versions of javax.servlet in JBDS? Message-ID: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> Just wondering if anyone knows WHY we include javax.servlet 3.0.0 and 3.1.0 in JBDS. More importantly... SHOULD we be including both? Or can we just include 3.1.0 and drop 3.0.0? If we need both, then that's fine -- I'll add another exclusion rule to versionwatch [1]. But if we only need the newer one, that's even better. [1] https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-qa/blob/master/vwatch/src/main/resources/multiple-version-ignore.properties Looking into our 4.50.x target platforms [2], I see we explicitly add javax.servlet 3.0.0 but don't add 3.1.0. [2] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-target-platforms/blob/4.50.x/jbdevstudio/multiple/jbdevstudio-multiple.target#L32 Maybe we should remove the 3.0.0 version from the target platform for Alpha2, and see if anything breaks? 8-D -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From rstryker at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 20:45:17 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:45:17 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Creation of pom.xml property for skipTestOrITest for parent pom.xml Message-ID: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> My jboss/wf runtimes are being downloaded via my integration tests, even when -DskipTests is selected, because my integration test pom.xml has ${skipITests} in it. Until now, there was no easily recognized way to make a new property that could 'or' skipTests with skipITests. So I've added this to my pom in one of my topic branches, and it seems to work exactly how we'd want it to. It basically functions via a regex, puts ${skipTests}${skipITests}, and performs a regex replacement to make the value either "true" or blank. This property can later be used in my section. If anyone thinks this property should be available for parent pom, I'd suggest you take it and make it available to all other modules who might have integration tests with heavy dependencies. Otherwise, I'll just keep it in my local pom for my itests. org.codehaus.mojo build-helper-maven-plugin 1.7 regex-property regex-property skipTestOrITest ${skipTests}${skipITests} ((..skipTests.)?(true)?((..skipITests.)|(null)|(true)|(false))?) $3 false From rstryker at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 23:45:12 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:45:12 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Should there be 2 versions of javax.servlet in JBDS? In-Reply-To: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> References: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552F3048.9010408@redhat.com> A fresh download of Luna SR2 shows the following files with 'javax.servlet' in the name: [rob at localhost wildfly-web-9.0.0.Beta2.zip.expanded]$ tar -ztvf /tmp/eclipse-jee-luna-SR2-linux-gtk-x86_64.tar.gz | grep "javax.servlet" -rw-rw-r-- messagebus/users 107235 2015-02-19 03:30 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet.jsp_2.2.0.v201112011158.jar -rw-rw-r-- messagebus/users 201594 2015-02-19 03:30 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet_3.0.0.v201112011016.jar A fresh download of Mars shows the following files with "javax.servlet" in the name: [rob at localhost wildfly-web-9.0.0.Beta2.zip.expanded]$ tar -ztvf /tmp/eclipse-jee-mars-M6-linux-gtk-x86_64.tar.gz | grep "javax.servlet" -rw-rw-r-- genie.packaging/technology.packaging 105235 2015-03-26 08:15 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet_3.1.0.v201410161800.jar -rw-rw-r-- genie.packaging/technology.packaging 107235 2015-03-26 08:15 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet.jsp_2.2.0.v201112011158.jar My guess is that we had servlet 3.0 in the Luna TP and when we simply 'added' the mars deps, we added the new one. I would suggest that if Mars does not come with a javax.servlet_3.0 then we don't need it. I know my code specifically does not depend on it either, but I cannot guarantee others do not require specifics. I honestly can't imagine anyone on our team requiring servlet 3.0 jar specifically, but I have been known to suffer from a lack of imagination in the past. - Rob Stryker On 04/15/2015 05:56 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Just wondering if anyone knows WHY we include javax.servlet 3.0.0 and > 3.1.0 in JBDS. > > More importantly... SHOULD we be including both? Or can we just include > 3.1.0 and drop 3.0.0? > > If we need both, then that's fine -- I'll add another exclusion rule to > versionwatch [1]. But if we only need the newer one, that's even better. > > [1] > https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-qa/blob/master/vwatch/src/main/resources/multiple-version-ignore.properties > > Looking into our 4.50.x target platforms [2], I see we explicitly add > javax.servlet 3.0.0 but don't add 3.1.0. > > [2] > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-target-platforms/blob/4.50.x/jbdevstudio/multiple/jbdevstudio-multiple.target#L32 > > Maybe we should remove the 3.0.0 version from the target platform for > Alpha2, and see if anything breaks? 8-D > > From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 01:35:08 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:35:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Creation of pom.xml property for skipTestOrITest for parent pom.xml In-Reply-To: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> References: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> Message-ID: Got a PR to look at ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen > On 16 Apr 2015, at 02:45, Rob Stryker wrote: > > My jboss/wf runtimes are being downloaded via my integration tests, even > when -DskipTests is selected, because my integration test pom.xml has > ${skipITests} in it. Until now, there was no easily > recognized way to make a new property that could 'or' skipTests with > skipITests. > > So I've added this to my pom in one of my topic branches, and it seems > to work exactly how we'd want it to. It basically functions via a regex, > puts ${skipTests}${skipITests}, and performs a regex replacement to make > the value either "true" or blank. This property can later be used in my > section. > > If anyone thinks this property should be available for parent pom, I'd > suggest you take it and make it available to all other modules who might > have integration tests with heavy dependencies. > > Otherwise, I'll just keep it in my local pom for my itests. > > > org.codehaus.mojo > build-helper-maven-plugin > 1.7 > > > regex-property > > regex-property > > > skipTestOrITest > ${skipTests}${skipITests} > ((..skipTests.)?(true)?((..skipITests.)|(null)|(true)|(false))?) > $3 > false > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 02:31:42 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 02:31:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Should there be 2 versions of javax.servlet in JBDS? In-Reply-To: <552F3048.9010408@redhat.com> References: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> <552F3048.9010408@redhat.com> Message-ID: <21FCE0F7-E167-4DD5-A908-80AF8D017913@redhat.com> Looks like a missed update when going to Mars ? I would just move it up. It's probably used by jetty in eclipse. /max http://about.me/maxandersen > On 16 Apr 2015, at 05:45, Rob Stryker wrote: > > > A fresh download of Luna SR2 shows the following files with > 'javax.servlet' in the name: > > [rob at localhost wildfly-web-9.0.0.Beta2.zip.expanded]$ tar -ztvf > /tmp/eclipse-jee-luna-SR2-linux-gtk-x86_64.tar.gz | grep "javax.servlet" > -rw-rw-r-- messagebus/users 107235 2015-02-19 03:30 > eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet.jsp_2.2.0.v201112011158.jar > -rw-rw-r-- messagebus/users 201594 2015-02-19 03:30 > eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet_3.0.0.v201112011016.jar > > > A fresh download of Mars shows the following files with "javax.servlet" > in the name: > > [rob at localhost wildfly-web-9.0.0.Beta2.zip.expanded]$ tar -ztvf > /tmp/eclipse-jee-mars-M6-linux-gtk-x86_64.tar.gz | grep "javax.servlet" > -rw-rw-r-- genie.packaging/technology.packaging 105235 2015-03-26 > 08:15 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet_3.1.0.v201410161800.jar > -rw-rw-r-- genie.packaging/technology.packaging 107235 2015-03-26 > 08:15 eclipse/plugins/javax.servlet.jsp_2.2.0.v201112011158.jar > > My guess is that we had servlet 3.0 in the Luna TP and when we simply > 'added' the mars deps, we added the new one. I would suggest that if > Mars does not come with a javax.servlet_3.0 then we don't need it. > > I know my code specifically does not depend on it either, but I cannot > guarantee others do not require specifics. I honestly can't imagine > anyone on our team requiring servlet 3.0 jar specifically, but I have > been known to suffer from a lack of imagination in the past. > > - Rob Stryker > > >> On 04/15/2015 05:56 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Just wondering if anyone knows WHY we include javax.servlet 3.0.0 and >> 3.1.0 in JBDS. >> >> More importantly... SHOULD we be including both? Or can we just include >> 3.1.0 and drop 3.0.0? >> >> If we need both, then that's fine -- I'll add another exclusion rule to >> versionwatch [1]. But if we only need the newer one, that's even better. >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-qa/blob/master/vwatch/src/main/resources/multiple-version-ignore.properties >> >> Looking into our 4.50.x target platforms [2], I see we explicitly add >> javax.servlet 3.0.0 but don't add 3.1.0. >> >> [2] >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-target-platforms/blob/4.50.x/jbdevstudio/multiple/jbdevstudio-multiple.target#L32 >> >> Maybe we should remove the 3.0.0 version from the target platform for >> Alpha2, and see if anything breaks? 8-D > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:00:24 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:00:24 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 2 issues with no component Message-ID: <201504160700.t3G70Om4018953@int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19590 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19590 Summary: Update module's README.md files with information about dependencies to other modules Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 19:09:09.409845 ---------------------------- * No component for JBDS-3407 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3407 Summary: Not able to create 'non-bare' repository in JBDS 8.1. Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 22:47:00.413649 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From taozhi29480 at 163.com Thu Apr 16 03:57:16 2015 From: taozhi29480 at 163.com (Ashley Fletcher) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:57:16 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] your web site... Message-ID: <201504160757.t3G7vGXH007438@lists01.dmz-a.mwc.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Hi, My name is Tao Zhi and I'm an independent web strategist. I came across your business website while researching a client's site for toxic links; your website was linked to some of the same bad sites. I also noticed it was not fully compliant with Google's new Penguin 3.0 Algorithm and Panda rules. Whenever I find good companies with online issues I tend to reach out and let them know, In 20 minutes I can show you how you could fuel your brand and generate more revenue from search engines and social networks. These are tactics we've used to help over 300 clients grow their business and are currently "The fastest growing Internet marketing Company in China"! All I'd like to do is follow up about this with a quick phone call... Can I call you this week to discuss some proven strategies that can help your business grow? Looking forward to your positive response. Warm Regards, Tao Zhi Grow Business Rankings 62 Renmin Lu, Qingdao Shi Shandong, 266033 ????, ??????????????????????????????????????, ??????????????,??????????????????. ??????????10??????????????,?????? ??????????????????????????????. ???? taozhi29480 at 163.com From mistria at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:42:31 2015 From: mistria at redhat.com (Mickael Istria) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:42:31 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Should there be 2 versions of javax.servlet in JBDS? In-Reply-To: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> References: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552F75F7.8070906@redhat.com> On 04/15/2015 11:56 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Just wondering if anyone knows WHY we include javax.servlet 3.0.0 and > 3.1.0 in JBDS. > More importantly... SHOULD we be including both? Or can we just include > 3.1.0 and drop 3.0.0? I have JBDS installed from installer, which basically ran a p2 director. And I get jetty 3.0.0 and jetty 3.1.0. Than means that while resolving what to installed, p2 has to keep both versions of javax.servlet. That's definitely a sign that our dependency chain currently need both (or p2 wouldn't have installed both). So I've tried the ultimate test: $ cd jbdevstudio-9.0.0.Alpha2/studio $ rm plugins/javax.servlet_3.0.0* $ ./jbdevstudio And saw !ENTRY org.jboss.tools.ws.ui 4 0 2015-04-16 10:35:49.110 !MESSAGE FrameworkEvent ERROR !STACK 0 org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Could not resolve module: org.jboss.tools.ws.ui [967] Unresolved requirement: Import-Package: javax.servlet; version="[2.4.0,3.0.0)" at org.eclipse.osgi.container.Module.start(Module.java:434) at org.eclipse.osgi.container.ModuleContainer$ContainerStartLevel.incStartLevel(ModuleContainer.java:1582) at org.eclipse.osgi.container.ModuleContainer$ContainerStartLevel.incStartLevel(ModuleContainer.java:1561) at org.eclipse.osgi.container.ModuleContainer$ContainerStartLevel.doContainerStartLevel(ModuleContainer.java:1533) at org.eclipse.osgi.container.ModuleContainer$ContainerStartLevel.dispatchEvent(ModuleContainer.java:1476) at org.eclipse.osgi.container.ModuleContainer$ContainerStartLevel.dispatchEvent(ModuleContainer.java:1) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager.dispatchEvent(EventManager.java:230) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager$EventThread.run(EventManager.java:340) Fun thing is that the javax.servlet_3.0.0 actually exports packages in version 2.6.0, whereas javax.servlet_3.1.0 exports them in version 3.1.0. I've put that in a Jira https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19605 -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150416/06aff16d/attachment.html From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:33:07 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:33:07 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Creation of pom.xml property for skipTestOrITest for parent pom.xml In-Reply-To: References: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552FBA13.5090401@redhat.com> It's simply the code snippet below, but then you use ${skipTestOrITest} in your poms, instead of ${skipITest}. Simple, no? Related: gentlemen, start your "I don't like the variable name / case of the variable" engines. :D On 04/16/2015 01:35 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Got a PR to look at ? > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > >> On 16 Apr 2015, at 02:45, Rob Stryker wrote: >> >> My jboss/wf runtimes are being downloaded via my integration tests, even >> when -DskipTests is selected, because my integration test pom.xml has >> ${skipITests} in it. Until now, there was no easily >> recognized way to make a new property that could 'or' skipTests with >> skipITests. >> >> So I've added this to my pom in one of my topic branches, and it seems >> to work exactly how we'd want it to. It basically functions via a regex, >> puts ${skipTests}${skipITests}, and performs a regex replacement to make >> the value either "true" or blank. This property can later be used in my >> section. >> >> If anyone thinks this property should be available for parent pom, I'd >> suggest you take it and make it available to all other modules who might >> have integration tests with heavy dependencies. >> >> Otherwise, I'll just keep it in my local pom for my itests. >> >> >> org.codehaus.mojo >> build-helper-maven-plugin >> 1.7 >> >> >> regex-property >> >> regex-property >> >> >> skipTestOrITest >> ${skipTests}${skipITests} >> ((..skipTests.)?(true)?((..skipITests.)|(null)|(true)|(false))?) >> $3 >> false >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:32:05 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:32:05 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) Message-ID: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself for code freeze. If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, please let me know. JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From snjezana.peco at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 13:33:48 2015 From: snjezana.peco at redhat.com (Snjezana Peco) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:33:48 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <552FF27C.1040100@redhat.com> Done for arquillian and birt. Snjeza On 4/16/2015 6:32 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself for > code freeze. > > If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, please > let me know. > > JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 > Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 > JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 > VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 > Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 > Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 > Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 > Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 > OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 > JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 > JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 > Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 > Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 > BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 > Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 > Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 > Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 > LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 > > From mistria at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:46:27 2015 From: mistria at redhat.com (Mickael Istria) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:46:27 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Blocker bug in JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 Message-ID: <55300383.8080507@redhat.com> User cannot select which workspace to use, default one $HOME/workspace always used: see https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19627 -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150416/8d754db6/attachment.html From mistria at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 15:09:25 2015 From: mistria at redhat.com (Mickael Istria) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:09:25 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Target Platform 4.50.0.Alpha2 for JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 has been released. Message-ID: <553008E5.9050200@redhat.com> Target Platform 4.50.0.Alpha2 for JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 has been released. Changes (compared to 4.50.0.Alpha1) ======= * JBDS-3259: Mylyn wikitext * JBIDE-19497: Replaced Jetty 8 by Jetty 9.2.5 * JBIDE-19539: Mars M6 * JBIDE-19585: Jetty 9.2.9 * JBDS-3285: Easymport dependencies Usage ===== Target platform 4.50.0.Alpha2 is what JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 will use. All Jenkins jobs for branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x and parent pom 4.3.0.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT have been updated to use target platform 4.50.0.Alpha2. The following p2 repositories *will be modified* to point to this new target platform once JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 is released: * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/luna/ * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbdevstudiotarget/luna/ Until then, you can access the target platform at the URLs below. Download ======== Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2/REPO/ Update site zip: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2/jbosstoolstarget-4.50.0.Alpha2.zip Git tag: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-target-platforms/tree/4.50.0.Alpha2 Testing/Development =================== If your root pom correctly specifies the latest parent pom version as 4.3.0.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT, you need only this: $ mvn clean verify If you're using a different parent pom, use this: $ mvn clean verify -Dtpc.version=4.50.0.Alpha2 For advanced usage and help (using in IDE, building a mirror locally, using a zip), see https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-devdoc/blob/master/building/target_platforms/target_platforms_for_consumers.md What's next? ============ jbosstools-target-platforms project branch 4.50.x has been prepared for potential upgrades, and its version is now 4.50.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT. We can at least expect for Beta1: * Move to Mars M7 or some Mars RC * Update of tern.java * Shall you need anything else, please follow those instructions to request a change ASAP: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-devdoc/blob/master/building/target_platforms/target_platforms_updates.adoc All Jenkins jobs for *master* and parent pom 4.3.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT have been updated to use target platform 4.50.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT. -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150416/dbc380be/attachment-0001.html From akazakov at exadel.com Thu Apr 16 16:09:04 2015 From: akazakov at exadel.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:09:04 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> Done for base, jst, javaee. But I had to branch jst and javaee blindly because Aplha1 build is failing for them right now: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618?focusedCommentId=13059851&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13059851 There is something wrong that we can't build the code freeze branch (I need to test it locally before pushing to master) on the day of code freeze and have to wait until all components which you depend on are branched/built and published on our jenkins. On 04/16/2015 09:32 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself for > code freeze. > > If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, please > let me know. > > JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 > Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 > JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 > VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 > Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 > Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 > Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 > Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 > OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 > JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 > JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 > Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 > Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 > BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 > Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 > Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 > Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 > LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 > > From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 16:13:00 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:13:00 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> Message-ID: <553017CC.4060208@redhat.com> Open to suggestions for how to make the upstream components already built before they're branched. Do you want me to bootstrap with the previous milestone so you're building against Alpha1 bits instead of Alpha2 ones? Also wondering why, if your sources in master are building blue, you're worried they'll suddenly be red when all you've done is create a branch point. Surely if your master job is blue you can branch safely? N On 04/16/2015 04:09 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote: > Done for base, jst, javaee. > But I had to branch jst and javaee blindly because Aplha1 build is > failing for them right now: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618?focusedCommentId=13059851&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13059851 > > There is something wrong that we can't build the code freeze branch (I > need to test it locally before pushing to master) on the day of code > freeze and have to wait until all components which you depend on are > branched/built and published on our jenkins. > > > On 04/16/2015 09:32 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself for >> code freeze. >> >> If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, please >> let me know. >> >> JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 >> Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 >> JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 >> VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 >> Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 >> Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 >> Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 >> Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 >> OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 >> JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 >> JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 >> Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 >> Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 >> BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 >> Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 >> Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 >> Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 >> LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From pleacu at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 16:17:50 2015 From: pleacu at redhat.com (Paul Leacu) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBDSIS 8.0.1.GA/ JBTIS 4.2.1.Final now live In-Reply-To: <1292605141.10796511.1428499191314.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1038853389.1292615.1429215470551.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Greetings, The latest Eclipse-Luna capable, JBDS 8.1.0.GA compatible Integration Stack GA tooling is released. This release contains the productized BRMS/BPMS tooling featuring updated versions of the following components: * BPMN2 Modeler 1.1.2.Final_1.1.0.Final_luna * Drools/jBPM6 6.2.0.Final * ESB 1.5.530.Final * Fuse Tooling 7.3.0.Beta3 * SwitchYard 2.0.0.CR1 JBDSIS 8.0.1.GA, JBTIS 4.2.1.Final 1. If installing from Eclipse Luna: Help > Eclipse Marketplace... - in the 'Search' tab enter 'jbds' in the 'Find' input widget - select the 'Go' button - install 'Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio 8.1.0.GA' 2. Start jbdevstudio or eclipse (with jbds from step 1) 3. Select the Software/Update tab in the JBoss Central view. done! The standard p2 installer is available for JBDSIS (.GA): 1. If installing from Eclipse Luna: Help > Eclipse Marketplace... - in the 'Search' tab enter 'jbds' in the 'Find' input widget - select the 'Go' button - install 'Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio 8.1.0.GA' 2. Start jbdevstudio or eclipse-with-jbds from step 1, then: Help > Install New Software... Add... - use this for 'Location:' for the production integration stack: https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0/integration-stack/ - use this for 'Location:' for the early access integration stack: https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0/integration-stack/earlyaccess/ The standard p2 installer is available for JBTIS (.Final): * Start eclipse-with-jboss-tools, then: Help > Install New Software... Add... - use this for 'Location:' for the released-components integration stack: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/ - use this for 'Location:' for the early access integration stack: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/earlyaccess JBoss Central is supported for JBTIS (.Final): * Install JBoss Tools 4.2.3.Final: Help > Eclipse Marketplace... - in the 'Search' tab enter 'jboss tools' in the 'Find' input widget - select the 'Go' button - install 'JBoss Tools 4.2.3.Final' * Use JBoss Central - community bits are live ./eclipse Offline zip files are supported for both production and community installs: 1. https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0.0/jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-8.0.1.GA.zip https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0.0/jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-8.0.1.GA.zip.MD5 2. https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0.0/jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-8.0.1.GA-earlyaccess.zip https://devstudio.redhat.com/updates/8.0.0/jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-8.0.1.GA-earlyaccess.zip.MD5 3. http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/aggregate/jbosstools-integration-stack-aggregate-4.2.0.Final.zip http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/aggregate/jbosstools-integration-stack-aggregate-4.2.0.Final.zip.MD5 4. http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/aggregate/jbosstools-integration-stack-aggregate-4.2.1.Final-earlyaccess.zip http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/luna/integration-stack/aggregate/jbosstools-integration-stack-aggregate-4.2.1.Final-earlyaccess.zip.MD5 For component and QE test developers - the JBTIS target platforms are: - Full and candidate release target platforms including early access dependencies: https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/org/jboss/tools/integration-stack/target-platform/4.2.2.Final/ # note -ea target files http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbtistarget/4.2.2.Final/jbtis/REPO/ http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbtistarget/4.2.2.Final/jbtis/earlyaccess/REPO/ http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbtistarget/4.2.2.Final/jbdsis/REPO/ http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbtistarget/4.2.2.Final/jbdsis/earlyaccess/REPO/ Blog pending... Give it a try! --paull From akazakov at exadel.com Thu Apr 16 16:34:21 2015 From: akazakov at exadel.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:34:21 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <553017CC.4060208@redhat.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> <553017CC.4060208@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55301CCD.4090208@exadel.com> On 04/16/2015 01:13 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Open to suggestions for how to make the upstream components already > built before they're branched. Do you want me to bootstrap with the > previous milestone so you're building against Alpha1 bits instead of > Alpha2 ones? > > Also wondering why, if your sources in master are building blue, you're > worried they'll suddenly be red when all you've done is create a branch > point. Surely if your master job is blue you can branch safely? Then our Jira descriptions for code freezes are not correct since they tell component leads to verify the build is working/no test failures BEFORE brahcning: 3. Ensure you've built & run your plugin tests using the latest target platform version 4.50.0.Alpha2; mvn clean verify -Dtpc.version=4.50.0.Alpha2 from https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 Anyway, if I need to test any last minute changes or the new target platform, whatever. I cannot do it for the upcoming version which we are code freezing. I can do it for master only. And BTW I have never faced this problem before. Did we change anything? > N > > On 04/16/2015 04:09 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote: >> Done for base, jst, javaee. >> But I had to branch jst and javaee blindly because Aplha1 build is >> failing for them right now: >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618?focusedCommentId=13059851&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13059851 >> >> There is something wrong that we can't build the code freeze branch (I >> need to test it locally before pushing to master) on the day of code >> freeze and have to wait until all components which you depend on are >> branched/built and published on our jenkins. >> >> >> On 04/16/2015 09:32 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself for >>> code freeze. >>> >>> If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 >>> Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 >>> JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 >>> VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 >>> Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 >>> Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 >>> Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 >>> Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 >>> OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 >>> JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 >>> JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 >>> Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 >>> Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 >>> BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 >>> Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 >>> Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 >>> Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 >>> LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150416/21866b27/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 16:39:07 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:39:07 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Creation of pom.xml property for skipTestOrITest for parent pom.xml In-Reply-To: <552FBA13.5090401@redhat.com> References: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> <552FBA13.5090401@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 16 Apr 2015, at 15:33, Nick Boldt wrote: > It's simply the code snippet below, but then you use > ${skipTestOrITest} in your poms, instead of > ${skipITest}. if that is the case why even rename it. I'm just asking for a PR so there is no confusion. much easier than long email explanation and me trying to reproduce it and then not do it the same way he did. /max > > Simple, no? > > Related: gentlemen, start your "I don't like the variable name / case > of > the variable" engines. :D > > > On 04/16/2015 01:35 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> Got a PR to look at ? >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >>> On 16 Apr 2015, at 02:45, Rob Stryker wrote: >>> >>> My jboss/wf runtimes are being downloaded via my integration tests, >>> even >>> when -DskipTests is selected, because my integration test pom.xml >>> has >>> ${skipITests} in it. Until now, there was no easily >>> recognized way to make a new property that could 'or' skipTests with >>> skipITests. >>> >>> So I've added this to my pom in one of my topic branches, and it >>> seems >>> to work exactly how we'd want it to. It basically functions via a >>> regex, >>> puts ${skipTests}${skipITests}, and performs a regex replacement to >>> make >>> the value either "true" or blank. This property can later be used in >>> my >>> section. >>> >>> If anyone thinks this property should be available for parent pom, >>> I'd >>> suggest you take it and make it available to all other modules who >>> might >>> have integration tests with heavy dependencies. >>> >>> Otherwise, I'll just keep it in my local pom for my itests. >>> >>> >>> org.codehaus.mojo >>> build-helper-maven-plugin >>> 1.7 >>> >>> >>> regex-property >>> >>> regex-property >>> >>> >>> skipTestOrITest >>> ${skipTests}${skipITests} >>> ((..skipTests.)?(true)?((..skipITests.)|(null)|(true)|(false))?) >>> $3 >>> false >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 16:44:25 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:44:25 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <55301CCD.4090208@exadel.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> <553017CC.4060208@redhat.com> <55301CCD.4090208@exadel.com> Message-ID: <02A89935-E834-40AE-978F-C535DCF49B00@redhat.com> yeah - the refactoring of build structure makes it fail. we can't verify the build before branch. branched for web services since xcoulon is not awake now. > On 04/16/2015 01:13 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Open to suggestions for how to make the upstream components already >> built before they're branched. Do you want me to bootstrap with the >> previous milestone so you're building against Alpha1 bits instead of >> Alpha2 ones? >> >> Also wondering why, if your sources in master are building blue, >> you're >> worried they'll suddenly be red when all you've done is create a >> branch >> point. Surely if your master job is blue you can branch safely? > Then our Jira descriptions for code freezes are not correct since they > tell component leads to verify the build is working/no test failures > BEFORE brahcning: > 3. Ensure you've built & run your plugin tests using the latest target > platform version 4.50.0.Alpha2; > > mvn clean verify -Dtpc.version=4.50.0.Alpha2 > > from https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 > Anyway, if I need to test any last minute changes or the new target > platform, whatever. I cannot do it for the upcoming version which we > are code freezing. I can do it for master only. > > And BTW I have never faced this problem before. Did we change > anything? > > > >> N >> >> On 04/16/2015 04:09 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote: >>> Done for base, jst, javaee. >>> But I had to branch jst and javaee blindly because Aplha1 build is >>> failing for them right now: >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618?focusedCommentId=13059851&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13059851 >>> >>> There is something wrong that we can't build the code freeze branch >>> (I >>> need to test it locally before pushing to master) on the day of code >>> freeze and have to wait until all components which you depend on are >>> branched/built and published on our jenkins. >>> >>> >>> On 04/16/2015 09:32 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself >>>> for >>>> code freeze. >>>> >>>> If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, >>>> please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 >>>> Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 >>>> JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 >>>> VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 >>>> Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 >>>> Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 >>>> Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 >>>> Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 >>>> OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 >>>> JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 >>>> JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 >>>> Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 >>>> Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 >>>> BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 >>>> Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 >>>> Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 >>>> Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 >>>> LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 17:16:58 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:16:58 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Alpha2 Code Freeze is TODAY (April 16, 2015) In-Reply-To: <02A89935-E834-40AE-978F-C535DCF49B00@redhat.com> References: <552FE405.9010506@redhat.com> <553016E0.5040908@exadel.com> <553017CC.4060208@redhat.com> <55301CCD.4090208@exadel.com> <02A89935-E834-40AE-978F-C535DCF49B00@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553026CA.1030908@redhat.com> To work around build problems due to missing upstream bootstrapped builds, the Alpha2 parent pom now uses jbosstools_site_stream=master so you'll be able to resolve your upstream bits from their already-built master URLs, instead of failing to resolve their 4.3.mars counterparts (until they're built). (You can also do this via the commandline with mvn install -Djbosstools_site_stream=master or -Djbosstools_site_stream=4.3.mars ) One additional step I forgot to mention in the task jiras: * please bump your root poms in master branch to use parent pom 4.3.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT. So far, 5 of projects correctly deduced they should do this automatically, but the remaining ones still need a reminder. aerogear arquillian birt browsersim central forge freemarker hibernate openshift server vpe Cheers, On 04/16/2015 04:44 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > yeah - the refactoring of build structure makes it fail. > > we can't verify the build before branch. > > branched for web services since xcoulon is not awake now. > >> On 04/16/2015 01:13 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> Open to suggestions for how to make the upstream components already >>> built before they're branched. Do you want me to bootstrap with the >>> previous milestone so you're building against Alpha1 bits instead of >>> Alpha2 ones? >>> >>> Also wondering why, if your sources in master are building blue, >>> you're >>> worried they'll suddenly be red when all you've done is create a >>> branch >>> point. Surely if your master job is blue you can branch safely? >> Then our Jira descriptions for code freezes are not correct since they >> tell component leads to verify the build is working/no test failures >> BEFORE brahcning: >> 3. Ensure you've built & run your plugin tests using the latest target >> platform version 4.50.0.Alpha2; >> >> mvn clean verify -Dtpc.version=4.50.0.Alpha2 >> >> from https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 >> Anyway, if I need to test any last minute changes or the new target >> platform, whatever. I cannot do it for the upcoming version which we >> are code freezing. I can do it for master only. >> >> And BTW I have never faced this problem before. Did we change >> anything? >> >> >> >>> N >>> >>> On 04/16/2015 04:09 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote: >>>> Done for base, jst, javaee. >>>> But I had to branch jst and javaee blindly because Aplha1 build is >>>> failing for them right now: >>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618?focusedCommentId=13059851&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13059851 >>>> >>>> There is something wrong that we can't build the code freeze branch >>>> (I >>>> need to test it locally before pushing to master) on the day of code >>>> freeze and have to wait until all components which you depend on are >>>> branched/built and published on our jenkins. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/16/2015 09:32 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>>> Please perform the steps in these task jiras to prepare yourself >>>>> for >>>>> code freeze. >>>>> >>>>> If you need more time (eg., another day) before you can branch, >>>>> please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> JBoss Tools : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19608 >>>>> Aerogear : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19609 >>>>> JBT Update Sites : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19610 >>>>> VPE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19611 >>>>> Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19612 >>>>> Server : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19613 >>>>> Hibernate : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19614 >>>>> Base : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19615 >>>>> OpenShift : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19616 >>>>> JavaEE : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19617 >>>>> JST : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19618 >>>>> Forge : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19619 >>>>> Birt : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19620 >>>>> BrowserSim : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19621 >>>>> Webservices : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19622 >>>>> Arquillian : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19623 >>>>> Central : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19624 >>>>> LiveReload : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19625 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 03:00:39 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:00:39 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 3 issues with no component Message-ID: <201504170700.t3H70dqK028022@int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19590 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19590 Summary: Update module's README.md files with information about dependencies to other modules Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 1 day, 19:09:25.176659 ---------------------------- * No component for JBIDE-19627 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19627 Summary: JBoss Tools disables ability to select workspace Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 10:36:28.168051 ---------------------------- * No component for JBDS-3407 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3407 Summary: Not able to create 'non-bare' repository in JBDS 8.1. Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 1 day, 22:47:16.177053 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From manderse at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 05:14:38 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 05:14:38 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 3 issues with no component Message-ID: <201504170914.t3H9Ecu2012653@int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19590 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19590 Summary: Update module's README.md files with information about dependencies to other modules Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please ensure this issue has a proper component set. Last Update: 1 day, 21:23:24.124319 ---------------------------- * No component for JBIDE-19627 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19627 Summary: JBoss Tools disables ability to select workspace Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please ensure this issue has a proper component set. Last Update: 12:50:27.124023 ---------------------------- * No component for JBDS-3407 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3407 Summary: Not able to create 'non-bare' repository in JBDS 8.1. Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please ensure this issue has a proper component set. Last Update: 2 days, 1:01:15.124514 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=%28filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27%29 From rstryker at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:27:32 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:27:32 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Should there be 2 versions of javax.servlet in JBDS? In-Reply-To: <552F75F7.8070906@redhat.com> References: <552EDE7C.7040606@redhat.com> <552F75F7.8070906@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55312664.9020505@redhat.com> Couldn't org.jboss.tools.ws.ui just expand their version range now? On 04/16/2015 04:42 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: > org.jboss.tools.ws.ui -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150417/e935ae45/attachment.html From rstryker at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:34:17 2015 From: rstryker at redhat.com (Rob Stryker) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:34:17 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Creation of pom.xml property for skipTestOrITest for parent pom.xml In-Reply-To: References: <552F061D.1030208@redhat.com> <552FBA13.5090401@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553127F9.70603@redhat.com> I don't have a PR for putting it in parent pom. If you want to see it in action for me, then here it is: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-server/blob/master/as/itests/pom.xml#L53 On 04/16/2015 04:39 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On 16 Apr 2015, at 15:33, Nick Boldt wrote: > >> It's simply the code snippet below, but then you use >> ${skipTestOrITest} in your poms, instead of >> ${skipITest}. > if that is the case why even rename it. > > I'm just asking for a PR so there is no confusion. much easier than long > email explanation > and me trying to reproduce it and then not do it the same way he did. > > /max > >> Simple, no? >> >> Related: gentlemen, start your "I don't like the variable name / case >> of >> the variable" engines. :D >> >> >> On 04/16/2015 01:35 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> Got a PR to look at ? >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>>> On 16 Apr 2015, at 02:45, Rob Stryker wrote: >>>> >>>> My jboss/wf runtimes are being downloaded via my integration tests, >>>> even >>>> when -DskipTests is selected, because my integration test pom.xml >>>> has >>>> ${skipITests} in it. Until now, there was no easily >>>> recognized way to make a new property that could 'or' skipTests with >>>> skipITests. >>>> >>>> So I've added this to my pom in one of my topic branches, and it >>>> seems >>>> to work exactly how we'd want it to. It basically functions via a >>>> regex, >>>> puts ${skipTests}${skipITests}, and performs a regex replacement to >>>> make >>>> the value either "true" or blank. This property can later be used in >>>> my >>>> section. >>>> >>>> If anyone thinks this property should be available for parent pom, >>>> I'd >>>> suggest you take it and make it available to all other modules who >>>> might >>>> have integration tests with heavy dependencies. >>>> >>>> Otherwise, I'll just keep it in my local pom for my itests. >>>> >>>> >>>> org.codehaus.mojo >>>> build-helper-maven-plugin >>>> 1.7 >>>> >>>> >>>> regex-property >>>> >>>> regex-property >>>> >>>> >>>> skipTestOrITest >>>> ${skipTests}${skipITests} >>>> ((..skipTests.)?(true)?((..skipITests.)|(null)|(true)|(false))?) >>>> $3 >>>> false >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From pleacu at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:20:15 2015 From: pleacu at redhat.com (Paul Leacu) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] New Mars JBTIS target platform available - JBTIS-TP-4.3.0.Alpha1a In-Reply-To: <935189711.2208159.1429298160585.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <799464436.2209240.1429298415320.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Greetings - A new Eclipse Mars/ JBDS 9 compatible JBTIS TP is available - 4.3.0.Alpha1a https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/org/jboss/tools/integration-stack/target-platform/4.3.0.Alpha1a/ http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbtistarget/4.3.0.Alpha1a/ See Jira for details: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-425 Synopsis: 1. Update to Mars M6 http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/requirements/mars/201503291000-M6/ 3. Update JBoss Tools core TP to 4.50.0.Alpha2 3. Update JBoss Tools core update site to 4.3.0.Alpha1 http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/static/releases/jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1-updatesite-core/ http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/static/releases/jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1-updatesite-coretests 4. Update orbit requirements http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/requirements/orbit/S20150316021154/ Thanks, --paull From manderse at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 03:00:55 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 03:00:55 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 1 issue with no component Message-ID: <201504200700.t3K70tr4028780@int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBDS-3415 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3415 Summary: Fuse JMX Navigator is not showing any local processes on windows Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 0:38:04.212310 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From nboldt at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 01:54:06 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:54:06 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing Message-ID: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ Target platform: * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 New + noteworthy (subject to change): * https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ Schedule: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel -- Additional update sites: * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ Discovery sites: * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From bastian.ugimachi at gmail.com Mon Apr 20 07:44:58 2015 From: bastian.ugimachi at gmail.com (Bastian Ugimachi) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:44:58 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] antlr packages and lib not exported in Hibernate Tools 4.0.1 Message-ID: Dear all, I am currently working on an Eclipse-Plugin that is built on top of the Hibernate Tools project. For example, I am using the following statements to get the AST of a named query: try { HqlParser parser = HqlParser.getInstance(statementString); parser.statement(); } catch (RecognitionException | TokenStreamException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } AST statementAst = parser.getAST(); For this to work well with Hibernate Tools Version 4.0.0, I added bundle org.hibernate.eclipse.libs as required bundle to my plug-in configuration (which resolved to org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.0.Final-v20141016-1911-B82 so far). However, I now updated to Hiberate Tools 4.0.1 (org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95). The problem I have now is that the following imports cannot be resolved: import antlr.RecognitionException; import antlr.TokenStreamException; import antlr.collections.AST; The problem seems to arise from the fact, that in the new version's MANIFEST.MF, the antlr... packages are not exported and lib/hibernate/antlr-2.7.6.jar is not listed in the Bundle-ClassPath any more (I reformatted both MANIFEST.MFs, that you can find attached, to allow a convenient comparison). After manually adding the antlr-related entries to the new version's MANIFEST.MF, my code works pretty well again. My question is thus: (a) Do you consider this to be a bug in the realease of Hibernate Tools 4.0.1? (b) If yes for (a): Do you have an idea when this issue could be solved? (c) If no for (a): Which alternative solution would you suggest? I mean, manually editing the MANIFEST.MF of realeased plug-ins is not quite the best practice, is it? I tried to manally add antlr-2.7.6.jar as library to my project, which solved the compilation error, but yields a java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: antlr.LLkParser cannot be found by org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95 Any advice? Thanks! Bastian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150420/5801c890/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: B82_MANIFEST.MF Type: application/octet-stream Size: 16888 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150420/5801c890/attachment-0002.obj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: B95_MANIFEST.MF Type: application/octet-stream Size: 16511 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150420/5801c890/attachment-0003.obj From akazakov at exadel.com Mon Apr 20 14:01:34 2015 From: akazakov at exadel.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:01:34 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] antlr packages and lib not exported in Hibernate Tools 4.0.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55353EFE.6040702@exadel.com> First at all, please create an issue in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE to solve this problem in the next release. A pull request for https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-hibernate would be useful too :) On 04/20/2015 04:44 AM, Bastian Ugimachi wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am currently working on an Eclipse-Plugin that is built on top of > the Hibernate Tools project. For example, I am using the following > statements to get the AST of a named query: > > try { > HqlParser parser = HqlParser.getInstance(statementString); > parser.statement(); > } catch (RecognitionException | TokenStreamException e) { > e.printStackTrace(); > } > AST statementAst = parser.getAST(); > > For this to work well with Hibernate Tools Version 4.0.0, I added > bundle org.hibernate.eclipse.libs as required bundle to my plug-in > configuration (which resolved to > org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.0.Final-v20141016-1911-B82 so far). > > However, I now updated to Hiberate Tools 4.0.1 > (org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95). The > problem I have now is that the following imports cannot be resolved: > import antlr.RecognitionException; > import antlr.TokenStreamException; > import antlr.collections.AST; > > The problem seems to arise from the fact, that in the new version's > MANIFEST.MF, the antlr... packages are not exported and > lib/hibernate/antlr-2.7.6.jar is not listed in the Bundle-ClassPath > any more (I reformatted both MANIFEST.MFs, that you can find attached, > to allow a convenient comparison). After manually adding the > antlr-related entries to the new version's MANIFEST.MF, my code works > pretty well again. > > My question is thus: > (a) Do you consider this to be a bug in the realease of Hibernate > Tools 4.0.1? > (b) If yes for (a): Do you have an idea when this issue could be solved? > (c) If no for (a): Which alternative solution would you suggest? I > mean, manually editing the MANIFEST.MF of realeased plug-ins is not > quite the best practice, is it? I tried to manally add antlr-2.7.6.jar > as library to my project, which solved the compilation error, but > yields a java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: antlr.LLkParser cannot be > found by org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95 > > Any advice? > > Thanks! > Bastian > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150420/a90d0bf3/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 03:25:55 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:25:55 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] antlr packages and lib not exported in Hibernate Tools 4.0.1 In-Reply-To: <55353EFE.6040702@exadel.com> References: <55353EFE.6040702@exadel.com> Message-ID: On 20 Apr 2015, at 20:01, Alexey Kazakov wrote: > First at all, please create an issue in > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE to solve this problem in the > next release. > A pull request for https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-hibernate > would be useful too :) please note that we are really trying to limit exposing any of hibernate internal runtime API's to support multiple versions of Hibernate. Thus if this break that we won't be able to do it. What is your plugin trying to do that needs this level of access ? /max > > On 04/20/2015 04:44 AM, Bastian Ugimachi wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I am currently working on an Eclipse-Plugin that is built on top of >> the Hibernate Tools project. For example, I am using the following >> statements to get the AST of a named query: >> >> try { >> HqlParser parser = HqlParser.getInstance(statementString); >> parser.statement(); >> } catch (RecognitionException | TokenStreamException e) { >> e.printStackTrace(); >> } >> AST statementAst = parser.getAST(); >> >> For this to work well with Hibernate Tools Version 4.0.0, I added >> bundle org.hibernate.eclipse.libs as required bundle to my plug-in >> configuration (which resolved to >> org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.0.Final-v20141016-1911-B82 so far). >> >> However, I now updated to Hiberate Tools 4.0.1 >> (org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95). The >> problem I have now is that the following imports cannot be resolved: >> import antlr.RecognitionException; >> import antlr.TokenStreamException; >> import antlr.collections.AST; >> >> The problem seems to arise from the fact, that in the new version's >> MANIFEST.MF, the antlr... packages are not exported and >> lib/hibernate/antlr-2.7.6.jar is not listed in the Bundle-ClassPath >> any more (I reformatted both MANIFEST.MFs, that you can find >> attached, to allow a convenient comparison). After manually adding >> the antlr-related entries to the new version's MANIFEST.MF, my code >> works pretty well again. >> >> My question is thus: >> (a) Do you consider this to be a bug in the realease of Hibernate >> Tools 4.0.1? >> (b) If yes for (a): Do you have an idea when this issue could be >> solved? >> (c) If no for (a): Which alternative solution would you suggest? I >> mean, manually editing the MANIFEST.MF of realeased plug-ins is not >> quite the best practice, is it? I tried to manally add >> antlr-2.7.6.jar as library to my project, which solved the >> compilation error, but yields a java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> antlr.LLkParser cannot be found by >> org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95 >> >> Any advice? >> >> Thanks! >> Bastian >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:20:44 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:20:44 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> In case you were wondering where the browsersim standalone zip went, it has moved. You can get it here: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/browsersim-standalone/4.3.0.Alpha2/ (I've also updated the build process so that it publishes snapshots here: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-browsersim-standalone_master/ and http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/updates/browsersim-standalone/) On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: > As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & > community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. > > Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ > > Target platform: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 > > > New + noteworthy (subject to change): > * > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew > > * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ > > Schedule: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel > > > -- > > Additional update sites: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > > Discovery sites: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > > Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): > * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ > > > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 16:41:55 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:41:55 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9CF4E165-D28A-4B6F-A01E-4F1E52B983AE@redhat.com> I thought we used nexus for the nightly build of this ? Thats at least what http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Nightly.html#zips and http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Nightly.html#zips says ? /max > In case you were wondering where the browsersim standalone zip went, > it > has moved. > > You can get it here: > > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/browsersim-standalone/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > (I've also updated the build process so that it publishes snapshots > here: > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-browsersim-standalone_master/ > and > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/updates/browsersim-standalone/) > > On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & >> community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. >> >> Update site: >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ >> >> Target platform: >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 >> >> >> New + noteworthy (subject to change): >> * >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew >> >> * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ >> >> Schedule: >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel >> >> >> -- >> >> Additional update sites: >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> >> Discovery sites: >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> * >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> >> Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): >> * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ >> >> >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:00:31 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:00:31 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <9CF4E165-D28A-4B6F-A01E-4F1E52B983AE@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> <9CF4E165-D28A-4B6F-A01E-4F1E52B983AE@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5536BA6F.3080508@redhat.com> Yes, it's in Nexus too. Should I discontinue creating /builds/ and /updates/ for it then? On 04/21/2015 04:41 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > I thought we used nexus for the nightly build of this ? > > Thats at least what > http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Nightly.html#zips > and > http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Nightly.html#zips > says ? > > /max > >> In case you were wondering where the browsersim standalone zip went, it >> has moved. >> >> You can get it here: >> >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/browsersim-standalone/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >> >> >> (I've also updated the build process so that it publishes snapshots >> here: >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-browsersim-standalone_master/ >> >> and >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/updates/browsersim-standalone/) >> >> >> On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & >>> community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. >>> >>> Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ >>> >>> Target platform: >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 >>> >>> >>> >>> New + noteworthy (subject to change): >>> * >>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew >>> >>> >>> * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ >>> >>> Schedule: >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Additional update sites: >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Discovery sites: >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> * >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): >>> * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From nboldt at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:02:26 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:02:26 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <5536BA6F.3080508@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> <9CF4E165-D28A-4B6F-A01E-4F1E52B983AE@redhat.com> <5536BA6F.3080508@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5536BAE2.9020608@redhat.com> Actually, we only use Nexus for nightly. For specific snapshots, we pull zips and put them on Sourceforge. http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Alpha1.html#zips -> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/jbosstools4.3.0.x/jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1_2015-02-15_14-44-55-B13-browsersim-standalone.zip On 04/21/2015 05:00 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Yes, it's in Nexus too. > > Should I discontinue creating /builds/ and /updates/ for it then? > > On 04/21/2015 04:41 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> I thought we used nexus for the nightly build of this ? >> >> Thats at least what >> http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Nightly.html#zips >> and >> http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Nightly.html#zips >> says ? >> >> /max >> >>> In case you were wondering where the browsersim standalone zip went, it >>> has moved. >>> >>> You can get it here: >>> >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/browsersim-standalone/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>> >>> >>> >>> (I've also updated the build process so that it publishes snapshots >>> here: >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-browsersim-standalone_master/ >>> >>> >>> and >>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/updates/browsersim-standalone/) >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & >>>> community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. >>>> >>>> Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ >>>> >>>> Target platform: >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> New + noteworthy (subject to change): >>>> * >>>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ >>>> >>>> Schedule: >>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Additional update sites: >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Discovery sites: >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> * >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): >>>> * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >>> http://nick.divbyzero.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:23:44 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:23:44 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <5536BAE2.9020608@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> <553694FC.5010005@redhat.com> <9CF4E165-D28A-4B6F-A01E-4F1E52B983AE@redhat.com> <5536BA6F.3080508@redhat.com> <5536BAE2.9020608@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 21 Apr 2015, at 23:02, Nick Boldt wrote: > Actually, we only use Nexus for nightly. For specific snapshots, we > pull zips and put them on Sourceforge. > > http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Alpha1.html#zips > -> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/jbosstools4.3.0.x/jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1_2015-02-15_14-44-55-B13-browsersim-standalone.zip okey, could we try and stop calling releases/milestones for snapshots - they can't be both can they :) /max > > On 04/21/2015 05:00 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Yes, it's in Nexus too. >> >> Should I discontinue creating /builds/ and /updates/ for it then? >> >> On 04/21/2015 04:41 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> I thought we used nexus for the nightly build of this ? >>> >>> Thats at least what >>> http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Nightly.html#zips >>> and >>> http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Nightly.html#zips >>> says ? >>> >>> /max >>> >>>> In case you were wondering where the browsersim standalone zip >>>> went, it >>>> has moved. >>>> >>>> You can get it here: >>>> >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/browsersim-standalone/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> (I've also updated the build process so that it publishes snapshots >>>> here: >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-browsersim-standalone_master/ >>>> >>>> >>>> and >>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/updates/browsersim-standalone/) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>>> As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for >>>>> QE & >>>>> community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. >>>>> >>>>> Update site: >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ >>>>> >>>>> Target platform: >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> New + noteworthy (subject to change): >>>>> * >>>>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ >>>>> >>>>> Schedule: >>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Additional update sites: >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Discovery sites: >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): >>>>> * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com /max http://about.me/maxandersen From man8 at rtherdf.oowwwoo.com Tue Apr 21 22:21:54 2015 From: man8 at rtherdf.oowwwoo.com (PCB Prototype Fabrication/Printed circuit board Supply) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:21:54 +0000 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] =?gb2312?b?UENCIFByb3RvdHlwZSBGYWJyaWNhdGlvbi9Q?= =?gb2312?b?cmludGVkIGNpcmN1aXQgYm9hcmQgU3VwcGx50+vE+rmyz+3By8/g?= =?gb2312?b?suGhow==?= Message-ID: <001a1136232aa8189e051446d379@google.com> Dear Sir/Madam, Glad to know you from your great website, I'm proud to introduce you our high quality PCB products, Our advantage is - The most experienced PCB sample manufacture from CHINA Quick PCB Prototype Fabrication Fast shipment according to customer's requirement High quality with material Grade A FR-4 1 - 6 layer boards All free test Please kindly send us some drawings or manufacturing requirements description! We provide 10% discount for all our new customers, and for volume order please feel free to get back to us, we will assure you our best price. I would appreciate if you forward this letter to Technical Manager or to other expert responsible for technical integration of new products in your company, for we could discuss all the details of our future cooperation. Thanks for your attention to the above, we look forward to hearing back from you. Best regards, NiLu https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=109563458042155184300&target=ALBUM&id=6112185827377133649&authkey=Gv1sRgCPmO7aKd7OCsrgE&invite=CJmP_6oC&feat=email -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150422/01c95ea6/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: picasaweblogo-zh_CN.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1646 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150422/01c95ea6/attachment.gif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: email.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 9554 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150422/01c95ea6/attachment.jpg From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 03:00:58 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:00:58 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 1 issue with no component Message-ID: <201504220700.t3M70waj018753@int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19683 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19683 Summary: Create a user visible location for downloading tutorial metadata Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 10:32:33.731945 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 03:00:29 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (manderse at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:00:29 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 1 issue with no component Message-ID: <201504230700.t3N70Tbw000487@int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> This email is the result of a query to locate stalled/invalid jiras. Please fix them. Thanks! * No component for JBIDE-19688 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19688 Summary: Eclipse m2e, workspace resolution and Wildfly deployment issues Assignee: None set - please fix. Component: None set - please fix. Problem: No component - please assign this issue to one or more components. Last Update: 17:12:56.024403 ---------------------------- Query used: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%3D%27ds_lint_nocomponent%27 From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:36:36 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:36:36 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] New and noteworthy for Alpha2 - deadline friday Message-ID: Hey, alpha2 is set to go out Monday but we still don't have any N&N (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19662) Release Blog is set to go out Monday european time so to have that ready I need the N&N by friday. Please get them in ASAP or ping me with your ETA for it. /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:51:49 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:51:49 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools Core 4.3.0.Alpha2 bits available for QE testing In-Reply-To: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> References: <5534947E.7050603@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5538F8F5.4020100@redhat.com> In case you missed the discussion in IRC, I simply REPLACED B31 build run on the weekend with the B32 one on Monday evening, which included the fix for OpenShift / workspace bug JBIDE-19627. Apologies for the confusion. I erroneously assumed people would see the updated feature w/ timestamp of 20150420 (amidst everything else built on 20150417) and realize they were seeing the updated bits. You can also compare the two staged builds here: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2-build-core/ I would prefer going forward to NOT tag update sites with an "a" or "b" suffix when respins are needed. Instead, I would prefer that we simply drop a second (third) build into the /staging/builds/ folder, and REPLACE the contents of the /staging/updates/ folders with the latest & best bits. That way, the stuff in /staging/updates/ can simply be copied to /development/updates/ without having to remove an "a" or "b" suffix on the folder. -- As a reminder the plan is to get QE signoff late tomorrow, and queue up the bits on Sunday night (or Monday morning EST) so they can be released/blogged on Monday. Please bear with me as we roll out this new release process - if you have questions about where stuff is now located, or what's happening, don't stay silent. QUESTION EVERYTHING! See also JBDS-3208. Nick On 04/20/2015 01:54 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: > As always, these are not FINAL bits, but preliminary results for QE & > community testing. Not for use by customers or end users. > > Update site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/ > > Target platform: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.50.0.Alpha2 > > > New + noteworthy (subject to change): > * > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/tree/master/documentation/whatsnew > > * http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ > > Schedule: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel > > > -- > > Additional update sites: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/core/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/coretests/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/webtools/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > > Discovery sites: > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.central/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > * > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/updates/discovery.earlyaccess/4.3.0.Alpha2/ > > > Build folders (for build logs & update site zips): > * http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/staging/builds/ > > > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:48:44 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:48:44 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 24 unresolved issues with fixversion = Alpha2 Message-ID: <553968BC.8080504@redhat.com> Please resolve (if done) or punt to Beta1 (if not done) these 24 remaining Alpha2 issues: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%20%3D%20ds_freeze%20and%20filter%20%3D%20ds_unresolved Want a query for just *YOUR* issues (or unassigned issues)? Here ya go: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%20%3D%20ds_freeze%20and%20filter%20%3D%20ds_unresolved%20and%20%28assignee%20%3D%20currentUser%28%29%20or%20assignee%20%3D%20null%29 -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From akazakov at exadel.com Thu Apr 23 19:45:40 2015 From: akazakov at exadel.com (Alexey Kazakov) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:45:40 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] N&N for previous releases Message-ID: <55398424.5020006@exadel.com> HI, Currently http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/index.html has N&N for the last versions for each major Eclipse release. 4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.*,... But if you click on 4.2.3 (Luna) for example: open http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/jbosstools/4.2.3.Final.html then there is only N&N for 4.2.3 which have been added since 4.2.2. There are not links to 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2. N&N. So it's not easy to find direct links to N&N pages where you can find the full list of new features for our Luna release (4.2.x) comparing to Kepler (4.1.*). Does it seem weired for me only? From manderse at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 02:55:54 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:55:54 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: 24 unresolved issues with fixversion = Alpha2 In-Reply-To: <553968BC.8080504@redhat.com> References: <553968BC.8080504@redhat.com> Message-ID: <31C4F310-E995-4C67-B1B3-734EDE841603@redhat.com> On 23 Apr 2015, at 23:48, Nick Boldt wrote: > Please resolve (if done) or punt to Beta1 (if not done) these 24 > remaining Alpha2 issues: > > https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%20%3D%20ds_freeze%20and%20filter%20%3D%20ds_unresolved > > Want a query for just *YOUR* issues (or unassigned issues)? Here ya > go: > > https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%20%3D%20ds_freeze%20and%20filter%20%3D%20ds_unresolved%20and%20%28assignee%20%3D%20currentUser%28%29%20or%20assignee%20%3D%20null%29 The better query for this is: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=filter%20%3D%20ds_mystuff%20and%20filter%3Dds_freeze%20and%20filter%3Dds_unresolved Then you don't see unassigned from components you are not leading. /max > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:31:03 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:31:03 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] N&N for previous releases In-Reply-To: <55398424.5020006@exadel.com> References: <55398424.5020006@exadel.com> Message-ID: <5253D142-08C6-4102-9F66-4434AE825376@redhat.com> On 24 Apr 2015, at 1:45, Alexey Kazakov wrote: > HI, > > Currently http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/index.html has > N&N for the last versions for each major Eclipse release. 4.1.*, > 4.2.*, > 4.3.*,... > But if you click on 4.2.3 (Luna) for example: open > http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/jbosstools/4.2.3.Final.html > then there is only N&N for 4.2.3 which have been added since 4.2.2. > There are not links to 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2. N&N. > So it's not easy to find direct links to N&N pages where you can find > the full list of new features for our Luna release (4.2.x) comparing > to > Kepler (4.1.*). > > Does it seem weired for me only? nope - it looks like each minor release was archived too soon. That is only supposed to happen for alpha/betas etc. when the final release is out. Fixed it in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/commit/9f2cf87c9845f3a4bb4d5b3cf4ebe417a722ebcc that should be live soon. /max > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From xcoulon at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 04:01:10 2015 From: xcoulon at redhat.com (Xavier Coulon) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:01:10 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] N&N for previous releases In-Reply-To: <5253D142-08C6-4102-9F66-4434AE825376@redhat.com> References: <55398424.5020006@exadel.com> <5253D142-08C6-4102-9F66-4434AE825376@redhat.com> Message-ID: My bad. A few weeks ago I committed a change to archive old versions of JBoss Tools and reduce the size of the left navigation menu on the N&N page, but in the euphoria I included the 4.2.x.Final versions. /Xavier > On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:31, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > On 24 Apr 2015, at 1:45, Alexey Kazakov wrote: > >> HI, >> >> Currently http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/index.html has >> N&N for the last versions for each major Eclipse release. 4.1.*, >> 4.2.*, >> 4.3.*,... >> But if you click on 4.2.3 (Luna) for example: open >> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/jbosstools/4.2.3.Final.html >> then there is only N&N for 4.2.3 which have been added since 4.2.2. >> There are not links to 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2. N&N. >> So it's not easy to find direct links to N&N pages where you can find >> the full list of new features for our Luna release (4.2.x) comparing >> to >> Kepler (4.1.*). >> >> Does it seem weired for me only? > > nope - it looks like each minor release was archived too soon. > > That is only supposed to happen for alpha/betas etc. when the final > release is out. > > Fixed it in > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/commit/9f2cf87c9845f3a4bb4d5b3cf4ebe417a722ebcc > that should be live soon. > > /max > > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150424/37fc95c4/attachment-0001.html From fbricon at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 00:11:05 2015 From: fbricon at redhat.com (Fred Bricon) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:11:05 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds Message-ID: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> Hi, FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to jbosstools-central master. This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the latest nightly build from http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. What works : - Central is now an html5 page maintained at https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under the hood). - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap 6.3, other target 6.4) - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round trips to dcp server) - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to the existing version. - proxy wizards are injected to search results - external links are opened in a browser window - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be reviewed) - you can build https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage locally (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse with -Djboss.central.webpage.url=file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip or -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. What doesn?t work : - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday - current webpage is served directly from http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ , I need to get https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage built from Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good flexibility in terms of maintenance. - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ service, instead of dcp.jboss.org - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked up directly from eclipse. - title still too big, needs to scale down - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) - project tags should be added - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 and 2 currently) - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on startup - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search bar?s hint text - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of right now. So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150427/81510696/attachment.html From nboldt at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:22:45 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:22:45 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] Message-ID: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> Component leads, please tag your repositories! git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is called jbosstools, also often called origin git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From adietish at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:53:10 2015 From: adietish at redhat.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Dietisheim?=) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:53:10 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> done for OpenShift On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is > called jbosstools, also often called origin > git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD > git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 > > From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:03:14 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:03:14 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] deleted LOCUS versions in JBIDE jira Message-ID: Hi, I noticed I forgotten to delete the LOCUS versions in JBIDE when creating the LOCUS project. Those are now gone. Thus all of LOCUS has now moved to https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/LOCUS, all the deleted versions and its metadata is now there. /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:55:36 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:55:36 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4.3.0.Alpha2 is now available Message-ID: <89BBF6A9-E4FD-4C3E-B6AC-F9025F1259DC@redhat.com> This is a development release aimed at Eclipse 4.5.0.M6 Mars users. Announcement Blog: http://tools.jboss.org/blog/2015-04-28-alpha2-for-mars.html Update Site: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/development/mars/ Update Site Zips: * http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/mars/4.3.0.Alpha2.html * http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/jbosstools4.3.0.x/ Installation instructions: http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/installation.html New + Noteworthy (subject to change): http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/jbosstools/4.3.0.Alpha2.html Schedule / Upcoming Releases: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:41:06 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:41:06 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> Just FYI, you don't need to reply to these emails to confirm the work's done. Thanks, Nick On 04/28/2015 05:53 AM, Andr? Dietisheim wrote: > done for OpenShift > > On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >> >> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >> called jbosstools, also often called origin >> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >> >> > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From ggastald at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:08:25 2015 From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:08:25 -0300 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Done for forge On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Component leads, please tag your repositories! > > git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is > called jbosstools, also often called origin > git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD > git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 > > From ggastald at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:08:58 2015 From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:08:58 -0300 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553F947A.6030505@redhat.com> too late :) On 04/28/2015 10:41 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Just FYI, you don't need to reply to these emails to confirm the work's > done. > > Thanks, > > Nick > > On 04/28/2015 05:53 AM, Andr? Dietisheim wrote: >> done for OpenShift >> >> On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>> >>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>> >>> From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:01:55 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:01:55 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> Message-ID: <46D00026-E4CD-408E-BC99-BA7956400EBB@redhat.com> On 28 Apr 2015, at 15:41, Nick Boldt wrote: > Just FYI, you don't need to reply to these emails to confirm the work's > done. Nick, do you have a script that checks if all done ? /max > Thanks, > > Nick > > On 04/28/2015 05:53 AM, Andr? Dietisheim wrote: >> done for OpenShift >> >> On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>> >>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>> >>> >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From nboldt at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 16:55:57 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:55:57 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <46D00026-E4CD-408E-BC99-BA7956400EBB@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> <46D00026-E4CD-408E-BC99-BA7956400EBB@redhat.com> Message-ID: <553FF3DD.3030002@redhat.com> No, but I have a script that checks if everyone has branched & if root poms are updated, because... * Wrong root pom: prevents builds & blocks releases. * Branching: prevents builds & blocks releases. * Tagging: until we move to a model where tags drive builds, tagging after the release is just icing sugar. You may now commence arguing. :D Nick On 04/28/2015 02:01 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 15:41, Nick Boldt wrote: > >> Just FYI, you don't need to reply to these emails to confirm the work's >> done. > > Nick, do you have a script that checks if all done ? > > /max > >> Thanks, >> >> Nick >> >> On 04/28/2015 05:53 AM, Andr? Dietisheim wrote: >>> done for OpenShift >>> >>> On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>>> >>>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 18:35:56 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:35:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553FF3DD.3030002@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F5886.60802@redhat.com> <553F8DF2.5090503@redhat.com> <46D00026-E4CD-408E-BC99-BA7956400EBB@redhat.com> <553FF3DD.3030002@redhat.com> Message-ID: I'll write the script. Having the tags has been and will be useful in past despite you thinking it is just icing. /max http://about.me/maxandersen > On 28 Apr 2015, at 22:55, Nick Boldt wrote: > > No, but I have a script that checks if everyone has branched & if root poms are updated, because... > > * Wrong root pom: prevents builds & blocks releases. > > * Branching: prevents builds & blocks releases. > > * Tagging: until we move to a model where tags drive builds, tagging after the release is just icing sugar. > > You may now commence arguing. :D > > Nick > >> On 04/28/2015 02:01 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 15:41, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> >>> Just FYI, you don't need to reply to these emails to confirm the work's >>> done. >> >> Nick, do you have a script that checks if all done ? >> >> /max >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Nick >>> >>>> On 04/28/2015 05:53 AM, Andr? Dietisheim wrote: >>>> done for OpenShift >>>> >>>>> On 04/28/2015 12:22 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>>>> >>>>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>>>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>>>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>>>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>> >>> -- >>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >>> http://nick.divbyzero.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:51:53 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:51:53 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ATTENTION REQUIRED: missing tags Message-ID: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags for the various releases. First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: jbosstools-arquillian jbosstools-livereload jbosstools-aerogear jbosstools-hibernate jbosstools-freemarker jbosstools-webservices jbosstools-server jbosstools-portlet jbosstools-download.jboss.org jbosstools-central jbosstools-build-ci jbosstools-birt Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the script a bit more advanced (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" marker to not get false positives: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags jbosstools-server missing 13 tags jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags jbosstools-central missing 5 tags jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags jbosstools-build missing 3 tags jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. Thanks, /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:19:30 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:19:30 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] created 'easymport' component Message-ID: Hi, After seeing incoming issues related to easymport being misclassified I've now created an 'easymport' component lead by mistria. I suggest for issues that are related to easymport + another component (i.e. aerogear-hybrid) has both components set, and if it is purely a easymport issue we can remove the other component. Thanks, /max http://about.me/maxandersen From mmalina at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:20:26 2015 From: mmalina at redhat.com (Martin Malina) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:20:26 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds In-Reply-To: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> References: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> Message-ID: <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> Hi Fred, Great job! I like the design, it looks clean. And the search is super fast. What I don't quite like so much is the carousel. You can't control it and it can be a little distracting. For other arguments see http://shouldiuseacarousel.com :) But maybe it's just me :) And I understand we do want to put the blogs somewhere. -Martin > On 27. 4. 2015, at 6:11, Fred Bricon wrote: > > Hi, > > FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to jbosstools-central master. > This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the latest nightly build from http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ > > It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. > > What works : > - Central is now an html5 page maintained at https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage > - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under the hood). > - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap 6.3, other target 6.4) > - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round trips to dcp server) > - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to the existing version. > - proxy wizards are injected to search results > - external links are opened in a browser window > - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title > - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be reviewed) > - you can build https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage locally (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse with -Djboss.central.webpage.url=file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip or -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. > > What doesn?t work : > - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday > - current webpage is served directly from http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ , I need to get https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage built from Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good flexibility in terms of maintenance. > - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ service, instead of dcp.jboss.org > - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked up directly from eclipse. > - title still too big, needs to scale down > - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) > - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard > - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. > - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) > - project tags should be added > - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. > - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 and 2 currently) > - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on startup > - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. > - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search bar?s hint text > - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of right now. > > So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). > > Fred > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/e7b17c73/attachment.html From rawagner at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:42:10 2015 From: rawagner at redhat.com (Rastislav Wagner) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:42:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds In-Reply-To: <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> References: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1704440780.9070493.1430300530975.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Dont worry, you're not alone who doesn't like carousel. I just wanted to create issue. Lack of control is frustrating :) Rastislav Wagner JBDS QA irc: rawagner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Malina" To: "Fred Bricon" Cc: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:20:26 AM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds Hi Fred, Great job! I like the design, it looks clean. And the search is super fast. What I don't quite like so much is the carousel. You can't control it and it can be a little distracting. For other arguments see http://shouldiuseacarousel.com :) But maybe it's just me :) And I understand we do want to put the blogs somewhere. -Martin On 27. 4. 2015, at 6:11, Fred Bricon < fbricon at redhat.com > wrote: Hi, FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to jbosstools-central master. This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the latest nightly build from http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. What works : - Central is now an html5 page maintained at https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under the hood). - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap 6.3, other target 6.4) - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round trips to dcp server) - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to the existing version. - proxy wizards are injected to search results - external links are opened in a browser window - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be reviewed) - you can build https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage locally (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse with -Djboss.central.webpage.url= file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip or -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. What doesn?t work : - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday - current webpage is served directly from http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ , I need to get https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage built from Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good flexibility in terms of maintenance. - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ service, instead of dcp.jboss.org - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked up directly from eclipse. - title still too big, needs to scale down - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) - project tags should be added - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 and 2 currently) - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on startup - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search bar?s hint text - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of right now. So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). Fred _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:44:10 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:44:10 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds In-Reply-To: <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> References: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> Message-ID: <85995023-234E-4358-9DBD-447CE242A6B9@redhat.com> On 29 Apr 2015, at 11:20, Martin Malina wrote: > Hi Fred, > > Great job! I like the design, it looks clean. And the search is super > fast. > What I don't quite like so much is the carousel. You can't control it > and it can be a little distracting. > For other arguments see http://shouldiuseacarousel.com > :) But maybe it's just me :) > And I understand we do want to put the blogs somewhere. I have the same concern, but I think this small "ticker" is less of a problem than the usual giant carousel's that shouldiuseacarousel.com goes against. At least thats what I feel now - lets see what the feedback is and if we are getting more or less clicks on the entries ;) /max > > -Martin > > >> On 27. 4. 2015, at 6:11, Fred Bricon wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to >> jbosstools-central master. >> This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the >> latest nightly build from >> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ >> >> >> It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of >> what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. >> >> What works : >> - Central is now an html5 page maintained at >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage >> >> - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under >> the hood). >> - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap >> 6.3, other target 6.4) >> - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round >> trips to dcp server) >> - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to >> the existing version. >> - proxy wizards are injected to search results >> - external links are opened in a browser window >> - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title >> - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be >> reviewed) >> - you can build >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage >> locally >> (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse >> with >> -Djboss.central.webpage.url=file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip >> >> or >> -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. >> >> What doesn?t work : >> - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used >> to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday >> - current webpage is served directly from >> http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ >> , I need to get >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage >> built from >> Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good >> flexibility in terms of maintenance. >> - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ >> service, instead of >> dcp.jboss.org >> - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up >> and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked >> up directly from eclipse. >> - title still too big, needs to scale down >> - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the >> quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) >> - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard >> - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. >> - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) >> - project tags should be added >> - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. >> - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 >> and 2 currently) >> - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of >> http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on >> startup >> - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. >> - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel >> script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search >> bar?s hint text >> - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of >> right now. >> >> So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or >> bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). >> >> Fred >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From mistria at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:00:57 2015 From: mistria at redhat.com (Mickael Istria) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:00:57 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] created 'easymport' component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5540ABD9.8030508@redhat.com> On 04/29/2015 11:19 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > After seeing incoming issues related to easymport being misclassified > I've now created an 'easymport' component lead by mistria. > > I suggest for issues that are related to easymport + another component > (i.e. aerogear-hybrid) has both components set, and if it is purely a > easymport issue we can remove the other component. Thank you. That will make things easier. -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/2fa32744/attachment.html From dgolovin at exadel.com Wed Apr 29 11:37:12 2015 From: dgolovin at exadel.com (Denis Golovin) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:37:12 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ATTENTION REQUIRED: missing tags In-Reply-To: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> References: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> Message-ID: I suggested tagging modules that had no changes a while ago and was told no tagging required. That explains for example jbosstools-freemarker is missing 12 tags. I would tag every module w/ and w/o changes, it can be done for all ow them using repo with submodules, becuase we are releasing them all together anyway. Denis On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags > for the various releases. > > First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: > > jbosstools-arquillian > jbosstools-livereload > jbosstools-aerogear > jbosstools-hibernate > jbosstools-freemarker > jbosstools-webservices > jbosstools-server > jbosstools-portlet > jbosstools-download.jboss.org > jbosstools-central > jbosstools-build-ci > jbosstools-birt > > Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the > script a bit more advanced > (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). > > It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" > marker to not get false positives: > > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 > > With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: > https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) > > jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags > jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags > jbosstools-server missing 13 tags > jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags > jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags > jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags > jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags > jbosstools-central missing 5 tags > jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags > jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags > jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags > jbosstools-build missing 3 tags > jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags > jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags > jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags > jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags > jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags > jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags > jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags > jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags > > If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and > otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. > > Thanks, > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/5ca7ad6f/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:57:52 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:57:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ATTENTION REQUIRED: missing tags In-Reply-To: References: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> Message-ID: <6904A361-AAD5-4464-8390-C45457C43580@redhat.com> > On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:45, Denis Golovin wrote: > > I suggested tagging modules that had no changes a while ago and was told no tagging required. That explains for example jbosstools-freemarker is missing 12 tags. Did I say that ? Then I was for sure wrong Imo with our current setup. Should be easy to fix then too :) > I would tag every module w/ and w/o changes, it can be done for all ow them using repo with submodules, becuase we are releasing them all together anyway. Sorry - not following how sub modules relate here ? > > Denis > >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags >> for the various releases. >> >> First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: >> >> jbosstools-arquillian >> jbosstools-livereload >> jbosstools-aerogear >> jbosstools-hibernate >> jbosstools-freemarker >> jbosstools-webservices >> jbosstools-server >> jbosstools-portlet >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >> jbosstools-central >> jbosstools-build-ci >> jbosstools-birt >> >> Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the >> script a bit more advanced >> (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). >> >> It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" >> marker to not get false positives: >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 >> >> With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: >> https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) >> >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags >> jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags >> jbosstools-server missing 13 tags >> jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags >> jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags >> jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags >> jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-central missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags >> jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags >> jbosstools-build missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags >> jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags >> jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags >> >> If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and >> otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. >> >> Thanks, >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/c33788cb/attachment-0001.html From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:59:06 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:59:06 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: missing tags In-Reply-To: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> References: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> Message-ID: <2CE439AB-B1CA-4C84-B9BC-D22B4FAA069F@redhat.com> Post using proper label to hope it will be seen by more eyes. /max http://about.me/maxandersen > On 29 Apr 2015, at 09:54, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags > for the various releases. > > First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: > > jbosstools-arquillian > jbosstools-livereload > jbosstools-aerogear > jbosstools-hibernate > jbosstools-freemarker > jbosstools-webservices > jbosstools-server > jbosstools-portlet > jbosstools-download.jboss.org > jbosstools-central > jbosstools-build-ci > jbosstools-birt > > Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the > script a bit more advanced > (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). > > It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" > marker to not get false positives: > https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 > > With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: > https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) > > jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags > jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags > jbosstools-server missing 13 tags > jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags > jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags > jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags > jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags > jbosstools-central missing 5 tags > jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags > jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags > jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags > jbosstools-build missing 3 tags > jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags > jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags > jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags > jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags > jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags > jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags > jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags > jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags > > If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and > otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. > > Thanks, > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev From fbricon at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:15:07 2015 From: fbricon at redhat.com (Fred Bricon) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:15:07 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds In-Reply-To: <85995023-234E-4358-9DBD-447CE242A6B9@redhat.com> References: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> <85995023-234E-4358-9DBD-447CE242A6B9@redhat.com> Message-ID: I?ll try adding visual indicators (like ???? ) > Le 29 avr. 2015 ? 05:44, Max Rydahl Andersen a ?crit : > > On 29 Apr 2015, at 11:20, Martin Malina wrote: > >> Hi Fred, >> >> Great job! I like the design, it looks clean. And the search is super fast. >> What I don't quite like so much is the carousel. You can't control it and it can be a little distracting. >> For other arguments see http://shouldiuseacarousel.com :) But maybe it's just me :) >> And I understand we do want to put the blogs somewhere. > > I have the same concern, but I think this small "ticker" is less of a problem than the usual giant carousel's that shouldiuseacarousel.com goes against. > > At least thats what I feel now - lets see what the feedback is and if we are getting more or less clicks on the entries ;) > > /max > >> >> -Martin >> >> >>> On 27. 4. 2015, at 6:11, Fred Bricon wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to jbosstools-central master. >>> This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the latest nightly build from http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ >>> >>> It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. >>> >>> What works : >>> - Central is now an html5 page maintained at https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage >>> - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under the hood). >>> - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap 6.3, other target 6.4) >>> - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round trips to dcp server) >>> - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to the existing version. >>> - proxy wizards are injected to search results >>> - external links are opened in a browser window >>> - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title >>> - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be reviewed) >>> - you can build https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage locally (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse with -Djboss.central.webpage.url=file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip or -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. >>> >>> What doesn?t work : >>> - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday >>> - current webpage is served directly from http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ , I need to get https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage built from Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good flexibility in terms of maintenance. >>> - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ service, instead of dcp.jboss.org >>> - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked up directly from eclipse. >>> - title still too big, needs to scale down >>> - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) >>> - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard >>> - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. >>> - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) >>> - project tags should be added >>> - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. >>> - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 and 2 currently) >>> - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on startup >>> - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. >>> - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search bar?s hint text >>> - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of right now. >>> >>> So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). >>> >>> Fred >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen From dgolovin at exadel.com Wed Apr 29 13:34:52 2015 From: dgolovin at exadel.com (Denis Golovin) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:34:52 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ATTENTION REQUIRED: missing tags In-Reply-To: <6904A361-AAD5-4464-8390-C45457C43580@redhat.com> References: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> <6904A361-AAD5-4464-8390-C45457C43580@redhat.com> Message-ID: with https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-releng.git tagging of everything at once would look like: git submodule foreach 'git checkout jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x; git pull origin jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x; git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2; git push origin jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2;' The same can be done with shell or any script we want to use. Denis On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:45, Denis Golovin wrote: > > I suggested tagging modules that had no changes a while ago and was told > no tagging required. That explains for example jbosstools-freemarker is > missing 12 tags. > > > Did I say that ? Then I was for sure wrong Imo with our current setup. > > Should be easy to fix then too :) > > I would tag every module w/ and w/o changes, it can be done for all ow > them using repo with submodules, becuase we are releasing them all together > anyway. > > > Sorry - not following how sub modules relate here ? > > > Denis > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen > wrote: > >> I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags >> for the various releases. >> >> First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: >> >> jbosstools-arquillian >> jbosstools-livereload >> jbosstools-aerogear >> jbosstools-hibernate >> jbosstools-freemarker >> jbosstools-webservices >> jbosstools-server >> jbosstools-portlet >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >> jbosstools-central >> jbosstools-build-ci >> jbosstools-birt >> >> Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the >> script a bit more advanced >> (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). >> >> It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" >> marker to not get false positives: >> >> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 >> >> With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: >> https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) >> >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags >> jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags >> jbosstools-server missing 13 tags >> jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags >> jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags >> jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags >> jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-central missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags >> jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags >> jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags >> jbosstools-build missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags >> jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags >> jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags >> jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags >> jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags >> >> If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and >> otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. >> >> Thanks, >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/3588cb60/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:51:42 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:51:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] new JBoss Central available from nightly builds In-Reply-To: References: <460B656E-D2C2-4F87-98D2-1EB32AF9828F@redhat.com> <446BE661-27A4-4B49-B8E8-E417A3D5505E@redhat.com> <85995023-234E-4358-9DBD-447CE242A6B9@redhat.com> Message-ID: <3DE3A0C6-D64D-400F-87CC-93D11E88B49A@redhat.com> How about just a single link that will show the full carousel/rss ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen > On 29 Apr 2015, at 19:15, Fred Bricon wrote: > > I?ll try adding visual indicators (like ???? ) > >> Le 29 avr. 2015 ? 05:44, Max Rydahl Andersen a ?crit : >> >> On 29 Apr 2015, at 11:20, Martin Malina wrote: >> >>> Hi Fred, >>> >>> Great job! I like the design, it looks clean. And the search is super fast. >>> What I don't quite like so much is the carousel. You can't control it and it can be a little distracting. >>> For other arguments see http://shouldiuseacarousel.com :) But maybe it's just me :) >>> And I understand we do want to put the blogs somewhere. >> >> I have the same concern, but I think this small "ticker" is less of a problem than the usual giant carousel's that shouldiuseacarousel.com goes against. >> >> At least thats what I feel now - lets see what the feedback is and if we are getting more or less clicks on the entries ;) >> >> /max >> >>> >>> -Martin >>> >>> >>>> On 27. 4. 2015, at 6:11, Fred Bricon wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> FYI, I?ve merged the current Central/HTML5 rework to jbosstools-central master. >>>> This means you can see the new Central in action after installing the latest nightly build from http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/mars/ >>>> >>>> It?s far from being complete, but you?ll at least get a taste of what?s to come in JBT 4.3/JBDS 9. >>>> >>>> What works : >>>> - Central is now an html5 page maintained at https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage >>>> - the page is served from a swt browser widget (using webkit under the hood). >>>> - about 220 quickstarts are available as of today (some target eap 6.3, other target 6.4) >>>> - search is craaazy fast, as it is local to the webpage (no round trips to dcp server) >>>> - it?s fast to load and scales better in small windows, compared to the existing version. >>>> - proxy wizards are injected to search results >>>> - external links are opened in a browser window >>>> - JBoss Buzz results visible as carousel under the title >>>> - early access label displayed according to EA settings (UI to be reviewed) >>>> - you can build https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage locally (after installing node and grunt-cli) and test it by starting Eclipse with -Djboss.central.webpage.url=file:///path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/jbosstools-central-webpage-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.zip or -Djboss.central.webpage.url=/path/to/jbosstools-central-webpage/target/gruntbuild. >>>> >>>> What doesn?t work : >>>> - for some reason I just broke the quickstart integration, which used to work, I swear. Will fix it on Monday >>>> - current webpage is served directly from http://central-fredapp.rhcloud.com/ , I need to get https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central-webpage built from Jenkins and deployed to Nexus. At least that gives us some good flexibility in terms of maintenance. >>>> - search engine uses staging dcpbeta-searchisko.rhcloud.com/ service, instead of dcp.jboss.org >>>> - The development workflow isn?t finalized yet. I need to set up and tune grunt watch, so that changes in html/js/sass can be picked up directly from eclipse. >>>> - title still too big, needs to scale down >>>> - offline mode is not supported (both for central and the quickstarts, groovy script not update yet) >>>> - quickstarts not integrated to the existing project examples wizard >>>> - legacy examples are not displays in the results, yet. >>>> - project requirements not inferred yet (from existing metadata?) >>>> - project tags should be added >>>> - maybe find another default icon for quickstarts. >>>> - layout needs to be tuned (needs to scale on 3 cols, instead of 4 and 2 currently) >>>> - needs some tabzilla-like button (see the red hat at top right of http://tools.jboss.org/ ) to display show on startup >>>> - APIs are in still unstable, expect them to break. >>>> - you might notice some slight font flickering, due to the carousel script. I tried to minimize it but it?s still visible in the search bar?s hint text >>>> - many other small stuff that are missing, that I can?t think of right now. >>>> >>>> So, give it a try, we?d be happy to hear some feedback, good or bad, ideas to make it better (JIRA is your friend). >>>> >>>> Fred >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen > From manderse at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:54:42 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ATTENTION REQUIRED: missing tags In-Reply-To: References: <1271287A-83DB-423D-AF9F-DC9A317D56CA@redhat.com> <6904A361-AAD5-4464-8390-C45457C43580@redhat.com> Message-ID: > On 29 Apr 2015, at 19:34, Denis Golovin wrote: > > with https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-releng.git tagging of everything at once would look like: > > git submodule foreach 'git checkout jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x; git pull origin jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x; git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2; git push origin jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2;' > > The same can be done with shell or any script we want to use. Sure. Don't need sub modules for this though. But yeah seems time to enable jbossjenkins user push rights to do these since it's obviously not happening consistently across all repos. I would prefer it actually tagged the sha1 that was used instead of just assumed used. /max > > Denis > >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:45, Denis Golovin wrote: >>> >>> I suggested tagging modules that had no changes a while ago and was told no tagging required. That explains for example jbosstools-freemarker is missing 12 tags. >> >> Did I say that ? Then I was for sure wrong Imo with our current setup. >> >> Should be easy to fix then too :) >> >>> I would tag every module w/ and w/o changes, it can be done for all ow them using repo with submodules, becuase we are releasing them all together anyway. >> >> Sorry - not following how sub modules relate here ? >> >>> >>> Denis >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>> I wrote a script to check how good/bad we were on actually having tags >>>> for the various releases. >>>> >>>> First I found the ones missing the recent Alpha2 tag: >>>> >>>> jbosstools-arquillian >>>> jbosstools-livereload >>>> jbosstools-aerogear >>>> jbosstools-hibernate >>>> jbosstools-freemarker >>>> jbosstools-webservices >>>> jbosstools-server >>>> jbosstools-portlet >>>> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >>>> jbosstools-central >>>> jbosstools-build-ci >>>> jbosstools-birt >>>> >>>> Then I thought about how it was looking for other releases so I made the >>>> script a bit more advanced >>>> (https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files). >>>> >>>> It loads all historical tags of jbosstools-base and with a "since" >>>> marker to not get false positives: >>>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/pull/182/files#diff-015178ddb40125e999fea74a7bb4d3d8R46 >>>> >>>> With this the list is a tad longer (full details at: >>>> https://gist.github.com/maxandersen/8e5c311b7b0f18c95e88) >>>> >>>> jbosstools-download.jboss.org missing 13 tags >>>> jbosstools-freemarker missing 12 tags >>>> jbosstools-server missing 13 tags >>>> jbosstools-build-ci missing 8 tags >>>> jbosstools-aerogear missing 6 tags >>>> jbosstools-hibernate missing 6 tags >>>> jbosstools-birt missing 5 tags >>>> jbosstools-central missing 5 tags >>>> jbosstools-portlet missing 5 tags >>>> jbosstools-forge missing 4 tags >>>> jbosstools-webservices missing 4 tags >>>> jbosstools-build missing 3 tags >>>> jbosstools-openshift missing 3 tags >>>> jbosstools-build-sites missing 3 tags >>>> jbosstools-vpe missing 2 tags >>>> jbosstools-livereload missing 2 tags >>>> jbosstools-arquillian missing 2 tags >>>> jbosstools-jst missing 1 tags >>>> jbosstools-discovery missing 1 tags >>>> jbosstools-browsersim missing 1 tags >>>> >>>> If you believe my script reported wrongly on this please let me know and >>>> otherwise i'll create a task jira for these next week. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> /max >>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150429/563416c2/attachment.html From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:10:28 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:10:28 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] antlr packages and lib not exported in Hibernate Tools 4.0.1 In-Reply-To: References: <55353EFE.6040702@exadel.com> Message-ID: <1B447044-6635-41D2-93C0-290914707E33@redhat.com> Bastian - did you get your problem solved ? > On 20 Apr 2015, at 20:01, Alexey Kazakov wrote: > >> First at all, please create an issue in >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE to solve this problem in the >> next release. >> A pull request for https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-hibernate >> would be useful too :) > > please note that we are really trying to limit exposing any of hibernate > internal runtime API's to support multiple versions of Hibernate. Thus > if this break that we won't be able to do it. > > What is your plugin trying to do that needs this level of access ? > > /max >> >> On 04/20/2015 04:44 AM, Bastian Ugimachi wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I am currently working on an Eclipse-Plugin that is built on top of >>> the Hibernate Tools project. For example, I am using the following >>> statements to get the AST of a named query: >>> >>> try { >>> HqlParser parser = HqlParser.getInstance(statementString); >>> parser.statement(); >>> } catch (RecognitionException | TokenStreamException e) { >>> e.printStackTrace(); >>> } >>> AST statementAst = parser.getAST(); >>> >>> For this to work well with Hibernate Tools Version 4.0.0, I added >>> bundle org.hibernate.eclipse.libs as required bundle to my plug-in >>> configuration (which resolved to >>> org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.0.Final-v20141016-1911-B82 so far). >>> >>> However, I now updated to Hiberate Tools 4.0.1 >>> (org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95). The >>> problem I have now is that the following imports cannot be resolved: >>> import antlr.RecognitionException; >>> import antlr.TokenStreamException; >>> import antlr.collections.AST; >>> >>> The problem seems to arise from the fact, that in the new version's >>> MANIFEST.MF, the antlr... packages are not exported and >>> lib/hibernate/antlr-2.7.6.jar is not listed in the Bundle-ClassPath >>> any more (I reformatted both MANIFEST.MFs, that you can find >>> attached, to allow a convenient comparison). After manually adding >>> the antlr-related entries to the new version's MANIFEST.MF, my code >>> works pretty well again. >>> >>> My question is thus: >>> (a) Do you consider this to be a bug in the realease of Hibernate >>> Tools 4.0.1? >>> (b) If yes for (a): Do you have an idea when this issue could be >>> solved? >>> (c) If no for (a): Which alternative solution would you suggest? I >>> mean, manually editing the MANIFEST.MF of realeased plug-ins is not >>> quite the best practice, is it? I tried to manally add >>> antlr-2.7.6.jar as library to my project, which solved the >>> compilation error, but yields a java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>> antlr.LLkParser cannot be found by >>> org.hibernate.eclipse.libs_4.0.1.Final-v20150324-2307-B95 >>> >>> Any advice? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Bastian >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:21:50 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:21:50 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Message-ID: Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it for him. posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. Things the tags are used for: * build of jbosstools at fedora * checking what went into a release when debugging * knowing which components got into a relase Still missing: jbosstools-portlet jbosstools-freemarker jbosstools-hibernate jbosstools-aerogear jbosstools-arquillian jbosstools-download.jboss.org jbosstools-build-ci jbosstools-birt /max > Done for forge > > On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >> >> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >> called jbosstools, also often called origin >> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From dgolovin at exadel.com Thu Apr 30 16:30:32 2015 From: dgolovin at exadel.com (Denis Golovin) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:30:32 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Message-ID: Done for freemarker. Should we run tagging verification script after release is declared and it would keep pinging component leads until tag is created? On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it for > him. > > posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. > > Things the tags are used for: > * build of jbosstools at fedora > * checking what went into a release when debugging > * knowing which components got into a relase > > Still missing: > jbosstools-portlet > jbosstools-freemarker > jbosstools-hibernate > jbosstools-aerogear > jbosstools-arquillian > jbosstools-download.jboss.org > jbosstools-build-ci > jbosstools-birt > > /max > > > Done for forge > > > > On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > >> Component leads, please tag your repositories! > >> > >> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is > >> called jbosstools, also often called origin > >> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD > >> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jbosstools-dev mailing list > > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150430/d41f1606/attachment.html From nboldt at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:54:00 2015 From: nboldt at redhat.com (Nick Boldt) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:54:00 -0400 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55429668.7000102@redhat.com> jbosstools-4.2.3.Final tag created for jbosstools-build (even though we still have https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19744 open pending a fix). For these 2 projects below, branches don't exist for 4.3.0.Alpha2x so I could not create tags. Will create branches for Beta1x and tag next time. * jbosstools-build-ci * jbosstools-download.jboss.org Do you need me to compute which old SHAs map to old tags like 4.0.0.Final or 4.1.0.Beta1? Since those releases are done and we will only ever be building forward from 4.2.x (after 4.2.3.Final) and 4.3.x (after 4.3.0.Alpha2), do we need to go back into the past to create old tags? Nick On 04/30/2015 07:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it for him. > > posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. > > Things the tags are used for: > * build of jbosstools at fedora > * checking what went into a release when debugging > * knowing which components got into a relase > > Still missing: > jbosstools-portlet > jbosstools-freemarker > jbosstools-hibernate > jbosstools-aerogear > jbosstools-arquillian > jbosstools-download.jboss.org > jbosstools-build-ci > jbosstools-birt > > /max > >> Done for forge >> >> On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>> >>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:12:28 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 01:12:28 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 30 Apr 2015, at 22:30, Denis Golovin wrote: > Done for freemarker. thanks! script still finds these missing though. jbosstools-freemarker missing 11 tags: jbosstools-4.1.0.Beta1, jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1, jbosstools-4.1.1.CR1, jbosstools-4.1.1.Final, jbosstools-4.1.2.Final, jbosstools-4.2.0.Alpha1, jbosstools-4.2.0.Beta1, jbosstools-4.2.0.Beta2, jbosstools-4.2.3.Beta1, jbosstools-4.2.3.CR1, jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1 so I assume you just did it for alpha2, right ? > Should we run tagging verification script after release is declared > and it > would keep pinging component leads until tag is created? yeah - but I think I got a script now that can do this via github api meaning I need no git clones etc. just the list of repos and sha1's that our builds should have. see other mail. /max > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen > > wrote: > >> >> Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it >> for >> him. >> >> posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. >> >> Things the tags are used for: >> * build of jbosstools at fedora >> * checking what went into a release when debugging >> * knowing which components got into a relase >> >> Still missing: >> jbosstools-portlet >> jbosstools-freemarker >> jbosstools-hibernate >> jbosstools-aerogear >> jbosstools-arquillian >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >> jbosstools-build-ci >> jbosstools-birt >> >> /max >> >>> Done for forge >>> >>> On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>>> >>>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> /max http://about.me/maxandersen From manderse at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:17:47 2015 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 01:17:47 +0200 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: <55429668.7000102@redhat.com> References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> <55429668.7000102@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 30 Apr 2015, at 22:54, Nick Boldt wrote: > jbosstools-4.2.3.Final tag created for jbosstools-build (even though > we > still have https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19744 open pending a > fix). since that fix was not in when we did 4.2.3.Final then that is the correct state to tag. > For these 2 projects below, branches don't exist for 4.3.0.Alpha2x so > I > could not create tags. Will create branches for Beta1x and tag next > time. > > * jbosstools-build-ci This one seem to be the important one since it has the jenkins jobs in use etc. > * jbosstools-download.jboss.org This one I wasn't sure about - might just make sense to do like we do for website. tag when we push changes live ? > Do you need me to compute which old SHAs map to old tags like > 4.0.0.Final or 4.1.0.Beta1? Since those releases are done and we will > only ever be building forward from 4.2.x (after 4.2.3.Final) and 4.3.x > (after 4.3.0.Alpha2), do we need to go back into the past to create > old > tags? so I created a script that takes a csv file in this format: orgname/reponame1, sha1 orgname/reponame2, sha1 ... and does tagging across all repo listed with name given as input. Now, we have for years said we gathered what went into our builds (repos and their sha1's). So here is the test for that - can you provide me with those so we can generate that csv file and we can fix the tags easily for missed pass commits ? (doesn't have to be today today, but just to know how hard it would be to get this info we've said we collected per build) ...and we can setup this script for future releases too. /max > > Nick > > On 04/30/2015 07:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >> Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it >> for him. >> >> posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. >> >> Things the tags are used for: >> * build of jbosstools at fedora >> * checking what went into a release when debugging >> * knowing which components got into a relase >> >> Still missing: >> jbosstools-portlet >> jbosstools-freemarker >> jbosstools-hibernate >> jbosstools-aerogear >> jbosstools-arquillian >> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >> jbosstools-build-ci >> jbosstools-birt >> >> /max >> >>> Done for forge >>> >>> On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>>> >>>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen From dgolovin at exadel.com Thu Apr 30 19:19:33 2015 From: dgolovin at exadel.com (Denis Golovin) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:19:33 -0700 Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Project leads, please tag your projects [ branch jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x -> tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 ] In-Reply-To: References: <553EB6B5.9040609@redhat.com> <553F9459.8000805@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On 30 Apr 2015, at 22:30, Denis Golovin wrote: > > Done for freemarker. >> > > thanks! > > script still finds these missing though. > > jbosstools-freemarker missing 11 tags: > jbosstools-4.1.0.Beta1, > jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1, > jbosstools-4.1.1.CR1, > jbosstools-4.1.1.Final, > jbosstools-4.1.2.Final, > jbosstools-4.2.0.Alpha1, > jbosstools-4.2.0.Beta1, > jbosstools-4.2.0.Beta2, > jbosstools-4.2.3.Beta1, > jbosstools-4.2.3.CR1, > jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha1 > > so I assume you just did it for alpha2, right ? Yeah, alpha2 only. > > > Should we run tagging verification script after release is declared and it >> would keep pinging component leads until tag is created? >> > > yeah - but I think I got a script now that can do this via github api > meaning I need no > git clones etc. just the list of repos and sha1's that our builds should > have. > > see other mail. > > /max > > > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen > > >> wrote: >> >> >>> Done for livereload and webservices - xcoulon is on PTO so I did it for >>> him. >>> >>> posted here since getting these tags recorded are important. >>> >>> Things the tags are used for: >>> * build of jbosstools at fedora >>> * checking what went into a release when debugging >>> * knowing which components got into a relase >>> >>> Still missing: >>> jbosstools-portlet >>> jbosstools-freemarker >>> jbosstools-hibernate >>> jbosstools-aerogear >>> jbosstools-arquillian >>> jbosstools-download.jboss.org >>> jbosstools-build-ci >>> jbosstools-birt >>> >>> /max >>> >>> Done for forge >>>> >>>> On 04/27/2015 07:22 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>> >>>>> Component leads, please tag your repositories! >>>>> >>>>> git fetch jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2x #assuming remote is >>>>> called jbosstools, also often called origin >>>>> git tag jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 FETCH_HEAD >>>>> git push jbosstools jbosstools-4.3.0.Alpha2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20150430/238c906f/attachment.html