[jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Beta2 Code Freeze Task JIRAs / Code Freeze is tomorrow Thurs July 16

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Wed Jul 15 17:03:05 EDT 2015


There are no need to rebuild anything if the only purpose is to update 
the license feature.

Just need to tag what is used in the build.

/max


> The only things we've changed are the version (so it's greater than 
> the version in 4.2.x), the license address (using the new license 
> feature) [1], and the use of JUnit 4.12 instead of 3.8 (because of 
> Mars TP changes) in the test plugins.
>
> Nothing FUNCTIONAL in Portlet's actual (non-test) plugins has changed 
> since 4.2.x. All the above changes were done JUST IN CASE we had 
> actual code to change so that this meta-work wouldn't stand in the way 
> of doing maintenance if needed.
>
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19826
>
> As portlet's not part of the base JBDS install (only a connector in 
> JBT/JBDS Central) no one installing JBDS BYOE or JBT via Marketplace 
> will see a disparity of license terms (eg., when installing two 
> different JBT features simultaneously).
>
> Only someone who intentionally chooses to install it from the WebTools 
> category of the update site (or selects ALL features from the update 
> site) or selects the Central connector will even get it installed, and 
> see the old license address.
>
> ---
>
> So I would say no, unless we REALLY need the new license's contact 
> address.
>
> Max, Richard, would you agree? Or do we need to rebuild Portlet simply 
> to update its license's contact address?
>
> (Related: do we need to rebuild Xulrunner and Locus too?)
>
>
> On 07/15/2015 02:34 PM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>> Should we create a branch for portlet?
>>
>> Snjeza
>>
>> On 7/15/2015 4:29 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>> Here are your task jiras. Note that to reduce email clutter, you 
>>> don't
>>> need to assign these to yourself & then click "Start Progress".
>>>
>>> You can just do the work and close them when done, which produces 
>>> only a
>>> single JIRA email instead of 2 or 3.
>>>
>>> Aerogear          : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20268
>>> VPE               : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20270
>>> Integration Tests : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20271
>>> Server            : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20273
>>> Hibernate         : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20274
>>> Base              : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20275
>>> OpenShift         : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20276
>>> Playground        : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20277
>>> JavaEE            : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20278
>>> JST               : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20279
>>> Forge             : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20280
>>> Birt              : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20281
>>> BrowserSim        : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20282
>>> Webservices       : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20283
>>> Arquillian        : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20284
>>> Freemarker        : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20285
>>> Central           : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20286
>>> LiveReload        : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20287
>>>
>>> and for me:
>>>
>>> JBDS              : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3483
>>> JBoss Tools       : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20267
>>> Central Discovery : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20269
>>> build, build-sites, build-ci, maven-plugins, dl.jb.org, devdoc,
>>> versionwatch: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20272
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list