[jbosstools-dev] Regarding launchbar contribution

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On 20 May 2015, at 20:15, Rob Stryker wrote:

> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=467604
>
> > Have wtp-dev suggested a name for it ?
>
> No, so far there are no comments on the bugzilla. I suggest you 
> comment there if you so choose.
>
> >  btw. does the launchbar work with local java apps and units too ?
>
> I probably need more of an explanation as to what you're asking, but, 
> yes, it works for POJP and other launch configs as well. I've 
> successfully seen MyMainClass in the list and run them.

How does that work ? ..what is selected on the right side for that ?

> But running a simple MyMainClass on some remote server doesn't work, 
> if thats your question. Is that something you'd like to see?

Well, since we are looking at having Docker integrated being able to run 
on java app on a docker container would be a usecase to look at
if this could fit in here.

/max

> On 05/20/2015 03:37 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> Have wtp-dev suggested a name for it ?
>>
>> btw. does the launchbar work with local java apps and units too ?
>>
>> I just realised we've been focusing purely on remote/server runs - 
>> but
>> local runs should work too.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>> Since JBT 4.3.0.Final is slated for after Mars SR1, this seems 
>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> You don't technically need to have the same IU names to allow a 
>>> seamless
>>> upgrade from o.j.t.whatever to o.eclipse.wtp.whatever.
>>>
>>> We've seen multiple instances where a JBoss project moved to 
>>> Eclipse,
>>> and we were able to support the IU rename using a p2.inf 
>>> instruction.
>>>
>>> Here's what we did to rename from com.jboss.jbds to 
>>> com.jboss.devstudio:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/jbosstools-4.2.x/features/com.jboss.devstudio.core.feature/p2.inf#L1-L5
>>>
>>> We've done similar with m2e-wtp, too.
>>>
>>> But of course it's simpler if we just build the plugin using the 
>>> future
>>> o.e.wtp name, and a lower version.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/19/2015 04:58 PM, Rob Stryker wrote:
>>>> Hi All:
>>>>
>>>> wtp-dev mailing list seems to indicate its a bit too late to get 
>>>> such a
>>>> contribution into Mars. They did suggest it might be reasonable for 
>>>> SR1.
>>>>
>>>> With that in mind, we should discuss how to go about getting this 
>>>> into
>>>> JBT for our Mars release, while still allowing it to be removed /
>>>> overridden by the eventual contribution to SR1.
>>>>
>>>> As of now, it seems the thing most important to discuss is naming 
>>>> of the
>>>> plugin, to ensure that the name we use matches with the WTP one. 
>>>> The
>>>> idea seems to be that if we release this plugin as 0.9.0 in JBT,  
>>>> it can
>>>> be added to WTP for Mars SR1 with a higher version, thus replacing 
>>>> ours.
>>>>
>>>> The issue at wtp can be discussed here:
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=467604
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Nick:  Any ideas on whether this plan makes sense?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen