[jbosstools-dev] FYI: now building 4.3.1.CR1 // 4.3.1.Beta2x effectively frozen

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

I'm not following here. Why do we need cr bits on Wednesday ? Are we back again at having zero time between the beta and cr1?

I thought we pushed the dates to avoid exactly this. 

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen


> On 28 Jan 2016, at 22:23, Nick Boldt <nboldt at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, but if we need CR1 bits available on Wed, we need to build them first. :D
> 
> So, we're building them now. 
> 
> Regarding the (c) issue, I've backed up all the snapshots build folders from 4.3.1.Beta2a so IFF we need a respin-b, we can use them as input.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Leonard Dimaggio <ldimaggi at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Can we just finish Beta2 first? Qe should complete its testing on January 29 - and then we should ship on Feb 2.
>> 
>> -- Len
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Alexey Kazakov <alkazako at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> There was some misunderstanding during our long discussion in HipChat.
>>> But long story short.
>>> Beta2 is our priority right now. If building a new CR1 built (from 4.3.x
>>> branch) may cause additional risks for Beta2 release then let's DO NOT
>>> do any CR1 build until we release Beta2.
>>> For example the c) from the list below is exactly such a risk we want to
>>> avoid.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> On 01/28/2016 01:33 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>> > Alexey has requested that the current pile of 4.3.mars/9.0.mars jobs
>>> > [1] be reconfigured to build from the 4.3.x branch. Currently, they
>>> > are set to build from the 4.3.1.Beta2x branch, in case we need a
>>> > respin.
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevStudio_9.0.mars/
>>> >
>>> > This means that starting from this change, the 4.3.1.Beta2x branch is
>>> > effectively frozen, since we won't be building any CI builds from
>>> > there (unless we switch back).
>>> >
>>> > This also means that IFF we need a Beta2b respin (hopefully unlikely
>>> > since there's really no time in the schedule for it), it will come
>>> > with a bigger-than-normal cost:
>>> >
>>> > a) I will have to delete all the CR1 CI builds so they don't pollute
>>> > the Beta2 aggregation with the wrong BUILD_ALIAS qualifiers
>>> > b) I will have to switch the jobs back to use the 4.3.1.Beta2x branch
>>> > c) I will have to build THE WHOLE STACK, not just the jobs which
>>> > caused the respin (ie., for respin-a we only rebuilt Base and
>>> > Openshift, then the JBT and JBDS aggregates & discovery sites). This
>>> > will create what looks like a much larger diff for QE since the
>>> > qualifiers will be incremented even though bitwise the contents are
>>> > the same.
>>> >
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Len DiMaggio (ldimaggi at redhat.com)
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>> 314 Littleton Road
>> Westford, MA 01886  USA
>> tel:  978.392.3179
>> cell: 781.472.9912
>> http://www.redhat.com
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/ldimaggio
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20160129/2353968a/attachment.html