[jbosstools-dev] JavaFX and GTK3

Max Rydahl Andersen manderse at redhat.com
Wed May 11 06:24:02 EDT 2016


Doug gave up on SWT/JFX port - so I would consider that venue dead.

/max

> I dont think so. For this to be viable we'd need an implementation of 
> SWT based on JavaFX. There was an effort some time ago, that got 
> traction at first and stalled when they afair discovered incompatible 
> disparities btw. SWT and JavaFX (was it the event loop et all?).
>
> https://cdtdoug.ca/2014/03/02/an-swt-free-workbench/
>
> Their loose plan now is to migrate the IDE to JavaFX leaving SWT alone 
> (but dont expect this to be successful any time soon, it's a huge 
> task. And then who would migrate existing plugins?)
> On 05/11/2016 08:09 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can this piece of news 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2016-May/019100.html 
>> help us to remove complexity dealing with multiple GTK versions?
>>
>> Cheers
>> -- 
>> Mickael Istria
>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets 
>> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev


> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20160511/fe69903a/attachment.html 


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list