<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
It will be CR1.<br>
<br>
/max<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1236096293.4104.1.camel@localhost.localdomain"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain
DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss
Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Anton,
I'm not sure if JBDS 2.0.0 GA will bundle Drools 5 CR1 or Drools 5 GA, but in either case this
change in the Guvnor tools provider text will be present.
-- John
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:58 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello John,
So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain
DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss
Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right?
Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 4:52:18 PM, you wrote:
John> It should be JBoss, a division of Red Hat. That change has been make in
John> the Drools 5 code base, and we'll pick it up with the next Drools 5
John> milestone.
John> -- John
John> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:36 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Should JBoss Guvnor Tools Plug-in have JBoss.org Provider name or it
it should have JBoss, a Division of Red Hat?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org">jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>