<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4A9F9310.60908@exadel.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">1.9
and will not work with older versions.
See here <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/atf-dev/msg00600.html">http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/atf-dev/msg00600.html</a>
Is it time for us to move on XR1.9?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">do we have a way to fix the missing features in XR1.9 ?
I recall last time that drag'n'drop and selection were affected ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->DnD has been working normaly, as i remember.
Selection has been affected only on
OSX(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368608">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368608</a>) and workaround
exists.
</pre>
</blockquote>
What is that workaround ? I couldn't spot it in the comments.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4A9F9310.60908@exadel.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What does ATF do ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->What does it mean, is it about which functionality have atf?
</pre>
</blockquote>
They also depend on similar features of xulrunner that we do - if they
already fixed some thing we can reuse if<br>
it makes sense or if they fixed it bad not how to do it.<br>
<br>
Anyhow, I went back through the archives and found the following issues
to be what we have discussed before:<br>
<br>
1) The Selection area as described above. If that only affects Mac and
there is a maintainable workaround that should be fine.<br>
<br>
2) Platform availability - can we get or produce a xulrunner 1.9 binary
for all our supported platforms ? x86_64 bit ? Mac Cocoa/Carbon ?<br>
<br>
3) Updatability - will users (of both jboss tools and JBDS) be able to
update to xulrunner 1.9 via our updatesite without conflicts to the
SWT integration/hook/hack ?<br>
<br>
If we can solve/verify these or at least find acceptable workarounds
and there isn't any other known problems then lets move to XulRunner
1.9 after M3 have been released.<br>
<br>
/max<br>
</body>
</html>