As I understood, using both jacoco and emma leads to a problem. I don't know what tool instruments class files first -- but after that the second one is being confused by the invalid LocalVariableTable. <br><br>In <a href="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=883351&aid=3486469&group_id=177969">Jacoco issue</a> it is said that before starting Jacoco already has damaged LocalVariableTable: <i><br>
"While re-transforming classes those broken local variable pointers are set to default value 65532. While the JVM seems to be happy with wrong pointers in a certain range, it fails with the 65532 value."</i><br>
In <a href="https://community.jboss.org/message/631380">community post</a> it is said that jacoco instrumentation confuses emmas.<br><br>I think Mickael Istria or Denis Golovin could provide more details.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
3 апреля 2012 г. 14:14 пользователь Max Rydahl Andersen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:manderse@redhat.com">manderse@redhat.com</a>></span> написал:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
waitup...so we are disabling jacoco because emma can't instrument or because emmas instrumentation confuses jacoco ?<br>
<br>
is there a profile I can use to just get the jacoco stuff and not Emma ?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
/max<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:<br>
<br>
> To avoid a conflict with Emma detected by Denis, jacoco is now disabled and you don't have access to the jacoco.exec file any more.<br>
> Follow <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10537" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10537</a> for more details<br>
> --<br>
> Mickael Istria<br>
> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat<br>
> My blog - My Tweets<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>