<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/30/2012 07:51 PM, Alexey Kazakov
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:503FA804.7060502@exadel.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">To be honest, I ignore Jenkins
emails. My experience shows me that 95% of these problems are
problems of hudson build(s)/environment/... or problems which
I'm already aware of.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
So you mean that Jenkins jobs are not useful for you? If there are
problems with builds/environment, then please open Jiras to explain
what are those problems and how to solve them. Jenkins is meant to
be helpful for you.<br>
I don't think that it's a good idea to rely on build or QE team to
provide feedback on your component build, we can't spend all our
time to look at status of Jenkins job and warn X or Y about an issue
in a build. It should be the reverse process: component developer
look at there CI job, and when they see an error is caused by
Jenkins environment, they push it up to build through a Jira. Or if
not exclusively, it should be both process: Nick/Denis/I monitor
Jenkins to see whether there are some issues, and at the same time
the component team look at their jobs to see whether there are some
issues. We'll probably reduce the feedback loop that way.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:503FA804.7060502@exadel.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Instead of rely on the hudson builds
I regularly run tycho build locally. It safes our time. So
instead of investigating what is going on with hudson builds
every time I got Jenkis email we (CDI/Seam/JSF team) can spend
time on development running local tycho build every other day to
make sure everything is ok on our side.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
I understand that Jenkins has a long time-to-feedback currently.
That's something that is currently discussed to get way shorter
feedback, so it will be more helpful. Doing local build is a very
good habit, and is often more performant than waiting for CI
feedback. But ignoring feedback for CI is just like ignoring a
colleague who says "I can't build", there is a reason, which may be
caused by anyone, and it's necessary to determine what is the reason
and how to solve it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:503FA804.7060502@exadel.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> We mentioned these problems in JIRA
and in emails but the hudson builds is still unstable.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
We are working and make it "faster" and better isolation between
components will make it more stable. But I can understand how
current problems led you to ignore Jenkins mails, that's what we
need to fix ;)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a
href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</body>
</html>