<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western"> Hi all.<br>
<br>
Since we've made significant progress over the last months on
using Jacoco, and that this should now be easier to consume, given
improvements developed as part of <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12742">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12742</a>
, I'm wondering if we still require Emma. Are Emma reports still
used by anyone of you all? If yes, can you please describe why you
prefer Emma reports to Jacoco ones (it's a real question, no
intimidation here ;) ?<br>
Here is how you can access Jacoco reports: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.component--central/">https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.component--central/</a>
. Any suggestion to make it more widely used is welcome.<br>
<br>
Emma is technically obsolete compared to Jacoco, and it costs 100
lines of addition in parent pom (more than 10% of the pom) + a
folder in currenly messy "build" folder. If no-one uses it, I'd
like to remove that stuff to make the parent pom cleaner/simpler.<br>
<br>
Any feedback is highly welcome.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a
href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</div>
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
<a href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria"></a></div>
</body>
</html>