<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/23/2013 11:37 AM, Max Rydahl
Andersen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130323103722.GF37589@slowbeard.local"
type="cite">On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Mickael
Istria wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 03/23/2013 05:41 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Alpha2 (M5 + Jetty 8) and Alpha3 (Kepler
M6 + Atlassian, etc.) won't be
<br>
linked from there until were release JBT 4.1.0.Alpha2
<br>
</blockquote>
Why would we need an Alpha3, and why would we release an Alpha2
?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I assume you mean why would we not just release an Alpha2 so the
latest TP are available to use for next JBT release which
coincidently is named Alpha2 too ?
<br>
</blockquote>
Yes, that's what I mean.<br>
I mainly mean: why do we already have an Alpha3 whereas we still are
doing snapshots of Alpha2. All TP changes until we release a new
milestone of JBT should be in the current snapshot (TP
4.30.5.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT).<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a
href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</body>
</html>