<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Agreed - and stuff shouldn't even be in the published snapshot before some basic checks but that's another topic. <br><br>Sent from a mobile device</div><div><br>On 23/03/2013, at 09.01, Mickael Istria <<a href="mailto:mistria@redhat.com">mistria@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/23/2013 11:37 AM, Max Rydahl
Andersen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130323103722.GF37589@slowbeard.local" type="cite">On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Mickael
Istria wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 03/23/2013 05:41 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Alpha2 (M5 + Jetty 8) and Alpha3 (Kepler
M6 + Atlassian, etc.) won't be
<br>
linked from there until were release JBT 4.1.0.Alpha2
<br>
</blockquote>
Why would we need an Alpha3, and why would we release an Alpha2
?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I assume you mean why would we not just release an Alpha2 so the
latest TP are available to use for next JBT release which
coincidently is named Alpha2 too ?
<br>
</blockquote>
Yes, that's what I mean.<br>
I mainly mean: why do we already have an Alpha3 whereas we still are
doing snapshots of Alpha2. All TP changes until we release a new
milestone of JBT should be in the current snapshot (TP
4.30.5.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT).<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>