<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/14/2013 01:20 PM, Max Rydahl
Andersen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20131114122052.GR33765@slowbeard.local"
type="cite">On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:10:37AM +0100, Mickael
Istria wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 11/14/2013 10:13 AM, Max Rydahl
Andersen wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I definitely think it should be possible
to install these additional dependencies
<br>
since why else should they be listed there ?
<br>
</blockquote>
Can you share your POV on bugs.eclipse.org ? ;)
<br>
</blockquote>
yes, once I understand the usecase of why you would not want these
installed ?
<br>
</blockquote>
I don't know any use-case that drove that choice. It's just that at
the time we developed it, it didn't sound bad to ignore them in a
p2installed scenario. It could simply be a bad choice.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a
href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</body>
</html>