<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>The plan was to tool the bits coming in from aearogear. I think we are still doing that but that will be under FeeedHenry umbrella now. </div><div>I am OK with changing the Aerogear to something like Mobile on the web site because it describes the product better. I guess we can </div><div>add the FeedHenry things when they come under mobile at the web site. </div><div><br></div><div>Aerogear is actually the name of the community project that builds software for mobile development. I do not think having the aerogear name on </div><div>the jbosstool-aerogear repo, jira and the package names would hurt. So let's keep them as it is and only modify the website. </div><div>--</div><div>Gorkem</div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:manderse@redhat.com" target="_blank">manderse@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 14 Nov 2014, at 12:07, Petr Stribny wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> As of right now "Hybrid Mobile (Cordova) Tools" are still referred to<br>
> as "Aerogear" on Jboss Tools website<br>
> (<a href="http://tools.jboss.org/features/aerogear.html" target="_blank">http://tools.jboss.org/features/aerogear.html</a>) and various other<br>
> places (internal Red Hat documents).<br>
><br>
> This is confusing, because the project has no Aerogear specific<br>
> tooling and it is not developed by Aerogear team.<br>
<br>
</span>Gorkem is on the aerogear team. Aerogear is used in the bundle/feature<br>
names for aerogear specific stuff (like the examples).<br>
<br>
I'm not really much for renaming it, more like making it more specific<br>
and add a hybrid-mobile component (we can move the issues over if we<br>
want to).<br>
<br>
Gorkem - any preference ? Earlier on there were plans about more<br>
specific aerogear tools but that have not (yet) manifested itself.<br>
<br>
/max<br>
<span class=""><br>
<br>
><br>
> I propose that we use just "Hybrid Mobile Tools" or similar name when<br>
> talking about branded Thym.<br>
><br>
> What do you think? Is there any reason why to stick with the current<br>
> name?<br>
><br>
> --Petr<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> jbosstools-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org">jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</span>/max<br>
<a href="http://about.me/maxandersen" target="_blank">http://about.me/maxandersen</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
jbosstools-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org">jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>