<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Unfortunately if speaking about
JBIDE-18591 it is not relevant.<br>
<br>
We have more options here:<br>
1) - Update tern so that JBIDE-18591 will be fixed as part of it
(but we already rejected this because of too much risk) <br>
2) - Fix JBIDE-18591 on thym side and release new TP<br>
3) - Move JBIDE-18591 to later version<br>
<br>
My question was about if we go for 2) or 3)<br>
<br>
On 3.12.2014 09:54, Mickael Istria wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:547ECFC8.9020006@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/03/2014 09:28 AM, Pavol Srna
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:547EC9A6.3010705@redhat.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If decided to NO go for tern and angular update - is still the plan to
fix <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18591">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18591</a> on THYM side and do a
quick TP update?
</pre>
</blockquote>
I'm not sure my comment is relevant but TP 4.50.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT
and 4.41.1.CR2-SNAPSHOT were updated to include a newer THyM
yesterday: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18858">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18858</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Pavol Srna
JBoss QA Engineer, JBDS
Phone: +420 532 294 352, +420 774 519 396
Red Hat Czech
Purkynova 99, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic </pre>
</body>
</html>