<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/18/2015 08:56 AM, Max Rydahl
Andersen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:899AD180-884C-482F-B474-6BE5FE7B89D9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The jetty stuff afaik is in best case not *dependent* by SR.1, but
affected by it - but I wouldn't bet on it "just working".</pre>
</blockquote>
I would bet that the Jetty part failed because of using Jetty 9.2.10
and 9.2.13 and facing the ClassNotFoundException on SpinLock
detected in 4.3.0.CR1<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:899AD180-884C-482F-B474-6BE5FE7B89D9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">We might have other being dependent on SR1 though, would be good to hear
what those are.</pre>
</blockquote>
Several fixes depend on SR1. However, I don't know whether the
version range are strictly set to "install" the necessary SR1 part
while installing JBoss Tools.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:899AD180-884C-482F-B474-6BE5FE7B89D9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">btw. the last years we built against SR0 but tested against latest SR.
Did we stop that ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Seems like yes, we stopped that. I can't find any reason except that
we've forgotten to keep it in place, as the jetty issues somehow
forced us to be more careful with SR1 than with SR0.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Mickael Istria<br>
Eclipse developer at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss,
by Red Hat</a><br>
<a href="http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com">My blog</a> - <a
href="http://twitter.com/mickaelistria">My Tweets</a></div>
</body>
</html>