[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBTM-217) Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java
Kevin Conner (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Jul 20 13:16:47 EDT 2007
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=comments#action_12369579 ]
Kevin Conner commented on JBTM-217:
-----------------------------------
The easiest solution is for this to be supported directly by the transaction implementation.
This was a possibility at the time but I can't remember the reason for not doing it.
> Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTM-217
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217
> Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JTA Implementation
> Affects Versions: 4.2.3
> Reporter: Phillip Thurmond
> Assigned To: Andrew Dinn
> Fix For: 4.4
>
> Time Spent: 1 day
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jbossts-issues
mailing list