[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-939) Fix intermittant qa suite failure: org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2

[Michael Musgrove (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729725#comment-12729725 ] 

Michael Musgrove commented on JBTM-939:
---------------------------------------

That last failure was in CrashRecovery02_2_Test28 on hoboken (the other jobs have gone). The original fix was for test CrashRecovery02_2_Test31. So the question is do we keep extending timeouts for specific tests or do we extend the timeout for all tests in group CrashRecovery02_2? What do you think? If we go for extend timeout for specific tests then TEST-org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2.txt tells us which test failed.
                
> Fix intermittant qa suite failure: org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBTM-939
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-939
>             Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: Testing
>            Reporter: Tom Jenkinson
>            Assignee: Michael Musgrove
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.0.0.M2, 4.17.3
>
>         Attachments: crashrecovery02_2.tgz
>
>
> Assuming failure in test rather than failed test:
> >>>>> org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2
> >>>>>      [junit] Tests run: 50, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira