[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1689) "jta" vs. "jts" profile seems duplicate

Weinan Li (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed May 15 10:31:07 EDT 2013


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Weinan Li updated JBTM-1689:
----------------------------

       Priority: Minor  (was: Major)
    Description: 
"jta" vs. "jts" profile, they seem to build the same modules except for ArjunaJTS. 

As maven has some built in options for selecting which modules/directories to build, would it be better to just use those options? Instead of defining profiles, it might look something like "mvn install -pl common,ArjunaCore" instead of the build profile "mvn install -Pcore"

  was:
Currently we have tanuki in these components:

{code}
ArjunaCore/arjuna/services/pom.xml
ArjunaJTS/narayana-jts-idlj/pom.xml
ArjunaJTS/narayana-jts-jacorb/pom.xml
pom.xml
{code}

{code}
    <dependency>
      <groupId>tanukisoft</groupId>
      <artifactId>wrapper</artifactId>
      <version>${version.tanukisoft}</version>
    </dependency>
{code}

We need to remove these dependencies from eap6 profile according to comments from Fernando:

{quote}
We do not ship  tanukiwrapper with the AS (the windows on is an exceptional case and for different reasons).

It is not in the AS7 dependencies, and it will be hard for Support to
properly rebuild TS in the field.
{quote}

btw, there are two classes we need to remove from eap6 profile which depends on tanuki wrapper:

{code}
ArjunaCore/arjuna/classes/com/arjuna/ats/arjuna/services/recovery/RecoveryManagerService.java
ArjunaJTS/jts/services/classes/com/arjuna/ats/jts/services/transactionserver/TransactionServerService.java
{code}



    
> "jta" vs. "jts" profile seems duplicate
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBTM-1689
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1689
>             Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: Build System
>    Affects Versions: 4.17.4
>            Reporter: Weinan Li
>            Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
>            Priority: Minor
>
> "jta" vs. "jts" profile, they seem to build the same modules except for ArjunaJTS. 
> As maven has some built in options for selecting which modules/directories to build, would it be better to just use those options? Instead of defining profiles, it might look something like "mvn install -pl common,ArjunaCore" instead of the build profile "mvn install -Pcore"

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the jbossts-issues mailing list