[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-2854) XATerminatorImple.importTransaction can produce ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

Tom Jenkinson (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Thu Feb 23 06:21:00 EST 2017


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13368035#comment-13368035 ] 

Tom Jenkinson commented on JBTM-2854:
-------------------------------------

There is a critical issue here but it's rather in the way WFTC is not attempting to pass in the full Xid. 

The reason I downgraded the JBTM to Major is that you have to pass us more data in the Xid than the gtrid so even making a better error message it would be for something that should not happen. 

You have to pass us the Xid of the parent SubordinateTransaction for importing of the propagated transaction so that when you call doRecover with the parent node name we can give you the right set of transactions back. 

You could think of the interface for importing transactions as:
importTransaction(byte[] gtrid, String parent)

The parent name for importing is part of the Xid in the propagator node and can be determined before propagation using:
((com.arjuna.ats.jta.transaction.Transactio) transactionManagerService.getTransactionManager().getTransaction()).getTxId(); // The Javadoc is not clear, for subordinate transactions data is included in the Xid beyond the gtrid

Note that passing a dummy bqual with zerod data would not fully work because of the reason that we wouldn't be able to record the correct parent node name. This would mean in a recovery situation the parent would need to be sure to directly scan all known servers - reducing the opportunity to clean up partially completed transactions to when the root coordinator was online. That might well work but it wasn't designed that way and so lots of tests will fail (and the slower recovery I just mentioned). Recovery for EJB remoting was designed to go A -> B -> C rather than A -> C.

> XATerminatorImple.importTransaction can produce ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBTM-2854
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2854
>             Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JTA
>            Reporter: David Lloyd
>            Assignee: Michael Musgrove
>
> Here is what the stack trace looks like:
> {noformat}
> Caused by: Remote exception java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 32
>         at com.arjuna.ats.jta.xa.XATxConverter.getSubordinateNodeName(XATxConverter.java:204)
>         at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.subordinate.jca.SubordinateAtomicAction.<init>(SubordinateAtomicAction.java:115)
>         at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.subordinate.jca.TransactionImple.<init>(TransactionImple.java:57)
>         at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.jca.TransactionImporterImple.addImportedTransaction(TransactionImporterImple.java:281)
>         at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.jca.TransactionImporterImple.importRemoteTransaction(TransactionImporterImple.java:105)
>         at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.jca.XATerminatorImple.importTransaction(XATerminatorImple.java:599)
>         at org.wildfly.transaction.client.provider.jboss.JBossLocalTransactionProvider$XAImporterImpl.findOrImportTransaction(JBossLocalTransactionProvider.java:585)
>         ... 11 more
> {noformat}
> It appears that there is no protection against an XID of inadequate length in XATxConverter#setSubordinateNodeName.
> At present the protocol is attempting to import an XID which contains only the gtid from the master node (based on what I discussed with [~tomjenkinson] some time ago at a previous meeting).  This can be changed if it is wrong, but either way this method should fail with a friendlier exception if the XID is not valid for some reason.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)


More information about the jbossts-issues mailing list