<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Any direction on this? I want to get past this issue today without
having to spend too much time digging into the details of the tck test
harness.<br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
 cellspacing="0">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">Subject: </th>
      <td>Re: TCK5 status (06/20)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">Date: </th>
      <td>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:49:04 -0700</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">From: </th>
      <td>Scott Stark <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sstark@redhat.com">&lt;sstark@redhat.com&gt;</a></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">To: </th>
      <td>Rajesh Rajasekaran <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rrajasek@redhat.com">&lt;rrajasek@redhat.com&gt;</a></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">CC: </th>
      <td>JavaEE-TCK <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:javaeetck@jboss.org">&lt;javaeetck@jboss.org&gt;</a></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">References: </th>
      <td><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:1213949201.3626.4.camel@nymph.grauwnet.nerdnet.nl">&lt;1213949201.3626.4.camel@nymph.grauwnet.nerdnet.nl&gt;</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:485B6D93.20505@redhat.com">&lt;485B6D93.20505@redhat.com&gt;</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:1213951820.10747.10.camel@localhost.localdomain">&lt;1213951820.10747.10.camel@localhost.localdomain&gt;</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:485B71E4.9080209@redhat.com">&lt;485B71E4.9080209@redhat.com&gt;</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:485BBF63.8010009@redhat.com">&lt;485BBF63.8010009@redhat.com&gt;</a></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>I have assigned JBCTS-814 back to Heiko as I don't see how the 
getSharedObject() value the client is using to obtain the service 
relates to anything we are setting up in the client. This test does not 
use injection, and the client env has a binding for the service, so let 
me know how this is supposed to propagate to the test service field.

Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
&gt; Overall: 93.95%
&gt; 4.38% increase from last week
&gt;
&gt; Modules at 100%
&gt; interop-integration, interop-naming, interop-rmiiiop, 
&gt; interop-security, interop-tx, interop-csiv2, saaj
&gt;
&gt; ejb3-core - (74% - back to and better than Beta4 results)
&gt; However down from the 78% yesterday (Blocker), due to changes put in 
&gt; for JBCTS-540, Carlo investigating, follow up on separate thread.
&gt;
&gt; ejb3-persistence - At 99%, up 7% from last week - outstanding issues 
&gt; on spreadsheet
&gt;
&gt; Blockers:
&gt; (Affecting webservices, webservices12, jws, jaxws, jaxrpc, 
&gt; interop-webservices)
&gt; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-814">http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-814</a>
&gt; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-813">http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-813</a>
&gt;
&gt; The spreadsheet has been updated to reflect the latest outstanding 
&gt; JIRA's.
&gt;
&gt; Modules certified: 24
&gt; Modules remaining : 13
&gt;
&gt; Detailed results:
&gt; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://svn.corp.jboss.com/repos/tck/reports/weekly/TCK5-JBossAS5.0.0.GA.xls">https://svn.corp.jboss.com/repos/tck/reports/weekly/TCK5-JBossAS5.0.0.GA.xls</a> 
&gt;
&gt; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/CTS50TestResults.html">http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/CTS50TestResults.html</a>
&gt;
&gt; Adding comments from Dimitris which summarizes the status.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
&gt;&gt; The best TCK results we've got with Beta4 had:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; assembly          - 7 failures
&gt;&gt; ejb               - 4 failures
&gt;&gt; ejb30+persistence - 313 failures
&gt;&gt; jacc              - 2 failures
&gt;&gt; servlet           - 2 failures
&gt;&gt; signature         - 4 failures
&gt;&gt;                  --------------
&gt;&gt;                    332
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; So we need to get rid of:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; appclient           - 3 failures
&gt;&gt; jaxrpc              - 245 failures
&gt;&gt; jaxws               - 709  failures
&gt;&gt; (servlet)           - 10 failures
&gt;&gt; webservices         - 156 failures
&gt;&gt; jws                 - 101 failures
&gt;&gt; webservices12       - 61 failures
&gt;&gt; interop-webservices - 67 failures
&gt;&gt;                    ----------------
&gt;&gt;                      1352 failures
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Or more or less all the webservice (+appclient +couple of servlet 
&gt;&gt; ones) regression.
&gt;&gt;                                                                     
&gt;&gt;                                                                     
&gt;&gt;                                                                     
&gt;&gt;                                                                     
&gt;&gt;                                                             My read 
&gt;&gt; of the last 2 TCK runs is that:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; We got significant (+3.5%) improvement from:
&gt;&gt; - Ales' VFS fix
&gt;&gt; - Stefan's stubs resolution
&gt;&gt; - Rejesh descriptor fixes
&gt;&gt; - JBossXB update
&gt;&gt; - ... other changes I forget
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; We got sidetracked (-0.5%) by
&gt;&gt; - the JBCTS-540 (+metadata org.jboss.metadata.jbmeta11) hack, that 
&gt;&gt; probably conflicts with Scott's "change the LegacyEjb3JndiPolicy ejb3 
&gt;&gt; REMOTE_HOME to ejbName/home from baseJndiName+"Home"
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; And the upgrade to ejb3-core 0.1.5 was not performed as yet.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; The current pass rate for tck is 93.95%
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Since most of the other release criteria are met (Seam is running, AS 
&gt;&gt; testsuite in good shape, AS JIRA almost there) I think the EJB3 team 
&gt;&gt; together with Scott should focus on the JNDI issue resolved *ASAP*.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Ales is looking at the other VFS issue + profileservice, while 
&gt;&gt; everyone else keeps closing JBAS/JBCTS tasks or continues with AS 
&gt;&gt; testsuite improvements.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; If you manage to tackle the JNDI issue and we get a good TCK run, we 
&gt;&gt; should be able to release early next week.
&gt;

</pre>
</body>
</html>