[jbossws-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBWS-3264) Don't use log4j configuration classes in our CXF tools - identify possible workarounds

Alessio Soldano (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Apr 11 18:47:33 EDT 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594902#comment-12594902 ] 

Alessio Soldano commented on JBWS-3264:
---------------------------------------

Btw, that hack is most likely a remaining of something pre-AS7, it should definitely be removed / done differently.

> Don't use log4j configuration classes in our CXF tools - identify possible workarounds
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBWS-3264
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3264
>             Project: JBoss Web Services
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>            Reporter: Richard Opalka
>             Fix For:  jbossws-cxf-4.0
>
>
> <opalka> dmlloyd, I found ugly dependency - http://fpaste.org/9UXj/
> <stuartdouglas> opalka: I actually hacked up something last night to try and find those problems 
> <opalka> dmlloyd, stuartdouglas this is the call resulting to this dependency - we're using log4j configurators - http://fpaste.org/aKXp/
> <dmlloyd> why?
> <dmlloyd> (a) you shouldn't do that, (b) to fix the problem add "javax.api" to log4j's module dep
> <opalka> dmlloyd, this is question for alessio. I have no idea? Probably Alessio want's to use log4j config facility
> <dmlloyd> ok well if we're doing that it's pretty lame because we go through many hoops to avoid using the log4j config facility
> <opalka> dmlloyd, method javadoc isn't more descriptive as well - http://fpaste.org/DyVx/ I'll need to ask Alessio
> <opalka> dmlloyd, but just to confirm, we don't want org.apache.logging -> org.w3c.dom dependency in AS7, right ?
> * opalka don't like this dependency 
> <dmlloyd> no, org.apache.logging is something completely different
> <dmlloyd> it should be org.apache.log4j -> javax.api
> <opalka> dmlloyd, and do we want this dependency ?
> <dmlloyd> yeah, it's fine to add
> <dmlloyd> but we don't want this manual log4j configuration

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the jbossws-issues mailing list