[jbossws-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBWS-3777) CXF-5645: wsp:Optional isn't adhered to for WS-RM policy in WSDL

Alessio Soldano (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Tue Apr 1 08:59:13 EDT 2014


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alessio Soldano updated JBWS-3777:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: jbossws-cxf-5.0

    
> CXF-5645: wsp:Optional isn't adhered to for WS-RM policy in WSDL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBWS-3777
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3777
>             Project: JBoss Web Services
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: jbossws-cxf
>    Affects Versions: jbossws-cxf-4.2.3
>         Environment: Red Hat JBoss EAP 6.2.0
>            Reporter: Tadayoshi Sato
>             Fix For: jbossws-cxf-5.0
>
>         Attachments: ws-rm.zip
>
>
> Please port the fix for [CXF-5645|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5645] to JBoss WS CXF.
> Here is the original issue description:
> The {{wsp:Optional}} attribute doesn't work for WS-RM in JBoss WS CXF. As far as the specs tell both WS-Addressing 1.0 and WS-RM 1.1 should support {{wsp:Optional}}, that is, if {{wsp:Optional}} is set to {{true}} on a WS-RM policy the WS-RM policy should become optional -- the endpoint should allow both messages with and without WS-RM \[1\]. However, my experimentation showed that it actually doesn't.
> What I did is as follows (see the attached reproducer for details):
> # Configured in WSDL ({{greeting.wsdl}}) an endpoint as optionally WS-RM enabled like the following:
> {code:xml}
>     <wsdl:binding name="GreetingServiceSoapBinding" type="tns:GreetingService">
>         <wsp:Policy xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/2006/07/ws-policy">
>             <wsam:Addressing xmlns:wsam="http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata"
>                 wsp:Optional="true" />
>             <wsrmp:RMAssertion xmlns:wsrmp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm/policy"
>                 wsp:Optional="true" />
>         </wsp:Policy>
>         ...
> {code}
> # Sent a WS-RM unaware (= no SOAP header) SOAP request from the client but got the following SOAP Fault:
> {code:xml}
> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
>   <soap:Body>
>     <soap:Fault>
>       <faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode>
>       <faultstring>WS-Addressing is required by this endpoint.</faultstring>
>     </soap:Fault>
>   </soap:Body>
> </soap:Envelope>
> {code}
> [1] In WS-RM Policy 1.1 p.8:
> {quote}
> /wsrmp:RMAssertion/@wsp:Optional="true"
> Per WS-Policy, this is compact notation for two policy alternatives, one with and one without the assertion. The intuition is that the behavior indicated by the assertion is optional, or in this case, that WS-ReliableMessaging MAY be used.
> {quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the jbossws-issues mailing list