[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: task component interface comments

[tom.baeyens@jboss.com]

TaskBuilder is definitely not good.

Task with setter is the way to go.

If we would not like the Task return value on the setters, then we should make them void and disable the fluent interface.

But that brings me to the point that I didn't see a good argument against return Task from the setters.  the JavaBean spec and reflection frameworks arguments don't make sense in my opinion.

But it is not a big deal.  Alejandro, you take your pick of the return values for the setters.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195174#4195174

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195174