[jbpm-dev] 'enterprise' version not realy enterprisy on JBoss AS
Tom Baeyens
tbaeyens at redhat.com
Mon Nov 17 05:44:14 EST 2008
Alejandro,
This is another example why I think we should first focus on the JobExecutor, and
only as a second priority build out the JMS/EjbTimer bindings.
If we focus on 1 solution and make sure that works in all cases, it will be easier
then trying to focus on 2 solutions at once.
regards, tom.
Ronald van Kuijk wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Is this a scalability issue?
>
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131832&start=10
> <http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131832&start=10>
>
> Should we mention it somewhere?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
--
regards, tom.
More information about the jbpm-dev
mailing list