[jbpm-dev] 'enterprise' version not realy enterprisy on JBoss AS

Tom Baeyens tbaeyens at redhat.com
Mon Nov 17 05:44:14 EST 2008


Alejandro,

This is another example why I think we should first focus on the JobExecutor, and 
only as a second priority build out the JMS/EjbTimer bindings.

If we focus on 1 solution and make sure that works in all cases, it will be easier 
then trying to focus on 2 solutions at once.

regards, tom.



Ronald van Kuijk wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Is this a scalability issue?
> 
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131832&start=10 
> <http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131832&start=10>
> 
> Should we mention it somewhere?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev

-- 
regards, tom.




More information about the jbpm-dev mailing list