[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: comments on initial xsd jpdl 4
kukeltje
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Nov 21 05:02:41 EST 2008
"thomas.diesler at jboss.com" wrote : Yes, a general extension mechanism should be put in place that allows the GPD and other consumers of the jPDL to extend the definition in an appropriate way.
|
| GPD concerns should not leak into the jPDL XSD
Funny, this latter remark is a 180 degree turn from what was initially the idea. Making one jpdl file with process and graphical info in it instead of having to keep two files in sync. The 'general extension machanism' is using good extensionpoints in the xsd.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191166#4191166
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191166
More information about the jbpm-dev
mailing list