[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: meeting context

[heiko.braun@jboss.com]

anonymous wrote : 
  | Afaik, but could not find it directly, BPMN is based on structured graphs
  | 

Well, we just borrow the terminology (i.e. parallel gateway) and need think about what it means for the implementation. This is exactly the kind discussion I'd like to have. 

anonymous wrote : 
  | In JPDL 3 it is fully clear, you need a fully nested fork-join pair. This differs from the statement in the workflow patterns for parallel split: 
  | 

Exactly, hence the need for verification. What you said about previous discussions is something I don't agree with at all:

anonymous wrote : 
  | This has been discussed several years ago, so unless bpmn requires otherwise, the decision for this is simple I think ;-) 
  | 

Let's put it the other way around: Why did all the vendors support  workflowpatterns.com [1] and BPMN [2] opposed to jbpm? 

[1] http://www.workflowpatterns.com/vendors/
[2] http://www.bpmn.org/BPMN_Supporters.htm#current



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4181019#4181019

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4181019