[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Behavior when next state in a

[camunda]

anonymous wrote : 
  | So my conclusion would be that the target usage of the console would still be:
  | - RAD (initial demonstration of a process)
  | - management things.
  | 
+1
anonymous wrote : 
  | So I still think a component library that directly knows how to interact with jBPM is something that would be/is great to provide. 
  | 
+1! But the problem may be, which technology to provide. But I think Facelets weren't such a bad idea...

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185940#4185940

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185940