[jbpm-dev] Re: BI in 3.3.0.GA

[Tom Baeyens]

ok.  thanks for the update.

regards, tom.


Heiko Braun wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 09:01 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote:
>> Heiko Braun wrote:
>>> The console roadmap we disussed beginning of august aims
>>> at a replacement of the console in 3.2 for end of november. 
>>> it requires at least a release cycle for public review before it will go
>>> into the platform. 
>> What is expected in jbpm-3.3.0.GA targetted for Nov 1st ?  How much will the new 
>> console differ in functionality from the JSF based console ?
> 
> Nothing. The earliest release would be 3.3.1.GA
> 
>> Which console will be shipped in jbpm-3.3.0.GA both or only the new one ?
>>
> The old one. As I said, the console roadmap sets the first release for
> end of november.
> 
>> Do you anticipate to maintain backend pluggability for 3 and 4 ?  Or will the jBPM 4 
>> console be a fork ?
>>
> 
> The jbpm3 gwt-console will go into maintainance (branch) and trunk will
> used for jbpm4. So basically it's a fork, yes.
> 
>>> IMO the console will have a release cycle on it's own
>>> and can subsequently be included via CP or as a point release in the
>>> community download.
>>>
>>> In general I'd say the JSF is dead as long as we find someone to
>>> maintain it.
>> I thought it would be easier to put the JSF console together jBPM 3 in maintenance 
>> after 3.3.0.GA.  But that's your call.  If you think you can get something in jBPM 3 
>> which is roughly the same functionality and stability, then of course from a 
>> supportability point of view that is a good improvement.
>>
>> regards, tom.
>>
>>
>>> /Heiko
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 14:34 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote:
>>>> Heiko,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to get an idea of what you intend to do for BI in jBPM 3.3.0 GA.
>>>>
>>>> I know there are currently 2 strategies on the table:
>>>>
>>>> 1) replace the JSF based console with a GWT based one.
>>>> 2) add the page with some statistics to the current JSF console.
>>>>
>>>> Given the timeframe, option 1 seems impossible to me, but I would like to hear your 
>>>> thoughts on the matter.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to see what Fady had cooked, I think I should be able to get that running 
>>>> on my machine...  Let' me know if you would like to take a look.
>>>>
>