[jbpm-dev] Re: jbpm-3.2.5.SP
Thomas Diesler
thomas.diesler at jboss.com
Fri Feb 6 07:27:36 EST 2009
I started of from 3.2.3 based on the common understanding that it
contained all fixes from the then latest SOA CP.
Mark Little wrote:
> Ring Trevor and Julian as I have to go out. However, if you started from
> the right codebase when you created your branch as we assumed then we
> wouldn't be in the position of having to backport. You need to answer
> the following question: did you use the right codebase when creating the
> new jBPM 3 branch from which 3.2.5 is based?
>
> If the answer is 'no' then you will need to either bring 3.2.5 up to the
> right codebase or port the issues we need fixing in this release from
> 3.2.5 across to the SOA-P jBPM branch. There are no alternatives to that
> as far as I can see.
>
> Anyhow, for now I'll leave it in the capable hands of Trevor and Julian.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 6 Feb 2009, at 12:14, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>
>> Mark, can we perhaps have a conf call where we decide what to do?
>>
>> The last suggestion of porting 9 months worth of work back to the
>> 3.2.2 code base is getting rather funny.
>>
>>
>> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>> If you don't have time, than please give me list of issues that you
>>> want me to verify. You svn diff you are talking about is 2MB
>>> (attached) and not suitable to draw any conclusion.
>>> How come the diff between jpdl-3.2.3 and jpdl-3.2.2-SOA-4.2.0.CP03 is
>>> so massive? Well I don't know - you need to talk to whoever mangaged
>>> those releases.
>>> Anyway, I dont think the diff approach will lead anywhere. Therefore
>>> I'd like to ask you again - please give me a specific list of SOA
>>> issues that you want me to check.
>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>> thomas, we do not have time to argue this. You can see what jBPM
>>>> related issues have been fixed in the SOA-P JIRA by using a suitable
>>>> filter and remembering that we have been abiding by our release
>>>> process for over a year. But irrespective of that you (yes, you)
>>>> need to do an svn diff and make sure that the baseline code that you
>>>> took over matches what we required from the jBPM productization
>>>> process. If that is not the case then your only major customer for a
>>>> productized jBPM 3 (the SOA-P) is not being satisfied and you need
>>>> to fix that.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mark.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 11:35, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Check JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't even know what issues you are talking about. Let alone
>>>>> whether any SOA issues created and resolved during 3.2.2 and 3.2.3
>>>>> (9 months) made it into the the jBPM test suite.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest you give me a defined list of SOA issues that you want me
>>>>> to verify. I can then see whether the jBPM testsuite has coverage
>>>>> for that. If it does not have coverage then test cases must be
>>>>> created and checked in the 3.2.5.SP branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> svn diff is IMHO no replacement for a successful hudson run.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>> Check JIRA. But do an svn diff between the last SOA-P jBPM branch
>>>>>> we accepted and what you are giving us now.
>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 11:20, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok then lets see the list of SOA issues that we talk about and
>>>>>>> find the associated test case in the jBPM testsuite that overs
>>>>>>> the given issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>>>> Let's put it this way: we cannot release the current jbpm branch
>>>>>>>> until we have confirmation that other issues have not been lost.
>>>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 10:44, trevor kirby wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Do we know if any other issues from the branch we were using
>>>>>>>>>> are missing in action?
>>>>>>>>> We have no confirmation either way, so we will have to check,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas does your hudson setupgive you any information about
>>>>>>>>> SOA related jiras that it tests against?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 10:40, trevor kirby wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the status?
>>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2017 - according to
>>>>>>>>>>> the jira comment - Corrected
>>>>>>>>>>> HibernateStringInstance.hbm.xml, made the correction work for
>>>>>>>>>>> Sybase/jConnect, wrote test case.
>>>>>>>>>>> There was also an associated late night checkin, thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2018 - should also be
>>>>>>>>>>> fixed by this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2005 - examples -
>>>>>>>>>>> they are still missing, but that is not a blocker. Thomas do
>>>>>>>>>>> we have an ETA?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1157 - fixed by moving
>>>>>>>>>>> to 3.2.5
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We are pulling the build and checking.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trev
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 Feb 2009, at 19:27, trevor kirby wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guizar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just joined the channel. I kinda prefer email, but I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meet you guys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are in the UK, so you joined just after we left :-(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alejandro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue, 05-02-2009 a las 13:58 +0000, trevor kirby escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro can you hop onto #jbosssoa please so we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lose some of the time lag in this discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you actually changing stuff at that level?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We don't make any changes here in the SOA platform build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A change at that level is not cosmetic and effectively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalidates our QA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed. So this change will require a re-test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that this issue needs to be reopened?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. The previous SOA version had a length of 4000, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this one needs it as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the changeset that removed length="4000"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/JbpmSvn?cs=2440
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the pointer. I've tried reversing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal of the length 4000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts of that changeset, but the generated sql still has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g.) varchar(255)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and nothing with length 4000, so I must be missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe Alejandro can fill in the details why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> length="4000" was removed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might be useful. Somehow, we need it back though ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>>>>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters
>>>>>>>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.
>>>>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters
>>>>>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.
>>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters
>>>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
>>>>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt
>>>>>> Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Mark Little
>>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
>>>> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
>>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt
>>>> Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
> ---
> Mark Little
> mlittle at redhat.com
>
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons
> (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>
>
>
More information about the jbpm-dev
mailing list