<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Pete,<br>
Happy to take the lead and get this started. Any idea for an
initial name?
<artifactId>jboss-as-session-replication</artifactId>?<br>
<br>
I was thinking @Stateful because it requires @Clustered, right? <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Clustered+EJBs">https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Clustered+EJBs</a><br>
<br>
@Stateless requires it as well, right? <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://docs.jboss.org/jbossclustering/cluster_guide/5.1/html/clustering-session.html">http://docs.jboss.org/jbossclustering/cluster_guide/5.1/html/clustering-session.html</a><br>
<br>
Are there any other Java EE features that need developer action to
make them clustering/failover-ready? Does CDI need anything for
replicating conversation or session scoped beans in a cluster?<br>
<br>
Regarding JSF, I'm fine with whatever folks think. JSF is good
since everything they need is built into the container. <br>
<br>
However, my first thought is that the simpler we can make things,
the better. A lot of folks hate JSF. I find pushing it at
organizations an uphill battle. When I say that acronym, a lot of
folks still roll their eyes. IMHO, the best solution for a
quickstart is the one that does the job with the least number of
moving parts. <br>
<br>
If there's 1 page and HTTP Basic Authentication, would we gain
anything by having JSF? Obviously am happy to accommodate what
others want.<br>
<br>
I was thinking:<br>
<ul>
<li>HTTP Basic Authentication</li>
<li>A servlet displaying a counter and the current login name.</li>
<li>@Stateful EJBs injected to maintain state.</li>
<li>@Stateless EJB injected just to show how.<br>
</li>
</ul>
WDYT?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Steven<br>
<br>
<br>
On 7/12/2012 4:55 PM, Pete Muir wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:F6DF774B-0655-45CE-9818-A72750334423@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Steven
Yes, we want a session replication quickstart :-)
We should, as you say, update it to use CDI (why an SLSB?) and Servlet 3. Possibly JSF?
Pete
On 12 Jul 2012, at 19:56, StevenBoscarine wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello All,
I wanted to do an exercise to test failover on our new EAP6 cluster.
Any recommendations?
The one I'm familiar with is using
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.jboss.org/wiki/ReplicatedCounter">https://community.jboss.org/wiki/ReplicatedCounter</a> and confirming the
counter doesn't go down when you kill a container.
If there isn't a great QS for session replication, does this dovetail
with any of the JDF Quickstarts? If so, I'd love to see it use a
@Stateful session bean, Maven, and Servlet 3.0. I could update this war
rather quickly if you saw value in having a QS specifically for testing
Session replication.
Thanks,
Steven
_______________________________________________
jdf-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jdf-users@lists.jboss.org">jdf-users@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-users">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>