<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/15/2013 06:18 PM, Rafael
Benevides wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51E47525.1040606@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Hi all, Sande and Pete,<br>
<br>
One significant change in JDF Quickstarts repo is the use of git
submodules to bring remote quickstarts to JDF. But... Sometimes
remote quickstarts doesn't ( and don't want/need to ) follow JDF
Contributing guide ( <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md">https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md</a>
).<br>
<br>
There are some requirements from QSTools ( <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://docspace.corp.redhat.com/docs/DOC-132902">https://docspace.corp.redhat.com/docs/DOC-132902</a>
) that I believe that we should update to split in two categories
( desired and mandatory ).<br>
<br>
The definitions bellow are what I see differences across JBoss
projects:<br>
- package and groupId name (of course) - We already defined that
using org.jboss.quickstarts.(eap|wfk|...) is optional from other
Quickstarts (not JDF) but should be consistent within the product<br>
</blockquote>
Agreed. Could we define properties or some other type of file that
could define the valid packages, groups, etc for each product?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:51E47525.1040606@redhat.com" type="cite"> -
License Headers<br>
</blockquote>
Yes. We saw this with the Spring-based quickstarts that originate
elsewhere. I'd still like to see this reported in case they are EAP
quickstarts.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:51E47525.1040606@redhat.com" type="cite"> -
<meta charset="utf-8">
Spacing and Indentation formats<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
I don't see this as being something someone would object too. But
maybe I'm wrong? Again, I'd still like to see this reported in case
they are EAP quickstarts.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:51E47525.1040606@redhat.com" type="cite"> What
do you think? Is it it desired to be more or less restrictive for
other quickstarts and also turn it in an automated pattern?<br>
<br>
I'm bringing this discussion mainly because it is a recurrent
discussion for remote projects like <br>
- Infinispan:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/infinispan/jdg-quickstart/pull/20#issuecomment-20968520">https://github.com/infinispan/jdg-quickstart/pull/20#issuecomment-20968520</a><br>
- GateIn:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23jboss-jdf/2013/%23jboss-jdf.2013-06-21.log.html#t2013-06-21T13:39:31">http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23jboss-jdf/2013/%23jboss-jdf.2013-06-21.log.html#t2013-06-21T13:39:31</a><br>
- And probable new others like BRMS, Fuse and Switchyard
Quickstarts.<br>
<br>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta charset="utf-8">
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>