[jsr-314-open] <h:dataTable> binding vs. ui:repeat

[Dan Allen]

Should the attribute be named "action" to be consistent with UICommand
components? (<h:commandButton>). Otherwise, +1

-Dan

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

>  On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 18:16 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> I don't get it. Why are JSR-299 and JSR-330 allowed to change so
> drastically before Java EE 6, yet we need one small change in EL and it
> can't happen. This is crap. If we all agree this change would be valuable, I
> want to see it included. Whose arm do we have to twist?
>
>
> For now, I'd still like to see the <f:valueChangeListener method="..."> and
> <f:actionListener method="..."> attributes provided, even if the
> ValueChangeEvent and ActionEvent parameters are lost. This functionality is
> important to provide even at a basic level, in my opinion. This would put
> the listener functionality in a more consistent place with the action method
> functionality on commandLink and commandButton.
>
> The full functionality can be addressed at a later date when it becomes
> possible through EL.
>
> The issue is:
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=612
>
> --Lincoln
>



-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20090831/8fa743c3/attachment.html