[jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification

[David Geary]

Ok, sure. That sounds even better.


david

2009/12/7 Kito Mann <kito.mann at virtua.com>

> +1
>
> I say we add it to the issue tracker for a the maintenance release (_not_
> 2.1).
> ---
> Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info |
> twitter: jsfcentral
> +1 203-404-4848 x3
>
> JSF Summit Conference Dec 1st-4th in Orlando: http://www.jsfsummit.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David Geary <clarity.training at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I hope I'm following the new convention for posts--if not, anyone is free
> to
> > yell at me. Anyway, this came up at JSF Summit:
> >
> > Right now, page authors do something like this...
> >
> >  xmlns:util="http://java.sun.com/jsf/composite/components/util"
> >
> > ...to access composite components in resources/components/util. I'd like
> to
> > propose that we allow page authors to simply do this instead:
> >
> > xmlns:util="components/util"
> >
> > It's much simpler, and is almost exactly what page authors do in Flex. In
> > many other respects, btw, implementing components in Flex is very similar
> to
> > what we now do in JSF 2.0.
> >
> >
> > david
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091207/d00394c7/attachment.html