[jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

I like both of these suggestions. Less is more.

> Further, in the interest of brevity, why say "composite"?  Why not match the
> implicit EL object and just say "cc"?
>
> Thus:
>
> xmlns:jim="jsf:cc:jim"
>
> Isn't that just as clear to someone who already knows what #{cc} is?
>
> Concerned that it's too cryptic?  Look at the first part of that phrase.
>  Anyone think that the XML standards guys should have called it xmlnamespace
> instead of xmlns?
>
> Shorter is almost always better, especially for frequently typed
> boilerplate.
>
> Jim
>