[jsr-314-open] [695-ccNamespace] CONDITIONALLY CLOSED (was: Re: [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification)

[Dan Allen]

Awesome!

When we use the term jsf2next, we are implying that it is not the MR, but
rather the next official milestone. If there is something that needs to be
corrected in the MR, please make that distinction. They should be errors or
compatibility, showstopper type of problems. I believe that is consistent
with what Ed has stated.

-Dan

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns at sun.com> wrote:

> >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:35:22 -0500, Kito Mann <kito.mann at virtua.com>
> said:
>
> KM> I like this idea... For a long time I've thought it was silly to use a
> KM> full-blown URL when it isn't necessary; I've been using URNs for my own
> KM> namespaces for a while.
>
> KM> At any rate, the main issue here is consistency with the rest of Java
> EE --
> KM> we should be careful here.
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:04:17 -0600, Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com>
> said:
>
> JL> On 12/11/09 12:49 PM, Dan Allen wrote:
> >> My second choice is (a), so if I lose on (c), I'll be happy with (a)
> >> too. I think that (b) is just too vague.
> JL> My preference is a, c, then b.
>
> a) jsf:cc:whatevername
> b) cc:whatevername
> c) jsfcc:whatevername
>
> This issue has been discussed thoroughly and the consensus rests on (a).
> I also favor (a).  I have filed [1].
>
> I'm marking it conditionally closed here pending the result of a "heads
> up" email to get feedback from the rest of JavaEE.
>
> Finally, we can't make this change in the very next release of the spec
> because the very next release will only contain very simple spec
> changes.  However, there's nothing stoping implementors from doing it.
>
> Ed
>
>
> [1]
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=695
>



-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091211/89f97f5c/attachment.html