[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] Proposal to support new semantic HTML5tags

[Jim Driscoll]

I actually oppose the idea of creating a lot of different tags with no 
significant difference except the name of the tag created.

It increases the conceptual weight  of the API - more tags that do the 
same thing is, I'd think, a bad thing.

Though this is mostly a moot point - there will be no HTML5 support in 
any near-term version of JSF.

Jim

On 12/14/09 10:25 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> +1 to Simon, I prefer individual tags for claritys sake.
>
> Lincoln Baxter III
> http://ocpsoft.com
> http://scrumshark.com
> Keep it simple.
>
>> On Dec 14, 2009 10:12 AM, "Simon Lessard" <Simon_Lessard at dmr.ca
>> <mailto:Simon_Lessard at dmr.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would highly prefer adding all tags in the h: namespace, else some
>> pages might end up with just too many imbricated panelGroup to be
>> easily readable. Furthermore the renderer will be more complex and
>> there would be a, albeit small, performance overhaul as the attribute
>> has to be evaluated. The only thing that won't be supported with tags
>> is dynamic change of the layout, but semantically it makes no sense
>> anyway. I think it would also be time to add <h:paragraph/>,<
>> h:fieldSet/>, <h:legend/>, briefly every single valid HTML tags.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> ~ Simon
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: jsr-314-open-bounces at jcp.org
>> <mailto:jsr-314-open-bounces at jcp.org> on behalf of Jim Driscoll
>> Sent: Fri 12/11/2009 5:41 PM
>> To: jsr-314-open at jcp.org <mailto:jsr-314-open at jcp.org>
>> Subject: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] Proposal to support new semantic
>> HTML5tags
>>
>> HTML5 has a number of new semantically meaningful tags. See here for a
>> painless introduction: ht...
>>