[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Wed Dec 16 17:18:07 EST 2009

Sorry guys. Had limited connection to the world for the past few days :)
My droid doesn't like java.net issue tracker -- who wants to write an
app??? ;)

Thanks Roger!

---
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple" 

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:25 -0700, David Geary wrote:

> Thanks Roger!
> 
> 
> david
> 
> 
> 2009/12/16 Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain at sun.com>
> 
>         I've filed this as "Implicit Resource Relocation":
>         https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=702
>         
>         -roger
>         
>         David Geary wrote:
>         
>                 2009/12/15 Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll at sun.com
>                 <mailto:Jim.Driscoll at sun.com>>
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                    Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?
>                 
>                 
>                 Lincoln?!? You were the last to respond, buddy. :)
>                 
>                 
>                 david
>                  
>                 
>                    We'll have to do a performance test to really see
>                 the
>                    implications, but it does seem like it would be
>                 useful to have this.
>                 
>                    Jim
>                 
>                 
>                    On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>                 
>                        I'd even like to see it add <head> if not
>                 provided. Would that
>                        be too
>                        overreaching?
>                 
>                        Lincoln Baxter III
>                        http://ocpsoft.com
>                        http://scrumshark.com
>                        Keep it simple.
>                 
>                            On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary"
>                            <clarity.training at gmail.com
>                            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com>
>                            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com
>                            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com>>>
>                 wrote:
>                 
>                            2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III
>                 <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
>                            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>
>                 
>                 
>                            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
>                 
>                 
>                            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>>>
>                 
>                 
>                            > > It would be nice if it "just worked",
>                 and jsf would
>                            automatically
>                            add/detect he right place to l...
>                 
>                            +1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as
>                 necessary to
>                            coordinate with
>                            resource relocation from h:outputScript and
>                            h:outputStylesheet, but it
>                            would be great if you could just use <head>
>                 and <body>
>                            instead, and
>                            have everything work.
>                 
>                 
>                            david
>                 
>                            > > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com
>                 >
>                            http://scrumshark.com >
>                            Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>         
>         
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091216/ca664196/attachment.html 